User talk:Cwmhiraeth/Archive 8
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |
DYK for Milicia excelsa
![]() | On 2 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Milicia excelsa, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that seed of the African teak tree is largely dispersed by fruit bats? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Milicia excelsa. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for Talk:Battle of Grunwald (painting)/GA1
Thanks! By any chance, would you consider helping with some prose issues I have at another GA of mine, Talk:Prussian Homage (painting)/GA1? I am not a native speaker, and there are some issues that I simply cannot fix myself, and those are the ones that the reviewer there listed. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 16:42, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- I will have a look at the article you mention. What surprises me is how good your English is (and the English of various other editors for whom it is not their native tongue) and it makes me ashamed to think how feeble we are in the United Kingdom at speaking any language other than our own. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:10, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- I have been through the article and have made a number of alterations to the prose. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help. And about English... well, it is the global language. No other one matches it with regards to importance, so I think that's a valid excuse :) --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 21:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- I have been through the article and have made a number of alterations to the prose. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:56, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I see that lately you are editing this article intensively. Do you plan to take it all the way to the GA/FA? I am working now on the Russian version of the article and compare the data with English version which is pretty well developed. I would be rather pleased if you could notify me of any major error you find in the existing data. Thank you, Sir Shurf (talk) 07:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I do intend to take Frog to GA/FA. I have been working on it for some time and I do not think that it currently contains information not backed up by reliable sources. Good luck with your article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
- Very well, thank you, Sir Shurf (talk) 09:58, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Comatulida
![]() | On 8 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Comatulida, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that if an arm of a feather star (pictured) breaks off, then at least two will grow to replace it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Comatulida. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 08:02, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
Neutral notice of an RfC
A Request for Comment has been posted for an article on which you have been an editor. If you wish to comment, go to Talk:List of African-American firsts# Request for Comment: Pro wrestling. --Tenebrae (talk) 12:00, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
- As far as I know I have never edited this article. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:19, 9 August 2012 (UTC)
Peer review exchange
Hi Cwmhiraeth, like what you have done with frog. I am a herpetologist and willing to peer-review your article, but was hoping for a trade in the deal. Would you be willing to come and peer-review ecology? I have been working on the ecology article for a long-time and you seem like the right person for the job. I'll review frog anyway, but wanted to draw you to ecology since it seems to be in your area of interest anyway. Thanks.Thompsma (talk) 18:53, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will have a go at peer reviewing Ecology. As you say, this is certainly a subject that interests me. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:18, 11 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Cwmhiraeth! I might come across as being harsh in my peer review comments. Please do not take any of it personally. I know I used to hate getting critical feedback, yet I know that I give very harsh and pointed feedback. Feel free to call me out if you think I am wrong, because often times I can be. It is just my writing style and it puts some people off. I'll do my best, however, to help out as much as I can and hopefully my tough review will make the FA simple.Thompsma (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh...I'm moving this week and all my herpetology textbooks are in boxes. I might be away for a week or two as I move and unpack. I have a full and complete collection of herpetology texts (over 1000 books) - I collect them. So I can use these resources to give you any information you need if you can't access a book or citation.Thompsma (talk) 06:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- I will work on the points you raise in the review and see if I can find some time in between to look at Ecology! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:37, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oh...I'm moving this week and all my herpetology textbooks are in boxes. I might be away for a week or two as I move and unpack. I have a full and complete collection of herpetology texts (over 1000 books) - I collect them. So I can use these resources to give you any information you need if you can't access a book or citation.Thompsma (talk) 06:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Cwmhiraeth! I might come across as being harsh in my peer review comments. Please do not take any of it personally. I know I used to hate getting critical feedback, yet I know that I give very harsh and pointed feedback. Feel free to call me out if you think I am wrong, because often times I can be. It is just my writing style and it puts some people off. I'll do my best, however, to help out as much as I can and hopefully my tough review will make the FA simple.Thompsma (talk) 06:25, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Don't give up on ecology, you are doing a great job.Thompsma (talk) 05:21, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
WikiProject Wikify and the future of wikification
Hi! There is an ongoing proposal at the project talkpage concerning the future of wikification, including possible deprecation of the {{wikify}} template which is being discussed at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 August 10. Your input would be greatly appreciated!
