Jump to content

User talk:GeorgeMHall

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Can you cite a source for birth location for David Kneeland, American distance runner? Bkjunior (talk) 02:30, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, GeorgeMHall, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Bcschneider53 (talk) 03:40, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

[edit]
Hi GeorgeMHall! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 03:42, Monday, February 19, 2018 (UTC)

Mission 1 Mission 2 Mission 3 Mission 4 Mission 5 Mission 6 Mission 7
Say Hello to the World An Invitation to Earth Small Changes, Big Impact The Neutral Point of View The Veil of Verifiability The Civility Code Looking Good Together

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Donahue (racing driver) (2) (May 21)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TryKid was:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Only two sources aren't enough.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
TryKid (talk) 10:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, GeorgeMHall! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! TryKid (talk) 10:22, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Johnny Klausmeier) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Johnny Klausmeier, GeorgeMHall!

Wikipedia editor Willsome429 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thank you for creating the page about Klausmeier. Please take note of changes I made, including the Birth date and age template and the formatting to make sure that citations are always after punctuation.

To reply, leave a comment on Willsome429's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 17:41, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Fury Race Cars) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Fury Race Cars, GeorgeMHall!

Wikipedia editor Willsome429 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

I will make some minor copyedits but otherwise this looks good. Thanks for making a page for an emerging Xfinity team.

To reply, leave a comment on Willsome429's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 01:42, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kevin Donahue has been accepted

[edit]
Kevin Donahue, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 19:30, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2017 ARCA Racing Series, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justin Haley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kevin Donahue) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Kevin Donahue, GeorgeMHall!

Wikipedia editor Willsome429 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nice work. If you can find some stuff about his pre-Truck days, that'd be great, if not, it's still a fine article.

To reply, leave a comment on Willsome429's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 00:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm L293D. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Lonesome George— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:18, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So sorry, this was my error. L293D (☎ • ✎) 02:19, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Demarre McGill

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Demarre McGill requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://demarremcgill.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. S Philbrick(Talk) 00:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Reid Wilson

[edit]
Notice

The article Reid Wilson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable newcomer to the sports scene. No evidence of any awards or independent coverage from non-insider sources. Probably WP:TOOSOON.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nick Moyes (talk) 22:19, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Indygo Arscott for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Indygo Arscott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indygo Arscott until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 04:53, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indygo Arscott at July 2018 Doug Ford rally.png

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ian Hendrickson-Smith.png

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:10, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Demarre McGill March 2012.png

[edit]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. RonBot (talk) 17:22, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Indygo Arscott at July 2018 Doug Ford rally.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Indygo Arscott at July 2018 Doug Ford rally.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Demarre McGill March 2012.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Demarre McGill March 2012.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ian Hendrickson-Smith.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ian Hendrickson-Smith.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Codie Rohrbaugh) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Codie Rohrbaugh, GeorgeMHall!

Wikipedia editor Willsome429 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

A bit more content on his ARCA career would be nice, I think he's at 20ish starts and has some good finishes.

To reply, leave a comment on Willsome429's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:09, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2019 NASCAR Gander Outdoors Truck Series) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating 2019 NASCAR Gander Outdoors Truck Series, GeorgeMHall!

Wikipedia editor Willsome429 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

The page looks good as of now but next year I'd wait until some drivers are announced for competition.

To reply, leave a comment on Willsome429's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:12, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2018 Johnsonville 180) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating 2018 Johnsonville 180, GeorgeMHall!

Wikipedia editor Willsome429 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Overall a solid page. There were two practice sessions but only two cars went out in the first one.

To reply, leave a comment on Willsome429's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:17, 10 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Jason White (Canadian racing driver)

[edit]

Hi, I'm Willsome429. GeorgeMHall, thanks for creating Jason White (Canadian racing driver)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Childrens' names shouldn't be included on the page - just mention of them is sufficent

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:26, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Demarre McGill March 2012.png

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Demarre McGill March 2012.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

  1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
  2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 17:28, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Demarre McGill March 2012.png

[edit]
⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Demarre McGill March 2012.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:39, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Brian Kaltreider

[edit]

Thanks for creating Brian Kaltreider.

