User talk:Jesusmariajalisco

Sleep Apnea

My homemade treatment of chewing gum before sleeping and drinking milk before sleeping. The gum will exercise your tongue and prevent it from falling. When you drink milk it must be cool, not warm. If apnea is obesity induced, then sleep mouth facing the pillow but with your face looking left, not right. This way, your body fat will not crush the few strenght remaining on your lungs. Cocoliras (talk) 04:53, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Jesusmariajalisco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! SJP (talk) 07:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Mine.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Mine.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 20:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NAFTA

Let me know what you think about this. Alex Covarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 20:31, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user supports NAFTA.

Not at all! This userbox was created for everybody to use it, if they feel like it. Thanks for your comment. Alex Covarrubias ^{( Talk? )} 20:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

==

Your recent edits to List of best-selling music artists

Hi, I just wanted to let you know that all reliable sources must comprise a total sales-figure within supporting the sales-bracket the artist's placed in. Unfortunately, this source does not have to do anything with sales-figures. And I translated the Biography section, and it talks about some figures; however, it's not enough to be accepted even for 50-74 section. Regards.--Harout72 (talk) 02:48, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please, do not keep adding Luis Miguel to List of best-selling music artists as this is Luis Miguel's official web site , therefore we cannot use this per WP:RS and the the Warner Music Mexico's site which is supposed to be this according to you in edit summary does not contain the 52 million figure within the biography section.--Harout72 (talk) 22:45, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding, unfortunately, the sources that you are suggesting on my talk page are not reliable. I'd like to give you some examples of what are the reliable source that we should be looking for to support the artists at List of best-selling music artists: They could be published by either U.S. or foreign major papers/magazines such would be CNN, BBC, Billboard, The New York Times, Wall Street Journal. We could also use figures posted within the web sites of major record companies for example: Warner Music (which you made an attempt on but lacked the sales figure), Universal, Sony/BMG or even MTV, VH1 (again they don't necessarily have to be published in English language). You could look at the sources that we have accepted so far here. By the way, I was able to locate one German source for Luis Miguel stating over 50 million records. This may be, however, last updated a few years back, if you can't find any we could use this for now, let me know. Here it is: Warner Music Germany.--Harout72 (talk) 03:21, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Latin American GDP per Capita (PPP) figures as per the IMF

One of the ways to calculate the GDP (PPP) for a specific country is to take the value of all final goods and services produced within that nation in a given period of time and divide them by the average population for that period of time. That period of time could a year, half a year, a quarter and even a month.
While I could see that updating the table with 2009 figures could be to a certain degree far-fetched, the 2008 figures are quite realistic. Considering that the year has less than 10 days to end, I don't think it's a stretch to post those figures now, much less I would consider them misleading.

Anyway, thanks for updating the nominal GDP, I was going to that sometime this week. Likeminas (talk) 03:14, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The figures are correct. See this link; http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2008/02/weodata/weorept.aspx?sy=2008&ey=2008&scsm=1&ssd=1&sort=country&ds=.&br=1&c=336%2C213%2C263%2C268%2C343%2C273%2C218%2C278%2C223%2C283%2C228%2C288%2C233%2C293%2C238%2C243%2C248%2C366%2C253%2C369%2C298%2C258%2C299&s=PPPGDP&grp=0&a=&pr1.x=19&pr1.y=6

Thanks for updating the HDI. Good work... Likeminas (talk) 21:38, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AEXA

Hello, could you please provide me or the Space Agencies article with a reference of the yearly budget to the Mexican AEXA?. Thank you. -BatteryIncluded (talk) 23:41, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Latin America Demographics

Hello, there is one thing I have to clarify you. Because 56% of Argentines have a at least one Amerindian ancestor, that doesn't make them Mestizo. According to another study, the average Argentine has 18.1% Indigenous contribution, but if you add the old Spanish Casta system, Argentines are considered White. The Casta is not used today for determining Class, but it is sometimes now use to determined Race. Yes, you are right that there are White Americans with Black and Indigenous ancestry, but does that make them Multiracial? I hope that this clarifies my reason for removing Argentines and Uruguayans from Mestizo (another is that it was placed by a bad-faith editor). Thank you for reading. Lehoiberri (talk) 01:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Thank You

