User talk:Keenan Pepper

Please click the "new section" button to start a new section, and remember to sign your posts with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks!

Deletion review for Michael Crook

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Michael Crook. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Afterthetruth (talk) 20:23, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

External link in Ant-fungus mutualism

Can you please explain to me why it is important to keep the external link to the abstract of "Coevolved Crypts and Exocrine Glands Support Mutualistic Bacteria in Fungus-Growing Ants"? As you may or may not be aware, the subject of attine ant-fungal symbiosis has been an important topic in the study of fungal and insect ecology, with many (probably several hundred at least) papers having been published on the topic since the early 1990s. This isn't exactly one of the key articles on the subject and also, the link leads only an abstract, not even an entire article. Hence "low-value link", and its choice as an external link strikes me as pretty random. My reading of Wikipedia's external links policy suggests that its not policy to fill external links lists with just anything. The reason I added the link that I did is because its a good general introduction to the topic, and is particularly useful due to the highly incomplete nature of the article itself. Peter G Werner (talk) 03:07, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

OK - I didn't realize it was a misplaced reference. Thanks for clearing that up. Peter G Werner (talk) 03:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

blahblah at Solid and elsewhere

Hi Keenan, as I appreciated your comment at Talk:Solid, I wanted to tell you that this dispute is close to a sustainable solution: perhaps you would like to express your opinion at Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Suggestions. Regards, -- Marie Poise (talk) 18:16, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Critical-point-table-screenshot.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Critical-point-table-screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 08:26, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:CFL Roughriders.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CFL Roughriders.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:09, 20 December 2009 (UTC)

monoisotopic and mononuclidic elements

Set A is the 26 mononuclic elements and B the 22 monoisotopic elements. The intersection consists of 19 elements that are both, but each set contains elements that are of one sort but not the other. There are 7 mononuclidics that are not monoisotopic, and there are 3 radioactive monoisotopics that are not mononuclidic.

Conflicting edits for Mössbauer spectrometry page

Please note the multiple notices that are up regarding the fact that my edit of the Mössbauer spectrometry page is IN PROGRESS. Therefore your jumping in and editing at the same time is causing a loss of both of our time. PLEASE feel free to contact me to give me feedback but DO NOT EDIT while the CopyEdit notice is still up!!

During a major edit, minor errors will inevitably creep in during the process. HOWEVER, these will be repaired during a more final sweep. That it the whole point of the editing process. PLEASE BE PATIENT!

Email me if you wish to discuss this matter further.

--SciHound (talk) 15:10, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Sorry about that, I didn't notice there was an important template there. —Keenan Pepper 19:53, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

This reads as a sarcastic response. However, I am choosing to accept your apology as exactly that, as my original message reads as rather a harsh rant now that I come back to it. I can only apologise myself and claim frustration as I had worked for several hours on a section without having saved it and risked losing all my changes because of the edit conflict. I see this was my fault for not working in more sensible, shorter chunks and can only put this down to a learning experience. However, I would prefer that you did not refer to other people's analogies as 'weird sentences'! Whether you agree to the inclusions or not, you will have noted that those lay explanations were fully referenced so you were insulting the original author rather than just me. Next time, please make your changes and note any kind of overtly judgemental comment on my User page instead. --SciHound (talk) 08:31, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I did mean the apology earnestly, sorry if it didn't sound sincere. It's easy to get off on the wrong foot, especially when I do things like ignore messages and step on people's feet. I feel embarrassed about it.

I only noticed two or three sentences that seemed "weird" to me (not sure how else to put it): One was "...the gamma-ray energy of the source is accelerated...", in which it seems weird to say that the energy is accelerated, instead of just saying the source is accelerated. Another was "When this effect occurs in spectroscopy, the emitting and absorbing nuclei are known to be identical.". That makes sense, I guess, because there's no way you're going to see the effect with different nuclides, but it just seems like a weird thing to say because it should already be clear that you have to use the same nuclide to get the Mössbauer effect. On second thought, it's certainly possible that you don't know anything about the composition of the sample a priori, so the most basic conclusion you can make from Mössbauer spectroscopy is "We got a signal from ⁵⁷Fe Mössbauer spectroscopy, therefore the sample indeed contains ⁵⁷Fe.". If it was meant that way then I suppose the sentence is perfectly relevant, but it just struck me as weird when I first read it.

