User talk:Elysium0820
Welcome!
[edit]
|
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
A brownie for you!
[edit]
|
 Thanks for helping out with the page Soju. I have some contributions there that you have found with minor typos, and I wanna personally thank you. Happy editing. EraKook (talk) 17:19, 27 November 2020 (UTC)
|
Wow thanks for that:) And regarding the typos on the 'Soju' article - no worries mate I'm happy to help, especially in ways that can increase Western/Anglophone readers' comprehension of beautiful cultural phenomena they're less likely to be familiar with;) Elysium0820 (talk) 12:15, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi!
[edit]Hi! Re:[1], Are you by any chance aware of WP:NOTBROKEN? --Guy Macon (talk) 13:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hi! No - I've not heard of this " WP:NOTBROKEN " actually. What is it about? Elysium0820 (talk) 12:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Please click on the ---> WP:NOTBROKEN <--- link and read it. You have been "fixing" links that aren't broken. Please don't do that. --Guy Macon (talk) 15:55, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
After a painstaking review of everything, I regret that you're mistaken. I've not been "fixing links that aren't broken". I actually don't even know what that means.
Whilst reading a Wikipedia page that contains an unfamiliar subject (including but limited to: proper nouns, specialised terminology, obscure concepts, etc.) it is important to provide other readers a means of arriving at the existing Wikipedia page dedicated to that subject.
As such, upon confirming that such a page does indeed exist on Wikipedia, I merely edit by placing [[ ]] around the unfamiliar subject. I then test this edit by clicking on the newly added link - so long as it appears BLUE - to confirm that it does lead to the extant Wikipedia page. However if the link appears RED then I immediately know there has been some minor error of syntax in my edit which thus created a "broken link". This is my only experience of having created a "broken link" (albeit, briefly + unintentionally) in my Wikipedia edits. I always correct these straight away by re-editing my edit, which has only ever been a matter of fixing my own typo in the specialised/unfamiliar term OR fixing autocorrect-induced syntax errors which caused the "broken" (RED) link. Elysium0820 (talk) 22:27, 12 September 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kesari (Ramayana), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gokarna. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Severe combined immunodeficiency, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moroccan.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:52, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for February 23
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Autophagy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fruit fly.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 26
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trousseau sign of malignancy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phlegmasia.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
Contentious topics alerts for American politics post 1992 and living persons
[edit]Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
You have recently made edits related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 11:46, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 29
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Moritz Steinschneider, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moravian.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 29 September 2024 (UTC)