User talk:Jrcagle
Welcome
[edit]Hey there, Jrcagle. Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you enjoy being a Wikipedian and decide to stay! Here are a few good links for newcomers (or "oldcomers" for reference):
By the way, you should sign and date your comments on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. Three tildes (~~~) produces just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!
Great, just what we need around this place... more little "cagles". :) Cheers. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 19:22, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
- And sorry for such a delayed welcome. --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 19:23, 21 September 2005 (UTC)
- You said on my talk page that it was good that "at least one person treated you like a person." Is that because no one ever really welcomed you, or because people have been mean to you here on WP? --Lord Voldemort (Dark Mark) 13:33, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
A bit of a dispute between me and User:Ultramarine has erupted here. In particular, he is suggesting that our discussion about the criticism section of categorical imperative was resolved not by agreement, but by your giving up after being too frustrated to continue arguing with me. As that was not my appraisal of the situation at all, would you please have a look at my discussion with him, and maybe share some of your thoughts? --Ryan Delaney talk 17:23, 2 February 2006 (UTC)
Retirement
[edit]Please email me through the WP for more info on Keith's retirement. (PS, you don't have a valid email specified.) --Flex 12:12, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Calvinist confederacy
[edit]Please lend your thoughts to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calvinist confederacy. --Flex 18:41, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Baptism of Jesus
[edit]Hi. I'm afraid I won't be much help on this one. I was just making spell checks/corrections and that page happened to show up in my target list. I really know next to nothing about that content. Scarlet Lioness 13:48, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
Satisfaction view
[edit]Good work on the satisfaction view! --Flex 03:07, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Justification
[edit]Thank you for your note on my page. The one thing I would suggest is keeping a separate Lutheran section --- as Lutherans draw a bright line between Justification and Sanctification, they do not fit well under a simple protestant umbrella, given the number of groups that teach sanct. first, then just,; just. & sanct. together; just. & sanct. all together in one big ball; other variations. I'd be happy to work on that section. Thank you for your concern for this article and your time! --Rekleov 23:13, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Difference between Butterflies and Moths
[edit]Sorry, I dont have the exact scientific data to give. I've noted your point and rewritten the article keeping this in view. If we get the exact inputs, we must put it up on the wikipage for accuracy, context and contrast. Regards, AshLin 18:40, 23 May 2006 (UTC)
Good Article Nomination (Justification)
[edit]Hi Jrcagle, I took a more serious look at the Justification article and I've posed several suggestions on the comments section. I've also nominated it for "Good Article" status. I think with the improvements and actions I've suggested it'll make the cut and will be able to finally jump out of the "B"-class rank. Nice work up to this point. Nswinton 21:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Smile
[edit]
James, La gloria è a dio has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Ichthus: January 2012
[edit] |
ICHTHUS |
| January 2012 |
In this issue...
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here