You are receiving this message because you are listed as an active member of the wikify project. To update your status, go here.
Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:42, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Wikify
DYK for Agelas schmidti
![]() | On 12 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Agelas schmidti, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the brown tubular sponge often has a colonial coral living symbiotically on its surface? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agelas schmidti. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:03, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Parazoanthus swiftii
![]() | On 13 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Parazoanthus swiftii, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the golden zanthid, a colonial coral, often grows on the surface of the green finger sponge? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady (talk) 16:03, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Iotrochota birotulata
![]() | On 13 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Iotrochota birotulata, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the golden zanthid, a colonial coral, often grows on the surface of the green finger sponge? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Re: Tree
Hi Cwmhiraeth,
I too was puzzled by the extremely negative reaction to your rewrite of the Tree article, but I think I now have some advice: smaller edits, rather than a lot of work in your userspace seems to be best for an article like that one, that has high importance and has been entrenched for a long time, so people get very touchy about changes to it. Of course, an edit has to be big enough to make a point completely, but I think that is the key, divide them up by concept and use a very thorough edit description. Waiting for a couple of days before making the next edit also gives you a chance to step away for your own protection if there is a volley of insults. I've very sorry that this has happened to you. Best wishes, Sminthopsis84 (talk) 17:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. I had been wondering if that was the problem and will know not to proceed in the same way another time. There was a particular reason for treating the article in that way which was that I wanted to enter it for the Core contest, which runs through August, and did not want to start improving the article before the end of July. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:49, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- The edit I made today in tree and that you reversed was made because I came across these sentences in the Coevolution section of the article Ecology which I was helping to peer review:
- "Indirect mutualisms occur where the organisms live apart. For example, trees living in the equatorial regions of the planet supply oxygen into the atmosphere that sustains species living in distant polar regions of the planet. This relationship is called commensalism because many others receive the benefits of clean air at no cost or harm to trees supplying the oxygen." It was referenced to that journal article so I did likewise even though the abstract did not look promising. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:27, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
- Ah yes. I've substituted some citations on the Ecology page, unfortunately not particularly accessible ones, but authoritative and about the topic under discussion.
- Thank you for explaining about the Core Contest, I'll take that as a sort of warning to stay away from those. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 21:28, 13 August 2012 (UTC)
Sorry that I'm taking so long to look at this question properly, the time I have available for wikipedia gets used up rapidly by my watch list. However, the versions are all still there, so over the next month or two perhaps we can slowly build something that satisfies all. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 13:56, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Neofibularia nolitangere
![]() | On 16 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Neofibularia nolitangere, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that an individual sponge, Neofibularia nolitangere, may have tens of thousands of parasitic worms, Haplosyllis spongicola, living within its tissues? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Haplosyllis spongicola
![]() | On 16 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Haplosyllis spongicola, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that an individual sponge, Neofibularia nolitangere, may have tens of thousands of parasitic worms, Haplosyllis spongicola, living within its tissues? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Tree
Hi Cwmhiraeth, I'm sorry that the Tree edits are getting so rough on you. It is a touchy subject with anyone who has ever tried to teach biology. A real bang-head-on-laboratory-bench frustration sets in when one is grading student essays, and these facts that we consider so basic get mangled in so many different ways (like the "Meiosis produces a tetrad of microspores that develop into a pollen grain" from this web site which should have said "each of which develops into a pollen grain". Fixing errors is very difficult editing, and I'm afraid that you work too fast for me, I can't keep up. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 19:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Well it was a pity that I chose that source because I see now that it was unreliable. So I rewrote the section on gymnosperm reproduction this morning from a University source. I am trying my best to improve the article and think having the whole section blanked is very destructive and unhelpful. