User talk:Kailash29792/Archive 25

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Kailash29792. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 20

←

Archive 23

→

Regarding Boney Kapoor's article and many others

Hey Kailash29792, Are you interested in getting Boney Kapoor, Ranvir Shorey, Arjun Kapoor and Sushant Singh Rajput's articles to Fa. If yes then you can start work in these articles otherwise please explain me the reason because i am new this encyclopedia i don't know much about editing. Regards, Raghav Chaturvedi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.208.90.147 (talk) 08:35, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi Raghav, while I am very much interested in seeing these articles touch FA, I am already committed to other projects. You could create an account, you know? And you will be guided on editing. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Hey Kailash29792, I want to create a account but could not because i am very under confident in doing wikipedia editing because i could not judge how to see if a source is verified plus my english is not that amazing i think in this site a article should reach fa by a more experience editor like you who have minimum of 2-5 years of experience who do a lot of high level of editing. I am in a final year of engineering plus busy with December semester exams will join wikipedia on January 2017. I just want to assist you when i will join this encyclopedia. So i can also become an experience editor . I also want you guide me that can i register my wikipedia account under Raghav Chaturvedi my real name or i have keep my username something else. Till then can you please take care of above mentioned articles. Can you please check Boney Kapoor's dob in his article if it is correct or not or according to verfied source. Take care. Regards Raghav Chaturvedi. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.245.146.114 (talk) 10:32, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Well then, see you in 2017. Best to avoid using your full name to keep yourself safe. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:43, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

The truth is that Kailash I am not Raghav Chaturvedi. I am Mridul Sharma who banned from wikipedia so please look after the above articles and make it to Fa. I just want to become a reader on wikipedia not an editor. Please don't block me from wikipedia because i am writing on your talk page. Please remove that Combat Mridul Section in Krimuk90's archive 13. I am sorry i lied but i have not other option.Even my real account also has been compromised and i don't have any way to reset my wikipedia password. From:User talk:Mriduls.sharma. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.230.226.45 (talk) 06:45, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:37, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Pride of Tamil Cinema

Hi, this book by Dhananjayan is available for ₹1500. I went through the sample on Google books. It contains much details of landmark Tamil films. I am not buying as I cannot afford to buy any books at that range. If you are interested (and can afford), go here --UKSharma3 04:24, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

I already bought it and used much of it for developing articles. But you wouldn't believe me if I told you why I now regret buying it. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:10, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Is it! Thanks for the info.--UKSharma3 08:54, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Comic book Resources listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Comic book Resources. Since you had some involvement with the Comic book Resources redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Domdeparis (talk) 17:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Chandralekha (1948 film)

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Chandralekha (1948 film) has been completed.

The article is so well written that it required only the most minor of changes, as you will see.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 22:01, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Baahubali 2 The Conclusion poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Baahubali 2 The Conclusion poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

FYI

Hi Kailash, FYI, since you have no doubt interacted with these accounts: please see this. Upsetting, I'm sure. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:18, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

I can't believe it, even a tiny bit. Because they both looked like such promising editors who respected Wiki policies, and their editing styles hardly resembled each other. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Well, re: your query here, you can hardly criticize Bbb23 for the block "without even opening a SPI page" -- I mean, when last we spoke, even copying diffs was apparently a giant burden that you found avoidable unless it was performed by a "die-hard investigator". Anyhow, to address your query, the progression of events began at this AN3 report. After seeing some questionable edits from a new user calling themselves OneFourZero, I opened an SPI case against OneFourZero and asked for CU to compare the account to TRUEV140. Despite the duck similarities, that actually turned out to be a dud, but since I was also suspicious that OneFourZero had been created as a decoy perhaps created by Essex-1799 to bolster his own case, I asked Bbb23 if Essex could have created it. My suspicion was not confirmed, but B's investigation uncovered a "can of worms" as detailed here and the resulting accounts that were blocked were Inside the Valley (who I guess I didn't know that well), Charles Turing, and Essex-1799. Now, you might say that their editing styles didn't resemble each other, but that doesn't mean they weren't editing in concert or engaging in straight-up meatpuppetry. Or that they were violating WP:PAID, which requires all paid editors to disclose that they are being paid, as well as to disclose who is paying them. I could rant on, but the bottom line is that the CU investigation found a link, and something has to change or Indian films is going to become as immediately sanctionable as caste articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

But you still can't expect me to be pleased with two promising users being blocked, for the number of editors devoted to protecting Wikipedia has now decreased, unlike the police and military where they have quick replacements for deceased officers. Meanwhile, can someone please get Bhishoom blocked for being a sock? Kailash29792 (talk) 05:43, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

