User talk:Groznia

My talk page

Taiwan population

Hi Groznia. I have again reverted this change, because it contradicts the source cited for the population, which says "The current population growth rate for Taiwan is small at 0.18%." That is, a slight increase. Kanguole 10:48, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mayyas (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by I dream of horses were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not well sourced. Probably not notable yet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mayyas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Groznia! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses (Contribs) (Talk) 04:49, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Nouman Ali Khan does not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits a summary may be quite brief.

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Snuish (talk) 04:16, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swahili language, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages English, German and Portuguese. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

refusing to discuss on the talk page in religion of eritrea

You have given no reason for why your reverting the edits when everything is clearly reliable and sourced the only other reason is that your pov pushing 2A02:C7C:30D9:C400:689E:EC6E:4731:A70E (talk) 20:18, 4 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 5 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Finland. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You cannot threaten to report people when you are not even taking part in talk page discussion refuting points, continue to do so and you will be the one reported. TylerBurden (talk) 12:22, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It would seem you are already blocked for edit warring on a seperate article, you should let that be a lesson to take part in discussions instead of just claiming everything the opposing editor is saying is invalid and reverting. TylerBurden (talk) 12:25, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TylerBurden and Daniel Case,

He is doing it again on the "Religion in Mauritius" and "Mauritius" pages. Regards Varoon2542 (talk) 13:50, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Luxembourg government

Hello, I saw you have gone in the Luxembourg page and change Grand Duke to Monarch. Please note as Luxembourg is a Grand Duchy therefore, it is led by a Grand Duke. Thank You, LuxembourgLover LuxembourgLover (talk) 15:06, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

what is your exact issue on Religion in eritrea

We did the same in religion in nigeria why not here? Whats wrong with having two estimates? 2A02:C7C:30D9:C400:6745:82EE:9699:2839 (talk) 14:17, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to find a consensus on the talk page first Groznia (talk) 16:29, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I did it twice which you ignore your the only one who object use the talk page so we can get consensus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7C:30D9:C400:161D:BF9C:CA41:EE31 (talk) 17:11, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All was added was a graph and the arda statistic having two graphs are fine either remove the graph or put its dishonest to place only one when the statistic differ so much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7C:30D9:C400:5566:F657:1E84:5285 (talk) 12:03, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Religion in Equatorial Guinea has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Religion in Equatorial Guinea. Thanks! Eternal Shadow Talk 23:38, 14 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ARDA and Pew religion data

Hello Groznia,

Please refrain from adding data about religion demographics from the ARDA and Pew, as they are not reliable, even more so when they replace census data or data from thoroughgoing census-like surveys. The ARDA and its projections are reproductions of the World Religion Database aka World Christian Database (they are the same), which are ultimately produced by the Gordon-Conwell Theological Seminary. Pew's latest data for all countries are those collected in 2010; no newer data have been produced since, apart from data for religion in the United States, and Pew's sets of data from 2020 to 2050 (Pew-Templeton Global Religious Futures) are pseudodata projections (WP:CRYSTAL). The issue has been already discussed multiple times; the latest discussion is this one and together with other users we have been considering the deprecation of these sources. Best regards, Æo (talk) 17:49, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. US Department of State (state.gov) and CIA World Factbook data are also unreliable. They often do not cite their sources (when they do, such as in this Latvia case, please cite the actual original source, in this case, for instance, the Latvian Ministry of Justice), and frequently their sources are the aforementioned ARDA or Pew.--Æo (talk) 18:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

howw was the exit in religion in eritrea disruptive?

Both me and Unionsa1 agree with the edit in adding arda statistic as well as graph as both are from the 2020 estimate. The arda statistic is not mentioned in the faith and denomination section so its not repeating nothing so you should have no issues here. 2A02:C7C:30D9:C400:551D:74EF:5E87:7D7A (talk) 14:30, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Rajputbhatti per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Rajputbhatti. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Girth Summit _(blether) 14:07, 23 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Religion in Equatorial Guinea

Hello, Groznia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Religion in Equatorial Guinea, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Religion in Equatorial Guinea

Hello, Groznia. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Religion in Equatorial Guinea".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 19:33, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]