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:27, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- As a botanist who learned his botany nearly 50 years ago, you have my support. I don't take too kindly to the pedagogic style of editing that has emerged lately. We all make mistakes or are putting forward long outdated concepts (in my case anyway) - but to be met with sarcasm and blanking is no way to improve an article. I have been around on Wikipedia for more than 7 years and will probably still be here in another 7, still learning, still making some mistakes but hopefully still contributing constructively and improving articles. I fully expect my tenacity will outlive the tantrums of the newly come zealots ! Hwyl fawr. Velella Velella Talk 20:29, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- If you haven't taught lately, I think you would be amazed by the speed and tenacity with which students suck up and regurgitate material from wikipedia, and how difficult it is to persuade them that what they have "studied" is nonsense. So I agree with EauOo that it is far better to have a blank than to have misinformation. Anything that has been removed is still very accessible from the history of the page. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 20:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- When I wrote the rewrite I thought I was writing on a general topic, a tree, not a specialised botanical topic. The previous version was poor and if I had worked around it and just added further information on uses etc. it would have been better. I do also feel disappointed in the quality of the sources I used as I can see now that the information I derived from the book that I ueed for guidance, The World Encyclopedia of Trees by Tony Russell and Catherine Cuttler, has led me astray. For example, having talked about conifers and broad-leafed trees early on, it then went on to deal with the structure of the roots, trunk and leaves with no further reference to conifers being different from angiosperms. Other editors kept saying how wrong the article was but were unspecific about its faults which rendered it difficult for me to remove them. I enjoyed writing the article at the time but have not enjoyed the aftermath! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, there's a lot of dumbed-down-until-it's-wrong material on the Web that is quite distressing. If I wrote "mammals have fins" there'd surely be no shortage of people ready to correct it, but statements equivalent to "trees have flowers" or "grasses bloom in June" are so common in wikipedia that the few of us who work on these problems can't cope and consequently are rather touchy. The citation that I just added to lenticel seems to be an exceptional online botany site with enough detail to be good, though I've only looked at the one page.
- I did my best yesterday, but spent more time than I could afford and have other work that needs to be done, so I'm going to step away from Tree now. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 15:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- When I wrote the rewrite I thought I was writing on a general topic, a tree, not a specialised botanical topic. The previous version was poor and if I had worked around it and just added further information on uses etc. it would have been better. I do also feel disappointed in the quality of the sources I used as I can see now that the information I derived from the book that I ueed for guidance, The World Encyclopedia of Trees by Tony Russell and Catherine Cuttler, has led me astray. For example, having talked about conifers and broad-leafed trees early on, it then went on to deal with the structure of the roots, trunk and leaves with no further reference to conifers being different from angiosperms. Other editors kept saying how wrong the article was but were unspecific about its faults which rendered it difficult for me to remove them. I enjoyed writing the article at the time but have not enjoyed the aftermath! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:12, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
- If you haven't taught lately, I think you would be amazed by the speed and tenacity with which students suck up and regurgitate material from wikipedia, and how difficult it is to persuade them that what they have "studied" is nonsense. So I agree with EauOo that it is far better to have a blank than to have misinformation. Anything that has been removed is still very accessible from the history of the page. Sminthopsis84 (talk) 20:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 19
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Amphibian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to RDNA
- Frog (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to RDNA
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:39, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Frog FA review
Hi Cwmhiraeth...Just got your message. I would hold off on the FA review for a couple more weeks. I would say that it is definitely not ready. I've nominated a few articles for FA review and had them in better shape that frog is and they were shut down right away. I'm working all this week for a huge contract and will be out in the field most of the time. I will be popping in now and again, but might be too tired to help out. If you give me a couple of weeks and hold off I can help you get it up to par. There's still much to be done. Will check in when I get back from work. Take care.Thompsma (talk) 04:43, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
GOCE news and September drive invitation
Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in its events:
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 18:46, 21 August 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
The Bio-star | |
For highly meritorious effort in so greatly improving Amphibian and for contributions to the improvement of Tree Velella Velella Talk 15:00, 22 August 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you indeed for the Bio-star. I guess there are a number of editors who would say I didn't deserve it with regards to Tree. And by the way, my botany dates from the same period as yours. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Common toad
Out of curiosity, do you still plan to bring the the common toad article to FA? LittleJerry (talk) 18:07, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- Not really. I thought it might be too difficult to make it comprehensive enough and I thought the sub-species issue was difficult. What do you think?