A New Page Patroller Willsome429 just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

Some more prose on his ARCA career would be nice - if I recall correctly, he fielded a ride for Jefferey Earnhardt once upon a time. Otherwise it looks good!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 20:59, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

[edit]

Hello, GeorgeMHall. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Justin Shipley) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Justin Shipley.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

If you could find some info about Shipley outside of NASCAR, that'd be nice, otherwise the page looks good.

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 19:58, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Alexandra Ridout

[edit]

Thanks for creating Alexandra Ridout.

A New Page Patroller Rosguill just tagged the page as having some issues to fix, and wrote this note for you:

The subject's notability is borderline, and seems to rest entirely on the award that they have won. I was able to find some additional coverage here that may help to expand the article and provide sufficient coverage to satisfy WP:GNG.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can reply over here and ping me. Or, for broader editing help, you can talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 22:26, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Birth dates

[edit]

I see you are adding birth dates. They need to be sourced. Birth dates are private confidential information unless they can be sourced to a verifiable public source. -- GreenC 01:20, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Bryant Barnhill) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Bryant Barnhill.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process.

Thank you for creating the page with multiple independent, reliable sourcesz

To reply, leave a comment here and ping me.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 02:12, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kevin Meendering) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Kevin Meendering.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Thank you for creating the page. A bit more on his background before Sadler would be great but otherwise the page looks good.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Willsome429}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 21:00, 21 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Julien Nkoghe Bekale) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating Julien Nkoghe Bekale.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice stub, there are some Reuters/Bloomberg articles on Julien that I would also use as it would help non-Gabon readers. thanks.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Britishfinance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Britishfinance (talk) 10:53, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Carmen Duncan

[edit]

Sorry If my edits caused edit conflicts on Carmen Duncan. Just wanted to let you know that I am done with improving Carmen Duncan, you can continue your edits there. I have commented out content that are not sourced. Please do not expose them without adding reliable sources. thanks. --DBigXrayᗙ 20:04, 3 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2019 Boyd Gaming 300 moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, 2019 Boyd Gaming 300, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 18:42, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2019 Boyd Gaming 300 (February 24)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:
Not ready for review. Portions of this draft are missing or incomplete.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Xfinity/Truck race reports

[edit]

I noticed you started making widespread race reports for Xfinity and Truck series races. While some more memorable races are most certainly worthy of pages (even the K&N race 2018 NAPA Auto Parts Idaho 208 for its significance), I'm struggling to see how many of these races pass WP:NOTSTATS. There is very little prose on these pages, and they are simply stat pages of times and places. The Boyd Gaming 300 page was already moved to draftspace once, and pages like 2019 JEGS 200 look awfully silly just sitting there over a month before the race. I, personally, do not think these pages are fit for inclusion on Wikipedia due to the fact that oftentimes, very little coverage comes out of the races besides your usual finishing order/short recap, which is not notable for inclusion. If you can prove to me that these pages should stay, I will entertain your thoughts. Otherwise, I may bring the issue to WT:NASCAR to try and gain a broader consensus from the community. Regards, Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 15:27, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Willsome429: I believe these pages are notable since, although they only show statistics right now, they could be expanded to include some more prose (such as history about the races or the tracks at which they are held). Also, I had decided to make race reports for the Xfinity and Truck series races because I noticed that the Cup series races all have their own race reports (most of which are written by A.lanzetta and created weeks and occasionally months before the race, such as 2019 GEICO 500 and 2019 Toyota Owners 400), and simply wanted to maintain consistency throughout the project by creating reports for all three of NASCAR's national divisions. Thanks, GeorgeMHall 02:46, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The pages for the Cup races were made because of sufficient coverage surrounding the events - and because corresponding F1 Grand Prix events and IndyCar races also had individual pages. With the Xfinity and Truck races, there is simply not enough coverage to merit their own pages. WP:SIGCOV dictates that it needs to be in-depth and independent, not PR, so NASCAR.com, Catchfence, Speedway Digest, etc. don’t work as significant, reliable coverage. Most of the race pages for Xfinity and Truck events are in shambles - little/no sourcing, little/no prose. Ideally, that’s where mini race summaries should wind up with the one/two in-depth analysis pieces written about the contest. Indy Lights and F2 face the same hurdle - there’s simply not enough significant coverage to make pages worthwhile. (IndyCar’s WikiProject is undermanned this year, so unfortunately neither of their events so far have pages. If you have an interest in that series, they need as much help as they can get.) If you wouldn’t mind developing an Xfinity/Truck page to what you would call fully developed, I can take a look at it and I may rescind my arguments. But it’s also a huge time commitment and as of right now I don’t think the pages in their current form merit inclusion in the encyclopedia. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 03:35, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Mexican Runner's birthplace