The only other weird sentence seems like it could still be an issue for the article that concerns all potential editors, so I'll reply on the article talk page. —Keenan Pepper 09:59, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Fair enough. Let's start again. :)

Those particular sentences were not the ones I thought you were refering to but, I can confirm that the second point is NOT in fact obvious to anyone not deeply involved in the science without a great deal of mental acrobatics. Sometimes it is necessary to make a clear, concise statement of the obvious to help a reader along. We can't expect them to draw scientific conclusions themselves.

I am also still interested to know why you deleted the analogies? I acquiesce to the first, regarding the bullet and gun to explain recoil, as being potentially unnecessary (although I thought it added a little harmless polish and readability - but that's only my opinion) but I thought the second was highly useful to a lay person. Especially as the original copyedit request was for reasons of 'over technicality' and 'not suitable for a lay person.' I'm not upset - I communicate science for a living and would appreciate knowing your underlying thoughts. --SciHound (talk) 12:03, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

I don't understand... both of those analogies are still there, in the "Basic principle" section. I like them too. —Keenan Pepper 19:01, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Animations

Regarding this, no problem, no big deal. Rationale here. Cheers - DVdm (talk) 19:28, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Wikipedia featured animations

Category:Wikipedia featured animations, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 01:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Remember that Diesis sound example?

Hi there, do you remember about three years ago when you helped make a sound example for the Diesis page by rendering the MIDI file I had made into a nice sounding ogg with ZynAddSubFX? Yesterday User:Paolo.dL asked if it could be slightly changed so that the diesis was given in the form of 128/125 instead of 125/128 as it currently is--you can read his request and my response at User talk:Pfly#File:Diesis-example.ogg. His request makes sense to me--I hadn't realized the way "descending" way I did it is backwards from how intervals are usually presented. But it's been years since I wrote the Scala script, and I don't even have Scala on this computer now. I could probably eventually find it in the messy pile of CD and DVD backup discs lying around in disorganized piles here--or just write a new Scala script (after remembering how!). But first I thought I'd ask you if you might still have the ability to render that MIDI file into an ogg, and if you could reorder the MIDI notes the way Paolo has pointed out. The relevant files are linked at Talk:Diesis#Audio file. Don't worry if it would be troublesome to do. I can get to it sooner or later (I'd still have to ask about the rendering into ogg format--if you can still do that). I just thought I'd ask. Thanks! Pfly (talk) 21:51, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Third Stone from the Sun chorus.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Third Stone from the Sun chorus.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Solicity for deletion

The userpage and talk page of RAM216166bot having one solicity of deletion and permanent blocked, you having rights for delete now. BRAMCPPF (talk) 22:46, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Euler–Fokker genus

Could you address my questions at Talk:Euler–Fokker genus? Michael Hardy (talk) 19:11, 10 October 2010 (UTC)

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Keenan Pepper! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 20:45, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Source code for Pi Digit

Hey Keenan,

I'm impressed with your work on File:PiDigits.svg.

You claim to have written it in Gnuplot, an application which I am just beginning to use.

I was wondering if you could provide your source code for it. Feel free to post it it on my discussion page or here if you'd like.

It really doesn't seem to hard, and I think your code may be a good stepping stone for something simple.

Thanks! Teimu.tm (talk) 01:49, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

• Yea, you know, I was a bit more persistent last night, and I'm getting it. I found some good tutorials. So, while the official docs were a bit dense at first, I'm now able to digest them a bit better. I could do your Pi Digits graph in my sleep now =). Thanks! Teimu.tm (talk) 21:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC)

??

Got your message. Not sure why. I left the Tax day item on another user's talk page. Perhaps that user's talk page is on your watchlist? Oldtaxguy (talk) 05:41, 11 February 2011 (UTC)

Message from Annestultiens

Thanks for your advice! As you can tell, I am new to wikipedia and although the information is correct (it was an assignment at university), I don't really know anything about how wikipedia or internet browsers work. I'm glad there are people to help me! Annestultiens (talk) 10:28, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

No problem. Also note that when you leave a message on a talk page, you should start a new section unless you're replying to another comment (in which case you put it in that existing section). The "New section" button makes it convenient. —Keenan Pepper 13:51, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Optical circulator

