User talk:Jrovc

Welcome!

Hello, Jrovc, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Atlantic306 (talk) 08:06, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic306 msg reply

Hi Atlantic306, Thank you for your post Jrovc (talk) 09:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Numbers

Your additio of numbers to quantities written out in words is not needed. Please stop doing it. Britmax (talk) 19:01, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Britmax msg reply

Hi Britmax, Thank you for your suggestion, I love your comments Jrovc (talk)

February 2022

Hi Jrovc! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Henry F. Korth that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:21, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kj cheetham msg reply

Hi Kj! Happy to see you. I understand your opinion, Hope to follow your advice in the future. Thanks for sharing with me such a piece of wonderful information. Jrovc (talk)

Henry F. Korth moved to draftspace - at contributor's request

An article you recently created, Henry F. Korth, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 17:27, 17 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

jmcgnh msg reply

Hi jmcgnh! Happy to see you. Thanks for your help. Love it. Jrovc (talk)

Speedy deletion nomination of Anwarul Azim Arif

Hello Jrovc,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Anwarul Azim Arif for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source, probably infringing copyright.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Bensci54 (talk) 18:02, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Bensci54 msg reply

Rewrite page

I want to rewrite this page with my own words. So please let me know how I can start.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Anwarul_Azim_Arif&action=edit&redlink=1

Jrovc (talk) 16:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry F. Korth (March 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is a well drafted page, but unfortunately does not yet show sufficient evidence of notability: please see WP:PROF. The page requires at lease some WP:RS (most of the current sources do not meet this requirement). Please amend accordingly and resubmit-- ping me and I would be happy to reassess.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Henry F. Korth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Henry F. Korth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Cabrils (talk) 22:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments @Cabrils Jrovc (talk) 12:51, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's looking good now! Just needs cleanup in the referencing-- see my comments on the draft page. Cabrils (talk) 00:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jrovc! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Cabrils (talk) 22:15, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Henry F. Korth has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Henry F. Korth. Thanks! StarryGrandma (talk) 03:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I updated draft according to your advice. Please have a look. Thank you @StarryGrandma for your help Jrovc (talk) 12:53, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Henry F. Korth has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Henry F. Korth. Thanks! Cabrils (talk) 00:46, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabrils I updated all references and resubut the page, please have a look. Thank you for your support. Jrovc (talk) 13:00, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Henry F. Korth has been accepted

Henry F. Korth, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Cabrils (talk) 00:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Cabrils I am very happy to know that Wikipedia accepts my page. And especially I like to give you thanks for your help. Jrovc (talk) 04:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jrovc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is ________. Place any further information here. Jrovc (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Since your account is not directly locked, it's easier for you to go to WP:IPECPROXY and follow the instructions there to get IP block exemption. — Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Daniel Case I am very happy to see your reply. And especially I like to give you thanks. Jrovc (talk) 04:56, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jrovc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is ________. Place any further information here. Jrovc (talk) 18:03, 28 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As above, you'll need to follow the directions at WP:IPECPROXY. SQL ^{Query Me!} 18:30, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why I am facing the same problem again and again?

Did you do as asked above? 331dot (talk) 09:35, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jrovc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is ________. Place any further information here. Jrovc (talk) 15:18, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The answer you will get when you make these requests will not change. A tip- you can remove the "place any further information here" should you make another request. 331dot (talk) 21:49, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Jrovc, I've provided you with WP:IPBE for 3 months in order to allow you to edit through the blocks you are encountering.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:57, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo Thank you for your help.

The Korth article...

...would benefit from an Award and Honors section that includes information on his election/appointment to the two prestigious societies. David notMD (talk) 15:48, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Love to see your message @David notMD Jrovc (talk) 08:29, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User page awards

You list - twice - the four awards up to Grognard. Most editors only show the highest one, once. David notMD (talk) 10:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jrovc (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 37.111.216.230. Place any further information here. Jrovc (talk) 18:06, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm tempted to block you directly. WP:IDHT. Yamla (talk) 18:32, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You asked me to elaborate on the above. You keep on making these unblock requests. You've been told, over and over again, how you should resolve this problem. Instead of following that advice, you continue making the unblock requests, falsely claiming these are not proxies. You appear to be deliberately wasting our time. Once, sure. Twice, maybe. Four times? This looks to be deliberate. Others have pointed you to WP:IPECPROXY. I have pointed you to WP:IDHT. --Yamla (talk) 14:45, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Yamla message response

Yamla I need to follow this WP:IPECPROXY. Thank you for helping me with understanding the scenario. Jrovc (talk) 15:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Jrovc (talk) 10:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

QC

Hi,

I noticed that You know something about Q computers.

And programming also.

May I inquiry are You familiar with the Four Strands networks and Popper epistemology?

I have translated the Beginning of Infinty from English to Finnish (but not published yet..)

Sincerely,

--Asko Kartasto (talk) 17:39, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your msg. I have some basic knowledge about Four Strands networks, you can share with me your draft Jrovc (talk) 13:00, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Belvilla AG

Hello, Jrovc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Belvilla AG, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:01, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vitaldent

Hello, Jrovc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vitaldent, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 16 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Draft:Vitaldent

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Vitaldent, was deleted as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:38, 14 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message @Liz Jrovc (talk) 15:29, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Quick.js

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Quick.js, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:38, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:NestJS

Hello, Jrovc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:NestJS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Solid.js

Hello, Jrovc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Solid.js, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:TalkJS

Hello, Jrovc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:TalkJS, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hammer.js

Hello, Jrovc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hammer.js, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:05, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: NestJS (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Greenman were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NestJS and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:15, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Astro software

Hello, Jrovc. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Astro software, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:05, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]