I had reservations about IV and CT earlier. They were relatively new and were very much obsessed with Malayalam cinema and WP:FL. And Kailash, I'm not sure what you mean by 'respecting wiki policies'. It seems you're not aware that WP:SOCK is a violation of our 'policies', and if the accounts are confirmed by a WP:CU I see no reason to question the blocking admin. On the other hand, you make blatant accusations against genuine editors. Sorry to say, but this is not befitting of an experienced editor like you. Cyphoidbomb, the other day I was going through the caste (Indian) articles. It was loaded with POV and rubbish; it's probable that there's a cabal operating behind these accounts. A big applause to User:Sitush for keeping the encyclopedia clean. —Vensatry _(talk) 07:05, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Oh, Ricky81682 was blocked for SP? That's shocking! —Vensatry _(talk) 07:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Yeah, totally awful. We need more admins who understand the problems in India-related articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:54, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Kailash, my post came off more soapboxy than I intended. I'm sorry. I'll look into the other Bhishoom stuff later when I get a chance. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 11:17, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

I've opened the SPI on Padmalakshmisx. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:34, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

...and thank you for getting him blocked. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:17, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Mother India, calender

In this edit of Mother India, you added the HTML comment in these two sentences:

The idea of the nation as mother (''[[Bharat Mata]]'', or Mother India) was prevalent in pre-independence India, and was an important trope for nationalism and [[Indian independence movement]]. Representation of the nation as mother were evident in paintings, literature, music and commodities such as [[calender]]s.

I agree with you that the two words have separate meanings, but I suspect that "calendar" is correct here. I imagine paper calendars with artwork on each page representing the nation as mother. I cannot imagine industrial equipment such as calenders used for paper or textile manufacturing being used to represent the nation as mother. Kindly explain your thinking in support of "calender". I will look for your response here. Anomalocaris (talk) 08:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Wiktionary describes "calender" as "A machine, used for the purpose of giving cloth, paper etc., a smooth, even, and glossy or glazed surface, by cold or hot pressure, or for watering them and giving them a wavy appearance; it consists of two or more cylinders revolving nearly in contact, with the necessary apparatus for moving and regulating." That was what I was referring to. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:46, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

AVM Films

Hey bro, can you send me the photos of Saravanan's book on AVM's films (like Bedara Kannappa (1954), Bhookailas (1958), Deivapiravi (1960), Paava Mannippu (1961), Paarthaal Pasi Theerum (1962), Pachai Vilakku (1964), Kaakum Karangal (1965), Major Chandrakanth (1966) and Adhey Kangal (1967) to name a few. Whichever one Saravanan has explained a lot about from these films). Do send them to shaun.srini152415@gmail.com. Thanks. — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 08:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

I recently realised that photobucket is not accessible in every network I connect to (same for Yahoo, my chief source of emailing). Therefore, I uploaded a few chapters from AVM 60 Cinema to my Google Drive account (click here), which has more accessibility than the former two sites. I have not uploaded everything, but will do, as it has a lot of free space. If it is not accessible to you, I'll mail you the pages. Kailash29792 (talk) 08:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Can you share the files with me if possible? — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:03, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Well I just did! Here's the link in case you missed. Or is it inaccessible due to privacy settings? (I don't remember setting any though.) Because I cannot currently email you. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:07, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

In that case, it's inaccessible. You can e-mail them to me when you can.

— Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:11, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Done I made the photos publicly accessible. Should work now. Here's the updated link. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:16, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Nice one. Do add Adhey Kangal if you manage to get it. Thanks.

— Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 09:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

I've uploaded what I could find. See now. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:27, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Nice. Ganesan's biography (both his one and Baskaran's one) would be great as I might find something out of them. Nothing on Adhey Kangal? Surprising given how notable the film is. BTW, Kalathur Kannamma looks like a potential GA. You can do it, Kailash, yeah (like Alibabavum 40 Thirudargalum).

— Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 11:24, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

I have uploaded the pages from Ganesan's autobiography, but it will take some time to upload the pages from Baskaran's biography of him since I don't have the book and must photograph the pages from the shop (I could just photograph the entire book since it isn't so long). Kailash29792 (talk) 15:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Recent Revert to RJ Balaji

Hello, with your recent revert to RJ Balaji can you explain more clear about the revert.WP:NOYT states that Facebook links are allowed only when they have direct link to that page from their official website. But it seems to be there is no official website for RJ Balaji Thank you!.--Universalrahu (talk) 07:02, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

RJ Balaji has only two official sites: his FB and Twitter pages. If you think they are fake accounts, please see the blue tick sign near the name. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:30, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Its not the question about whether the account is verified or unverified. Is it about the abiding of Wikipedia's policy and guidelines. As per WP:NOYT bare link to Facebook is restricted unless supported by official website.--Universalrahu (talk) 19:12, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Shah Rukh Khan Biggest Movie Star

It wasn't a mistake. I've given the right references for that Shah Rukh Khan is the Biggest Movie Star In The World described by CNN and Forbes.^[1]^[2]^[3] But you always removing those. Please keep it as it right and given from proper reference. ARNAB22 (talk) 13:05, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

References

^ Rani Singh (26 December 2015). "Shah Rukh Khan - The Biggest Movie Star In The World". Forbes.
^ Rob Cain (16 April 2016). "Don't Worry, Here's Proof That Shah Rukh Khan Is Still The World's Biggest Movie Star". Forbes.
^ "CNN Calls SRK the World's Biggest Movie Star". Indicine.