Hi. I reverted your change to Optical circulator. The non-reciprocal behavior is of course a break in time-reversal symmetry. The point of the sentence you changed, though, is that a break in ordinary spatial symmetry is required to make this possible.--Srleffler (talk) 05:30, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Keenan Pepper! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States

The December 2011 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumioko (talk) 02:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Roll (gymnastics)

I made some suggestions for improvement on this article, they are on the talk page. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 18:24, 28 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Tamil Nadu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marigold (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

MSU Interview

Dear Keenan Pepper,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar (talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chlopeck (talk • contribs) 03:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Category:High points in Florida

Category:High points in Florida, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. __meco (talk) 08:54, 10 March 2012 (UTC)

RM for "Musical scale"

Keenan, you expressed an interest in the title of Musical scale. After you did that, I initiated a formal RM action to change the title to Scale (music). Your comments would be welcome there, of course.

Noetica^Tea? 23:47, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

Schwinger limit

Hi Keenan. I just created an article Schwinger limit that may be of interest to you based on your question [1]. You are of course welcome to improve the article as you wish. Teply (talk) 07:21, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Third Stone from the Sun chorus.svg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Third Stone from the Sun chorus.svg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:43, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Cat Organ/Piano

It's a real musical instrument. The dude who invented it was mentaly challenged, though. I've seen a book about it's inventor that mentions it. Forget the title, though. So... this isn't a hoax article.--SmartyPantsKid, Signing off. 14:49, 23 January 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmartyPantsKid (talk • contribs)

File:Coord1b.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Coord1b.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 04:07, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

LifeStyles data

Hi there! You are listed as the author of charts of the cumulative distributions of penis length and girth. I was wondering where you got the data for these charts. I'd like to use the data in a graduate course I teach. Thanks for any help you can provide! Denemark (talk) 21:41, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Cumulative Distribution of Penis Length

Cumulative Distribution of Penis Circumference

Proposed deletion of Oh-My-God particle

The article Oh-My-God particle has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Already mostly in 'Ultra-high-energy cosmic ray', I see no reason to just keep this page. Move everything fully, then redirect it?

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Steeldragon7 (talk) 02:34, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Love history & culture? Get involved in WikiProject World Digital Library!

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!

Hi Keenan Pepper! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the World Digital Library, a project of the Library of Congress and UNESCO. I'm recruiting Wikipedians who are passionate about history & culture to participate in improving Wikipedia using the WDL's vast free online resources. Participants can earn our awesome WDL barnstar and help to disseminate free knowledge from over 100 libraries in 7 different languages. Multilingual editing encouraged!!! But being multilingual is not a necessity to make this project a success. Please sign up to participate here. Thanks for editing Wikipedia and I look forward to working with you! EdwardsBot (talk) 14:32, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Orbifold article

Hi, thanks for your adding the "trivial example"(not meant pejoratively, of course) to the orbifold article a couple years ago. I don't know if you did that inresponse to my question on the talk page, not that it matters. I've been away from topology for a while, but i'm somewhat back now. Anyway, my point is, I left some more questions on the talk page yesterday that would help me, and probably other readers. Hope you're interested in tackling them.Thanks.199.33.32.40 (talk) 18:56, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Request for comment

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Contiguous USA graph source

Hi, do you have the source (a .dot file I believe) for http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:UnitedStatesGraphViz.svg ?

Thanks, 173.38.209.7 (talk) 10:53, 1 August 2014 (UTC)

It's right here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:UnitedStatesGraphViz.png#GraphViz_Source —Keenan Pepper 05:35, 4 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:Connected contributor

Template:Connected contributor has been nominated for merging with Template:Connected contributor multi. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:29, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Yeargh listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yeargh. Since you had some involvement with the Yeargh redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 15:26, 8 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of drainage basins by area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fitzroy River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of drainage basins by area, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Save River. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:06, 27 March 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection

Hello, Keenan Pepper. This message is intended to notify administrators of important changes to the protection policy.

Extended confirmed protection (also known as "30/500 protection") is a new level of page protection that only allows edits from accounts at least 30 days old and with 500 edits. The automatically assigned "extended confirmed" user right was created for this purpose. The protection level was created following this community discussion with the primary intention of enforcing various arbitration remedies that prohibited editors under the "30 days/500 edits" threshold to edit certain topic areas.