[edit]

Hi!

I've been looking for a citation for his birthplace, but I couldn't find one. I have heard people say he was born in Xalapa, but I really would like to be able to cite someone about this. How did you find this? JordiGH (talk) 18:16, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2020 NASCAR Gander Outdoors Truck Series) has been reviewed!

[edit]

Thanks for creating 2020 NASCAR Gander Outdoors Truck Series.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Please provide sources.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 04:34, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2020 NASCAR Gander Outdoors Truck Series for deletion

[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 NASCAR Gander Outdoors Truck Series is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020 NASCAR Gander Outdoors Truck Series until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kpgjhpjm 07:38, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Khalid al-Aruri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palestine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:35, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Sean Harris. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 11:44, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi George, I noticed that you visited my page Frederick Grinnell (biologist). I also noticed the page still has autobiography tag after 9 years. Doesn't someone eventually check that all the content is accurate and removed the tag? Fred Grinnell Fgrinnell (talk) 05:05, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Thérèse Dion. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Echoing NinjaRobotPirate's warning from a few days ago. Praxidicae (talk) 18:41, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

BLP discretionary sanctions alert

[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:59, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"1995 NASCAR Nationwide Series" listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 1995 NASCAR Nationwide Series. Since you had some involvement with the 1995 NASCAR Nationwide Series redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 01:58, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Irving Bentley, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ludlow, Vermont (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:41, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020 WikiProject NASCAR newsletter

[edit]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:27, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020 WikiProject NASCAR Newsletter

[edit]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:20, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020 WikiProject NASCAR newsletter

[edit]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020 WikiProject NASCAR newsletter

[edit]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:57, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject NASCAR September 2020 newsletter

[edit]

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Weirsky

[edit]

I started a draft about Michael Weirsky. Can you please make it a full article that is a good article or featured article, please? I would prefer it to be featured article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Michael_Weirsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by LotteryGeek (talk • contribs) 00:34, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removed comma after birth date

[edit]

Don't remove commas after birth dates! Vedant04072005 (talk) 16:35, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hell's Kitchen Italia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Roma and Lodi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Renier Gonzalez

[edit]
Notice

The article Renier Gonzalez has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG, with the first source being a primary source and the other three not meeting WP:SIGCOV.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JML1148 (Talk | Contribs) 05:12, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited World Blitz Chess Championship 2022, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Riazantsev.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Zinnober9 (talk) 00:48, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph Balderrama moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Joseph Balderramais not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 12:05, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

updating peak FIDE ratings

[edit]

Hi – thanks for updating the peak FIDE rating for Gabriel Sargissian at List of chess players by peak FIDE rating (in this edit). When you do that, please also update the date in the next column that says when this peak was achieved. (I already did it in this case.) Joriki (talk) 08:27, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, GeorgeMHall. Thank you for your work on Luis Ernesto Quesada Pérez. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:43, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Austin Yang Ching-Wei, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. B3251 (talk) 19:14, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Birth dates on BLPs

[edit]

Please review our policy on posting full birthdates on BLP's. I reverted your edit on Liubov_Kostiukova as it appeared to me to violate WP:BLPPRIVACY. Cheers! BBQboffin (talk) 03:20, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Joseph Balderrama 2

