User talk:GreatLeader1945
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
NPOV
[edit]Really? JayCubby Talk 01:39, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- It is completely egregious that you are marking some of these as minor edits. They are not, so cut that out at a bare minimum please. Remsense ‥ 论 02:17, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to AGF, but I can't think of any other possibilities for @GreatLeader1945's username. JayCubby 02:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, that doesn't seem like it would necessarily be the case to me. Remsense ‥ 论 02:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- You are most likely right. I simply see instances of what I feel are not encyclopedic in her contribs. I dunno. JayCubby 02:36, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, that doesn't seem like it would necessarily be the case to me. Remsense ‥ 论 02:27, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- I'm inclined to AGF, but I can't think of any other possibilities for @GreatLeader1945's username. JayCubby 02:23, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
December 2024
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Esolo5002 (talk) 00:27, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't the first time this user has unilaterally moved pages without discussion. They've been asked to stop in the past and haven't listened. At some point sanctions may be appropriate. seefooddiet (talk) 00:41, 4 December 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.