In July and August 2016, a request for comment established consensus for community use of the new protection level. Administrators are authorized to apply extended confirmed protection to combat any form of disruption (e.g. vandalism, sock puppetry, edit warring, etc.) on any topic, subject to the following conditions:

• Extended confirmed protection may only be used in cases where semi-protection has proven ineffective. It should not be used as a first resort.
• A bot will post a notification at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard of each use. MusikBot currently does this by updating a report, which is transcluded onto the noticeboard.

Please review the protection policy carefully before using this new level of protection on pages. Thank you.
This message was sent to the administrators' mass message list. To opt-out of future messages, please remove yourself from the list. 17:47, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Two-Factor Authentication now available for admins

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

A new user right for New Page Patrollers

Hi Keenan Pepper.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Keenan Pepper. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter - February 2017

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

Discuss this newsletter • Subscribe • Archive

13:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Supplemental angle listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Supplemental angle. Since you had some involvement with the Supplemental angle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 09:44, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguating Bahr el-Ghazal

I think I see what you are trying to do... But the way to do it is to have the dab page at the base name, which it currently is not. I suggest proposing a move from Bahr el-Ghazal (disambiguation) to the base name Bahr el-Ghazal and moving the pages Bahr el Ghazal and Bahr el Ghazal River to disambiguated names to allow the ambiguous titles to redirect to the dab page. Srnec (talk) 20:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

That sounds good, feel free to go ahead and do it if I don't get to it first. —Keenan Pepper 20:43, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Bakan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael Bakan requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.music.fsu.edu/person/michael-bakan. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DGG ( talk ) 05:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Keenan Pepper. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Trying to trace the source of an error

Greetings: Back in 2006 you contributed to article Shruti (music). The table of shrutis you included was referenced to Donald A. Lentz's book Tones and Intervals of Hindu Classical Music. But there is an error in that table you included. Was that table reproduced literally without change from Lentz's book? I'm trying to find out if there's an error in Lentz's book. Thanks. Cheers. Basemetal 02:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

What are you saying is the error in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shruti_(music)&oldid=46125896 ? —Keenan Pepper 02:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

The 12th shruti needs to be 729/512 for the interval between the 11th and the 12th to be pramāṇa and that between the 12th and the 13th to be pūraṇa. You can check that if the 12th shruti was 64/45 (as it is in the table), then the interval between the 11th and the 12th would not even be an interval recognized in the Indian system. It would be a so called diaschisma (2048/2025). Besides the content in cents of the 12th shruti, as recorded in the table, cannot be right, but that's not that important to me. Both numbers were corrected in https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shruti_(music)&oldid=60864182, but my question is not about the accuracy of the current table, but what the source of that first error was, specifically if it came from Lentz's book. Basemetal 02:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Well, I can't actually find the book at all right now. I'd guess I copied it from the book exactly, but it's certainly possible I altered it, especially since the discrepancy is exactly a schisma. —Keenan Pepper 14:49, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Criss-cross applesauce listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Criss-cross applesauce. Since you had some involvement with the Criss-cross applesauce redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 19:43, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

12 years of adminship, today.

Wishing Keenan Pepper a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 06:05, 1 May 2018 (UTC)

Danubian cycloid

Hello Sam Derbyshire, Could You do some maps of three phase cycloid Danube propagation and paleodynamics for open access sci article. It would be great breakthrough. After we can use it on Commons. Best, Lepota luba cosmo lepota.cosmo@hotmail.com--178.220.219.36 (talk) 03:48, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

No idea what you're talking about, I'm afraid. —Keenan Pepper 17:10, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Map of the USA highlighting New Jersey.png

The file File:Map of the USA highlighting New Jersey.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned map.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 16:46, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day

Happy First Edit Day, Keenan Pepper, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Nat965 (talk) 20:02, 27 October 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Keenan Pepper. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Pizza Pop!