[edit]

Hello, GeorgeMHall. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Joseph Balderrama 2".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:04, 12 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

[edit]

Information icon Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Iulia_Mashinskaya. I had to remove another full birthdate on that you added today. Thanks you for your other improvements to the article, but please read and follow the WP:BLPPRIVACY policies With identity theft a serious ongoing concern, many people regard their full names and dates of birth as private. Wikipedia includes full names and dates of birth that have been widely published by reliable sources, or by sources linked to the subject such that it may reasonably be inferred that the subject does not object to the details being made public. BBQboffin (talk) 01:15, 15 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, GeorgeMHall. Thank you for your work on Robin Swinkels. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:49, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

[edit]

Hello, GeorgeMHall. Thank you for your work on Robby Kevlishvili. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 22:40, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrolled granted

[edit]

Hi GeorgeMHall, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Ϫ 06:23, 23 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

your update of Vincent Keymer's rating

[edit]

Hi – I'm wondering about this edit you made to update Vincent Keymer's rating. It was already on November 27 (don't the ratings usually get published on the last day of the month?), and the new rating was 4 points below what the list for December currently says. Joriki (talk) 17:57, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. I had noticed on November 27 that there were already December ratings published for players but I guess they were not the finalized ones. GeorgeMHall 18:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
OK, thanks. I also fixed it in the list of chess players by peak FIDE rating. Joriki (talk) 19:55, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing FIDE rating parameter from infoboxes

[edit]

Hello! I see you frequently remove the FIDE rating parameter from infoboxes. Please stop doing this. Among other issues, it gives the impression that those players are inactive. Thanks! Sportsfan77777 (talk) 07:41, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was doing this because the rating parameter isn't actually used since the FideID parameter automatically fills in the rating for 2400+ players, though I can see how it can make players below that rating seem inactive. GeorgeMHall 08:06, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, for 2500+ players who are not going to fall below 2400 any time soon, it might be okay. But I see you also do it for lots of players under 2400, and that's not okay. Sportsfan77777 (talk) 09:10, 30 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yuanling Yuan

[edit]

Hello. She moved to Canada when she was 5. At this age she did not even know the rules of chess. Yet you gave her the category Chinese chess player. I thought this was about what federation a player plays for, not about nationality. --Gereon K. (talk) 12:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, I'll reverse this. Thanks GeorgeMHall 19:15, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Custom signature fix needed

[edit]

Hi there! You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. Changes to Wikipedia's software have made your current custom signature invalid.

The problem: Your signature contains a syntax error or obsolete HTML tags.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, you can fix your signature, or you can do nothing.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box.
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (Do not click the red "Restore all default settings" button, which will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Click the Learn more button next to the error to learn how to fix the error.
  3. Update your signature to fix the error.
  4. Click Save to update to your newly fixed signature.

Solution 3: Do nothing:

  1. In accordance with a recent request for comment, all invalid signatures will be changed to the default, which looks like "Example (talk)", one month from now.

If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:05, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nikolay Averin for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nikolay Averin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nikolay Averin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

signed, Rosguill talk 20:02, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join New pages patrol

[edit]

Hello GeorgeMHall!

  • The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
  • We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
  • Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
  • Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
  • If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:20, 22 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lars Ootes

[edit]
Notice

The article Lars Ootes has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent reliable sources, just clubs and tournament organisers. Nothing useful on Google News. Fails WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 08:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lars Ootes for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lars Ootes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lars Ootes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 07:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elijah Everett for deletion

[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elijah Everett is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elijah Everett (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

BluePenguin18 🐧 ( 💬 ) 17:13, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

World Blitz Chess Championship
added a link pointing to New York
World Rapid Chess Championship
added a link pointing to New York

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cyril Marzolo

[edit]

Hello, GeorgeMHall. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Cyril Marzolo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:03, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Shamkir Chess

[edit]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Shamkir Chess, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 06:05, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GeorgeMHall&oldid=1248739049"