Well, thank you for that, Jesus. I echo the sentiment, as I look forward to working with you. If you have a question and think I could help, ask away. All the best to you. Happy Editing! SamEV (talk) 21:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jesusmariajalisco/Michelito Lagravere

I've userfied what looked like a mostly blank page. I'm unclear from the logs what was actually happening: First I saw no history, then some from April? Regardless, I'll be happy to move it back when it is ready. - brenneman 05:25, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Latin America

Hey!

I saw your last two edits there. But the sources are a problem, because they're other Wikipedia articles, which goes against policy. ("Articles and posts on Wikipedia, or other websites that mirror Wikipedia content, may not be used as sources."Wikipedia:SPS) You should therefore cite the sources in those articles. I didn't do it myself because I like to verify (and preferably peruse) sources before I add them, which takes more time than I have right now (I'd like to get to many other articles this evening).

Hasta luego. SamEV (talk) 04:16, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

White people

Hi Jesusmariajalisco, I invite you to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:White_people#Racism to discuss claim that Caucasians/Caucasoids other than Europeans, such as Somalis, Tuaregs or Malayalis, could be thought of as "white". Maijinsan (talk) 10:37, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

List of space agencies

Could you please explain me why you reverted my changes in the List of space agencies? - José Gnudista (talk) 08:13, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually my friend, the Mexican Space Agency should be left out of the article until you guys prove that it exists already. "The burden of evidence lies with the editor who adds or restores material", per Wikipedia:BURDEN - José Gnudista (talk) 22:16, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Julieta Venegas

I'm just following Wikipedia guidelines. It just doesn't make sense to call her a "Mexican American". To me, a Mexican American is someone born and raised in the United States, or even a Mexican-born person who is a citizen of the United States. In Julieta's case, it's vice versa, she was born in the United States, but was raised in and is a citizen of Mexico, so it would make more sense to call her an "American Mexican" than a "Mexican American", no? -- Lancini87 (talk) 03:26, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You apparently didn't understand what i said above. It's simple, the only thing American about Julieta is that she was born in the United States, but she is a Mexican citizen, and those Mexican Americans you mentioned are not. That's the difference. -- Lancini87 (talk) 20:38, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Graciela beltran

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. As the article namespace is for encyclopedic content and not tests, the page you made will soon be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. RadioFan (talk) 00:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Denmark–Mexico relations‎;

Do you have ny references that can be added to Denmark–Mexico relations‎? --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 17:38, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

BRIC

As i said the values with mathematical scaling estimates (ruler) with Charts and Figures. It all their in the update and if you want disagree with some of the numbers, measure it and edit it accordingly. Don't try and censor values from one global economic paper over the other..this is updated projections.Cosmos416 19:52, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You 2 are the same user...I'm not I said I measure the Chart Value using a Mathematical Scale. Accurate. Measure for yourself.Cosmos416 20:20, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on BRIC. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution.

June 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an edit war at BRIC. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. — Aitias // discussion 10:22, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Latin American subnational entities by Human Development Index

The article List of Latin American subnational entities by Human Development Index has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not only Argentina and Chile use different methodology, but every country has its own methodology. When the UN built its list of HDI, it makes using the GDP per capita adjusted per power purchasing parity to avoid discrepancies in the exchange rate. This list doesn't use a standard methodology, so it should be deleted. See the the source of each country to see that each one uses its own methodology. Furthers explanations can be seen [on the talk page].

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Camaron · Christopher · talk 21:35, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Latin America tables

¡Saludos y feliz año nuevo, Jesús!