I restored the article which you made in 2006, which was deleted in 2007. Harizotoh9 (talk) 13:17, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Day to YOU! ♥

Wishing Keenan Pepper a very happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Coffeesweet (talk) 18:53, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Administrators must secure their accounts The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised. Use strong, unique passwords for your Wikipedia account and associated email Change your password now if your Wikipedia account password or email password is reused on another website, exposed, or weak Enable two-factor authentication now for improved security

View additional information

Why have I received this message? All administrators are receiving it. What prompted you to send this message? Recently, several Wikipedia admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account. What do I need to do? Only to follow the instructions in this message. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites). Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable). Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers. How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)? You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:40, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Request of overview on a source contribution

Hello Mr Pepper,

I stumbled today on the article about DMSA, where you asked an unknown user to provide sources about the statement "DMSA cannot cross brain-barrier on humans". The user provided sources. I checked the sources and they appear to be insufficient to support that claim. I explained, with details, why, on the talk page. But I don't want yet to remove the doubtful claim before someone approved the necessity to do so, since I'm fairly new to Wikipedia and not sure on how things work here.

Here is the link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Dimercaptosuccinic_acid

Would you please give an eye to it ? Does it seem correct to you ?

Cordially,

Eldieke (talk) 20:45, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

If there's information that isn't actually backed up by the sources, by all means please feel free to remove it. You don't have to ask me or anybody else. Wikipedia:Be Bold. —Keenan Pepper 20:49, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

"Heaviest subatomic particle" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Heaviest subatomic particle. Since you had some involvement with the Heaviest subatomic particle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 20:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Invitation to join the Fifteen Year Society

Dear Keenan Pepper,

I'd like to extend a cordial invitation to you to join the Fifteen Year Society, an informal group for editors who've been participating in the Wikipedia project for fifteen years or more. ​

Best regards, Chris Troutman (talk) 13:46, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Garbanzo beans

Hello, Keenan Pepper,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Kingsif and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged Garbanzo beans for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. You may find our guide for writing quality articles to be extremely informative.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Kingsif}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kingsif (talk) 03:01, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

This makes no sense to me because it's just a redirect, and it seems like a totally average, useful redirect. I assume you have no issue with Garbanzo bean -> Chickpea, so why shouldn't we also have one for the plural? —Keenan Pepper 15:42, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

14 years of Adminship

Wishing Keenan Pepper a very Pepper happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Chris Troutman (talk) 14:14, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks, but I think your template or whatever might be broken for usernames with spaces in them! —Keenan Pepper 21:37, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

"List of languages by native speakers" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect List of languages by native speakers. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 4#List of languages by native speakers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Soumyabrata ^talk _contribs ^subpages 08:33, 4 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Iron Man riff.svg at FFD

Hello. I took the image File:Iron Man riff.svg, which you uploaded, to Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2020 May 5, where I invite you to discuss it. --George Ho (talk) 07:35, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Coord1b.png

Hi! Do you remember if you made this old file? It will probably look like ms:Fail:Coord1b.jpg. I ask because the file is used on ms.wiki. --MGA73 (talk) 12:08, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't remember. I did a significant amount of converting image formats or sprucing them up, rather than creating them. —Keenan Pepper 16:25, 14 May 2020 (UTC)

Okay thank you! --MGA73 (talk) 07:12, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

Taxobox for species

Hi, just to note that for an article about a species, like Aframomum angustifolium, the taxobox should use {{Speciesbox}} not {{Automatic taxobox}}. {{Speciesbox}} picks up the taxonomic hierarchy from the genus name, so it doesn't require a taxonomy template to be created for every species. Peter coxhead (talk) 06:51, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Iyaelima people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hog. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Happy Adminship Anniversary!

Wishing Keenan Pepper a very Pepper happy adminship anniversary on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 16:31, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Administrators will no longer be autopatrolled

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

How we will see unregistered users

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:13, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

New administrator activity requirement

The administrator policy has been updated with new activity requirements following a successful Request for Comment.

Beginning January 1, 2023, administrators who meet one or both of the following criteria may be desysopped for inactivity if they have:

1. Made neither edits nor administrative actions for at least a 12-month period OR
2. Made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period

Administrators at risk for being desysopped under these criteria will continue to be notified ahead of time. Thank you for your continued work.

22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Happy Eighteenth First Edit Day!

Hey, Keenan Pepper. I'd like to wish you a wonderful First Edit Day on behalf of the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Chris Troutman (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

"Bronco trolley" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Bronco trolley has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 September 27 § Bronco trolley until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 00:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day!

Happy First Edit Day, Keenan Pepper, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 21:39, 28 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)