User talk:Durgaprasadpetla

This is Durgaprasadpetla's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kambala Srinivas Rao (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kambala Srinivas Rao and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:DoubleGrazing,

I hope this message finds you well. I recently noticed that my account has been blocked, and I would like to respectfully request a review of this decision.

This is my first article and I understand that Wikipedia’s policies and guidelines are in place to ensure the integrity and neutrality of its content. If I have inadvertently violated any of these policies, I sincerely apologize. It was not my intention to cause any disruption or go against community standards.

I would greatly appreciate it if you could provide further clarification about the reason for my block. If the issue is related to my recent edits or contributions, I am more than willing to make the necessary corrections and comply with all relevant guidelines moving forward.

Wikipedia is a valuable platform for sharing knowledge, and I am committed to contributing in a constructive and policy-compliant manner. Please let me know if there are any steps I can take to address this matter or regain editing privileges.

Thank you for your time and understanding. Durgaprasadpetla (talk) 05:10, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Durgaprasadpetla! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kambala Srinivas Rao (September 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Guessitsavis were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please make significant changes before resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kambala Srinivas Rao and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sincerely, Guessitsavis (she/they) (Talk) 12:05, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Please do not move pages around, unless you're sure you know what you're doing. If you're not sure, please ask eg. at the Teahouse.

Also, do not create multiple copies of the same article/draft.

Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am a beginner on Wikipedia and need some help. I was trying to edit the Talk:Kambala Srinivas Rao page, but I encountered a message saying it was deleted under G8 (talk page of a deleted page).

I would like to know:How can I address content or discussions related to the deleted page appropriately?

Are there specific steps I should follow to create or request the recreation of the article itself?

Thank you Durgaprasadpetla (talk) 14:16, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Durgaprasadpetla. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:51, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

December 2024

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Durgaprasadpetla, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Durgaprasadpetla|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:21, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kambala Srinivas Rao, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:01, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. 331dot (talk) 14:16, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note that you are claiming you personally took and personally own the copyright to this professional looking image of Mr. Rao, so please tell your connection to him. 331dot (talk) 14:20, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. 331dot (talk) 08:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just to say that I intend to block you for failing to respond to multiple queries about your likely conflict of interest. I will not, however, block you yet, as that would prevent you taking part in the Articles for Deletion discussion which has now been opened on Kambala Srinivas Rao. You therefore have until the closure of that discussion to respond, after which I will block you without further notice. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:11, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not bludgeon the AfD discussion, or I will block you now, rather than wait until the discussion closes. I left you unblocked during this discussion so that you can participate in it; I guess I should have specified participate constructively. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:43, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, enough already. You really shouldn't have deleted that AfD discussion, that was the last straw. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:47, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Kambala Srinivas Rao

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Kambala Srinivas Rao requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. QueerEcofeminist🌈 15:53, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kambala Srinivas Rao (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article was deleted a few days ago, and still does not meet notability guidelines. Please do not resubmit without making significant changes and carefully reviewing the policies linked alongside this message. You also *must* disclose your conflict of interest, if any, per the many messages on your talk page. This draft will not be published without resolution of those issues.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kambala Srinivas Rao and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 07:06, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Durgaprasadpetla (talk) 07:22, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Used neutral language and removed subjective phrases.

Nomination of Kambala Srinivas Rao for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kambala Srinivas Rao is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kambala Srinivas Rao until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 07:26, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

January 2025

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 17:48, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators: if this block includes a Volunteer Response Team ticket number, this block was placed as part of the conflict of interest VRT queue and the user must not be unblocked without the express consent of a user with access to the queue.