Looking at these reverts of yours, [1], [2], [3], I've just had an epiphany: why not turn those tables into templates? Then let's ask all the frequent, good-faith editors to add the templates to their watchlists. If necessary, we'll ask for semi-protection for the templates. What do you think? Imagine not having to undo all those ridiculous edits seemingly every day. SamEV (talk) 23:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SamEV Feliz año to you as well. I think it would be wonderful to have the tables in templates as well as having them semi-protected. Most of the templetes are vandalized almost daily. With a semi-protection it would give us a little more time to foucus on other edits. It would be great if you can get it done. Jesusmariajalisco (talk) 02:16, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Me? Oh, great! [mild sarcasm was intended here] :(

I can't say when exactly, but I'll try it soon. Remind me next week if I don't have them by then; but I doubt I'll wait till then.

And did you really mean that the *templates* get vandalized almost daily, or did you mean the *tables*?

Also, maybe the solution could lie in having the article itself semi-protected. (And no, I'm not suggesting that in order to avoid making those templates, hahaha). After all, there's vandalism to more than just the tables, in the article. What do you think? As you may know, I've been absent from the article since I took a break last spring, so I don't know if protection was ever sought during that interval. SamEV (talk) 12:24, 5 January 2010 (UTC); 22:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

¿Qué tal?
After an inordinate amount of procrastination (and btw, you didn't remind me that next week), even for me, I decided not to template the tables, for two reasons: 1) the problem has basically disappeared, in the meantime; 2) my reluctance to use templates, generally, because they slow down page load time.
We're working on new versions of the economic and ethnicity tables. Stay tuned. SamEV (talk) 22:24, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. All of my edits to the Latin America article have been cited with authoritative sources and appropriate links, so your assertions are inaccurate. Please take greater care to investigate my edits in the future. Cheers! Pristino (talk) 18:11, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I decided not to use the GDP per capita figures on page 22 of the PricewaterhouseCoopers document, because it only includes four Latin American cities (Mexico City, Sao Paulo, Buenos Aires and Rio de Janeiro). What I did was I used population estimates for 2006, published by City Mayors. Because the GDP data are for 2008 and the population data are for 2006, the calculated GDP per capita figures may not accurately reflect the actual GDP per capita for 2008, as I noted in a footnote below the table in the article. I tried to find a reliable source for 2008 population estimates for world urban agglomerations, but was unsuccessful. I realize combining two sets of data from different years to yield a new result is not recommended, but it was the best compromise I could find. I could have very easily calculated my own 2008 population estimates based on population growth trends, but I decided against it, because that would have constituted original research, which Wikipedia forbids. Have a good day. Pristino (talk) 06:34, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Latin America

Hi! I am having a little problem in the article Latin America with editor SamEV about Brazilian demographics. The main article about Brazil explains that the "Pardo" population is a a broad category that includes sub-categories such as the Mullattoes, Caboclos (known as "Mestizos" in Hispanic-America) and Cafuzos (known as "Zambo" in Hispanic America). In the Latin America article there is a table that says that 39.1% of Brazilian population are "mulatto" when the correct should be "Pardo". I explained that carefully in the talk page (See Talk:Latin America#Conflict with editor SamEV) but editor SamEV not only ignored my remarks but insist on reverting all my edits. I also tried to reach his in his own talk page but he simply erased my message. That is not a helpful behavior of his. I should had simply requested to an administrator to block him per the 3 eevert rules and asked for an arbitration since his behaving as his owns the article. However, I want to avoid that since the issue is something very simple, that is, nothing more than to clarify the table that present Brazilian demographics. As it is know, it says that there are 0% Caboclos or Mestizos (the majority of the population in Northern Region, Brazil, Northeast Region, Brazil and Central-West Region, Brazil) and 0% Cafuzos or Zambos. Could you, please, share your thoughts about it in the article talk page? Thank you very much, --Lecen (talk) 10:42, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alan sanchez (boxer)

The article Alan sanchez (boxer) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Evaders99 (talk) 07:29, 24 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alan sanchez (boxer), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TKO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Jesusmariajalisco. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jesusmariajalisco. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]