Bollyjeff, you are invited to lecture him. Kailash29792 (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Why, will he listen? Both Forbes sources were written by contributors, not staff, and are marked as opinion. The CNN one may be better, but we already have text in the lead about his nicknames at the top, and about his success at the bottom. It is overkill to have this as well. Other editors will object, as they have in the past. We have been through this before. Bollyjeff | talk 15:09, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

@ARNAB22: Surely you don't think that it's appropriate for a neutral article to include glorifying puff-pieces with obnoxiously hyperbolic statements placed prominently in the lead. I would think it would be common sense that this would be inappropriate, but in case you need a more specific guideline, please note MOS:INTRO:

"The reason for a topic's noteworthiness should be established, or at least introduced, in the lead (but not by using subjective "peacock terms" such as "acclaimed" or "award-winning" or "hit")."

Please familiarize yourself with our general Manual of Style as well as our Manual of Style for film articles. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:08, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

And since this is a biography article, MOS:BIO. Should we move some of this to the SRK talk page for safe keeping? Bollyjeff | talk 15:14, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

If Arnab strikes again, yes. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Just in case this comes up again, the CNN interview introduction is really 'The LA Times has called my next guest "...perhaps the world's biggest movie star"' Not quite the full blown endorsement and it's not from CNN and the quote from the LA Times is already in the article. Ravensfire (talk) 19:25, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Congratulations

	The Featured List Barnstar
	For taking Rajinikanth filmography to FL status. Congratulations and keep up the good work! — Ssven2 ^{Speak 2 me} 08:36, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For your work on Rajinikanth filmography. Congratulations on the success! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 10:39, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

TFL notification

Hi, Kailash29792. I'm just posting to let you know that Rajinikanth filmography – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been chosen to appear on the Main Page as Today's featured list for December 12. The TFL blurb can be seen here. If you have any thoughts on the selection, please post them on my talk page or at TFL talk. Regards, Giants2008 (Talk) 23:15, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

TRPoD

"I think TRPoD died, and his soul has taken over Dharmadhyaksha's body". I can understand your viewpoint, but people may assume something else. Please be careful enough. We've already seen so many suffering. :) Pavanjandhyala (talk) 06:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Seconded. It's totally unwarranted on your part, Kailash. Being a long time contributor, you should know what NOT to do! That said, I don't understand the hatred towards TRPoD; he was an excellent editor who knew what it means to "maintain" WP. —Vensatry _(talk) 18:33, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

I know this is an old conversation and nobody asked me, but I'm feeling nosy. I think we need more TRPoDs. I know that some of you had issues with his gruff demeanor, and I understand that, but TRPoD was (as Vensatry notes) a really solid editor who cut a looooot of crap from Indian articles, and probably for no reason other than it offended him to see the problems. I know where he's coming from. I do the same thing. I wish he'd return, frankly. I'll be quiet now.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Varun Parandhaman copyedit request

Sorry, but the request has been declined because the subject seems to be non-notable and copyediting a page which probably wouldn't survive AFD would be a waste of time. All the best, Miniapolis 14:18, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Nallathoru Kudumbam

Hi, I appreciate you for uploading original posters/news paper advertisements, but I suggest you to upload it over existing file rather than completely removing it. Also make sure not to upload any watermarked files.Rajeshbieee (talk) 21:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

I have temporarily uninstalled Photoshop for PC maintenance, that is why I can't remove watermarks. Kailash29792 (talk) 01:49, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Kailash29792. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Rajeshbieee, I don't understand why is the image still watermarked? And I did not receive any mail. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:57, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Okay, please send a mail to me - rajes434@yahoo.com. I have the poster with removed watermark. I will send it to you.Rajeshbieee (talk) 06:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks Rajeshbieee for the de-watermarking. I could de-watermark File:Pasumpon.jpg, but I don't plan on re-installing Photoshop until next week. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Pasumpon de-watermarked poster also sent to you. Please check your mail. Rajeshbieee (talk) 10:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Hey Kailash Mridul here

