User talk:Deblinis

August 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Trans-Europe Express (album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

s Stephen Morris On His Top 13 Albums". ''Thequietus.com''. 7 December 2010. Retrieved 1-08-2013}}</ref>
transeurope_express|work=Rolling Stone|date=November 1, 2003|accessdate=October 22, 2009|title=253) Trans-Europe Express: Rolling Stone}}</ref>

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:40, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Boy (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Time Out

Trans-Europe Express (album) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Stephen Morris

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kraftwerk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prodigy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:43, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject U2 invitation

Hello! This message is to inform you that Wikipedia:WikiProject U2 needs your input! Please, join this discussion on this talk page!

You may add yourself to our member list below by clicking here!

Project U2 member list

Melicans (talk · contribs) 14:11, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dream out loud (talk · contribs) 16:35, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Pjoef (talk · contribs) 16:43, 10 February 2008 (UTC) The 80s, from Boy to Rattle and Hum plus the ONE Campaign[reply]
Y2kcrazyjoker4 (talk · contribs) 03:05, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lemurbaby (talk · contribs) 03:01, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Difop (talk · contribs) 20:26, 19 October 2012 (WEST)
Miss Bono (talk · contribs) 11:53, 14 November 2012 (UTC) The entire career of the band plus Bono and Ali Hewson.[reply]
Cullen328 (talk · contribs) 22:10, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Teancum (talk · contribs) 14:08, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
PBASH607 (talk · contribs) 03:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Mayast (talk · contribs) 19:32, 5 February 2014 (UTC) Upcoming songs and album (2014)[reply]
c_meindl (talk · contribs) 10:45, 6 February 2014 Taking a WikiPedia class and had to join a WikiProject. I am interested in supplementing song stubs and articles!
atuldeshmukh1 (talk · contribs)
Calidum (talk · contribs) Wish I had seen this sooner. 01:00, 11 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Fylbecatulous (talk · contribs) returning to active status; just based on a feeling... Fylbecatulous talk 15:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
[[User:<Pushandturn>|<Pushandturn>]] ([[User talk:<Pushandturn>|talk]] · [[Special:Contribs/<Pushandturn>|contribs]]) 00:57, 1 May 2019 (UTC) optional: Im a longtime U2 fan and I went to the U2 360 tour and love sharing their music!

Miss Bono^[zootalk] 16:12, 15 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The xx, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Yazoo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: W:u2

Sorry I am late. I am always off on weekends, because I only have access to Wikipedia at work. I'd like to explain to you (now that we are going to work together in WP:U2) that I have a poor Internet conection at work and no Internet at home. I can only access Wikipedia, (not even Commons or the other wikis, just Wikipedia). I contribute using U2 by U2 (I have a copy) and fixing stuffs in the article. My mentor User:Cullen328 and a friend of mine User:Pjoef provide me information posting it in a mentorship page, so I can save it and work with it in my computer (after I remove the copyrighted info from Wikipedia). Sorry if this causes you a huge bother. I'd like to know what you think. Do you think we can work together without problems?

PS: Sorry for my English if it's bad. It's not my native language.

Thanks,

Miss Bono^[zootalk] 12:30, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kate Bush, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andy Bell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Deblinis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Deblinis. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing sources from Kraftwerk

Notability does not apply to sources and there are reasons for multiple sources for some material. Please discuss major revisions like this on the talk page first.- Mr X 🖋 18:29, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please, stop removing my edits and do provide a wiki rule when arguing. Next post at the talk of Kraftwerk. Deblinis (talk) 19:00, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kraftwerk. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Mr X 🖋 18:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you keep removing sources? You need to use the talk page for edits when an editor objects. Don't simply reinstate your edit. Do you understand this?- Mr X 🖋 19:01, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Deblinis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Deblinis. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Noise rock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Selfstudier (talk) 11:20, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anat Schwartz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Jazeera.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:1RR at Israel–Hamas war

Hi; at topics related to the Israel-Arab conflict, editors are restricted to one revert every 24 hours: An editor must not perform more than one reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes or manually reverses other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.

In the past 24 hours you have made two reverts:

06:35, 7 March 2024‎ (Reverted 05:44, 7 March 2024‎)
08:46, 6 March 2024 (Reverted 19:09, 5 March 2024)

Please self-revert 06:35, 7 March 2024‎ to bring yourself into compliance with WP:1RR. BilledMammal (talk) 06:50, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for self-reverting. I also agree with Selfstudier; seeing 1RR as an allowance, rather than a bright line that you cannot cross, may lead you into trouble in the future. BilledMammal (talk) 08:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Good idea to self revert. Re edit summary "Not allowed, 90 minutes left", I suggest that you do not view the 1R as an allowance, the idea should not be that the 90 minutes go by and then you can do it but instead do not edit war if you can avoid it. One can always initiate a talk page discussion. Selfstudier (talk) 07:16, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary

This edit summary is in breach of WP:CIVIL. Please desist. Coretheapple (talk) 00:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Might be" means that is not an assertion and this [1] is a comment about that edit, it is not about a person. Deblinis (talk) 00:54, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is needlessly inflammatory. Please don't use a summary like that again. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:1RR at multiple articles

At Jeffrey Gettleman:

At Screams Without Words:

Please self-revert 00:56, 13 March 2024, 03:33, 11 March 2024, and 04:03, 11 March 2024, and please remember that you need to self-regulate here; you can't consistently violate WP:1RR even if you do consistently correct violations when asked to. BilledMammal (talk) 01:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No "Extended confirmed protection" at Jeffrey Gettleman. Deblinis (talk) 01:58, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And there wasn't any revert at Screams Without Words, there is only text added

Here [2] a " was added

here [3] a text was added at the beginning of the sentence

Here [4] a text was added at the end of the sentence. Deblinis (talk) 01:59, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1RR applies to all edits within the Israel-Arab conflict topic area broadly construed, including the ones you made at Jeffrey Gettleman, regardless of whether there is extended confirmed protection - Each editor is limited to one revert per page per 24 hours on any edits made to content within the area of conflict..

Please see the diffs I provided for Screams Without Words; the diffs you are discussing are different to the ones that I have linked as reverts. BilledMammal (talk) 02:01, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1RR applies to any content related to the topic area, whether or not the article is protected. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:03, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Jeffrey Gettleman"; done.

Three changes at Screams Without Words; done. - Deblinis (talk) 06:04, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for self-reverting - however, self-reverting and then a day and a half later re-implementing your edit for the third time (first, second) is generally not appropriate; 1RR isn't an allowance, it's a restriction.

I was more concerned by today's sequence of events at Israel-Hamas war; you violated 1RR with 08:33, 16 March 2024, having first reverted at 09:09, 15 March 2024. After MakeandToss asked you to self-revert you did so, only to re-implement your edit four minutes later. I would suggest you self-revert your reinstatement and get consensus on the talk page. BilledMammal (talk) 10:20, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Self revert. Done. Deblinis (talk) 11:31, 16 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]