Hey Kailash, I am Mriduls.sharma the kancha cheena aka Sanjay Dutt of wikipedia. I am powerful than wikipedia admins. I have hanged Krimuk90 to death like deenanath chauhan in agneepath and now krimuk90 is becoming herself as daughter Sro23. Please tell your friend Sro23 stop doing socketpuppetry otherwise i will get her raped and will make a video of getting her raped and upload it to wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.197.137.121 (talk) 09:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Are you suggesting that Sro23 is a sockpuppet of Krimuk? Kailash29792 (talk) 09:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Yes Sro23 is a socketpupppet Krimuk. Sro23 https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/Sro23 came here in 2015 you can see it in the link and his editing pattern and his/her distinction to not to tell his/her gender on userpage and reverting my ip edits from my socketpuppet investigation page is surely krimuk. That's the reason he/she has permanently retired as krimuk because he/she editing through Sro23. Regards 117.197.153.13 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 10:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Troll is only here to be disruptive. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Image tagging for File:Nagarvalam.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Nagarvalam.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:31, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

FAC

I have nominated the article, please do put your comments here. This is my first solo FAC.Krish | Talk 21:05, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Updating image files

Hi Kailash29792. I've noticed that you've uploaded an "updated" version for File:Power Rangers (2017 Official Theatrical Poster).png. When uploading a version which is different is design, etc, from previous versions, it's generally considered best to simply upload the file as a new file to Wikipedia using a different filename and not as an updated version of the older one because it makes it easier to compare images, especially non-free images, and possibly determine which version is more appropriate for use in the article via the article's talk page. It also makes a difference because sometimes the source and copyright information is not the same for each image. Generally, only slightly altered versions (e.g., cropped or re-sized versions, etc.) should probably be uploaded as an "updated version". Any major change such as change in design, coloring, sponsor name, file format, etc. should probably be uploaded as a new file under a different name. Would you mind reuploading this image once again as a separate file? -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:55, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

While I understand your point, I am against uploading separate files as I find them redundant. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:51, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Flash vs. Arrow

Could you have a look and try expanding it further. Thanks! Brojam (talk) 04:04, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

If provided sources, yes. My main intention in creating drafts related to The Flash is to see that they eventually enter the mainspace. But sometimes searching for sources is like searching for a needle in a haystack. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:11, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fast 8.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fast 8.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:17, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK

On 17 December 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Bhaktha Sri Thyagaraja, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bhaktha Sri Thyagaraja. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Bhaktha Sri Thyagaraja), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 14:02, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Triple crown

DYK

Hello! Your submission of Alibabavum 40 Thirudargalum (1956 film) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:53, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

DYK

Hello! Your submission of Bohdan Khmelnytsky Monument, Kiev at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:38, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas to all!

	We wish you a Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year 2017!
	Wishing you and yours a Merry Christmas, and a Happy, Glorious, Prosperous New Year! God bless! — Ssven2 ^{Looking at you, kid} 11:36, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas 2016

"And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold,

I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.

For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord."

Luke 2:10-11 (King James Version)

Tito Dutta (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas.

This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove.

Spread the cheer by adding {{Subst:Xmas4}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Tito Dutta (talk) 16:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Season's greetings

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2017!

Hello Kailash29792, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2017.
Happy editing,
Favre1fan93 (talk) 22:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

to kalish

tq kalish, and please tey to edit tamaanah filmgrophy , her new film queen remake.tq Syampratham (talk) 11:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Syampratham, we generally don't add films that are not yet shooting to filmography tables, per WP:NFF. Kailash29792 (talk) 11:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Redirect

Please redirect Dharmam Enge with Dharmam Engey. Srivin (talk) 16:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Andha Naal

Have you postponed the FAC plans? —Vensatry _(talk) 13:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Not quite. Redtiger said the article looked fine from his perspective, and since the PR was open for too long without much activity, (though I'm convinced the article looks great with over 80 sources, sans Dhananjayan's books) I requested it be closed, for I'm sure the FAC will attract more comments. I'll open the FAC by the end of this week, and could you please make some more improvements since you will be co-nominator? Kailash29792 (talk) 13:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Sure, but I thought we could've invited a few more editors. —Vensatry _(talk) 13:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Then invite while you still can! Inviting is not my best job, but I'll try to revoke my closure request. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:59, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

No issues, proceed with the FAC. —Vensatry _(talk) 16:06, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

[1] Rani Singh (26 December 2015). "Shah Rukh Khan - The Biggest Movie Star In The World". Forbes.

[2] Rob Cain (16 April 2016). "Don't Worry, Here's Proof That Shah Rukh Khan Is Still The World's Biggest Movie Star". Forbes.

[3] "CNN Calls SRK the World's Biggest Movie Star". Indicine.

[1]

[2]

[3]