- I am working on Frog instead with FAC in mind. It is currently in Peer review here if you have any comments. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:26, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think that all you need to do is get rid of those low-qaulity sources. It seems comprehensive enough. Are there major things you think you've missed? LittleJerry (talk) 19:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
- You are a very good persuader. I will give it a go! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:10, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- Good luck!! LittleJerry (talk) 20:24, 23 August 2012 (UTC)
- I think that all you need to do is get rid of those low-qaulity sources. It seems comprehensive enough. Are there major things you think you've missed? LittleJerry (talk) 19:59, 22 August 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Common toad (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Anorexia and Basque Country
- Amphibian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Extant
- Milicia regia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Petiole
- Rhabdias bufonis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Anorexia
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:09, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Milicia regia
Hello! Your submission of Milicia regia at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! PumpkinSky talk 20:52, 27 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Pteria colymbus
Hello! Your submission of Pteria colymbus at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Smallman12q (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Salientia
![]() | On 31 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Salientia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Salientia is a stem group of amphibians that includes the frogs and toads and various extinct proto-frogs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Salientia. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir (talk) 00:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Pteria colymbus
![]() | On 31 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pteria colymbus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that a study showed that cultivating the Atlantic winged oyster off the coast of Venezuela was not commercially viable? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pteria colymbus. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Black Mountain Salamander
![]() | On 31 August 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Black Mountain Salamander, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the female Black Mountain Salamander broods her eggs? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black Mountain Salamander. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
WikiCup 2012 August newsletter
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cd/Trophy.png)
The final is upon us! We are down to our final 8. A massive 573 was our lowest qualifying score; this is higher than the 150 points needed last year and the 430 needed in 2010. Even in 2009, when points were acquired for mainspace edit count in addition to audited content, 417 points secured a place. That leaves this year's WikiCup, by one measure at least, our most competitive ever. Our finalists, ordered by round 4 score, are:
Grapple X (submissions) once again finishes the round in first place, leading Pool B. Grapple X writes articles about television, and especially The X-Files and Millenium, with good articles making up the bulk of the score.
Miyagawa (submissions) led Pool A this round. Fourth-place finalist last year, Miyagawa writes on a variety of topics, and has reached the final primarily off the back of his massive number of did you knows.
Ruby2010 (submissions) was second in Pool B. Ruby2010 writes primarily on television and film, and scores primarily from good articles.
Casliber (submissions) finished third in Pool B. Casliber is something of a WikiCup veteran, having finished sixth in 2011 and fourth in 2010. Casliber writes on the natural sciences, including ornithology, botany and astronomy. Over half of Casliber's points this round were bonus points from the high-importance articles he has worked on.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) came second in Pool A. Also writing on biology, especially marine biology, Cwmhiraeth received 390 points for one featured article (Bivalvia) and one good article (pelican), topping up with a large number of did you knows.
Muboshgu (submissions) was third in Pool A. Muboshgu writes primarily on baseball, and this round saw Muboshgu's first featured article, Derek Jeter, promoted on its fourth attempt at FAC.
Dana Boomer (submissions) was fourth in Pool A. She writes on a variety of topics, including horses, but this round also saw the high-importance lettuce reach featured article status.
Sasata (submissions) is another WikiCup veteran, having been a finalist in 2009 and 2010. He writes mostly on mycology.
However, we must also say goodbye to the eight who did not make the final, having fallen at the last hurdle: GreatOrangePumpkin (submissions),
Ealdgyth (submissions),
Calvin999 (submissions),
Piotrus (submissions),
Toa Nidhiki05 (submissions),
12george1 (submissions),
The Bushranger (submissions) and
1111tomica (submissions). We hope to see you all next year.
On the subject of next year, a discussion has been opened here. Come and have your say about the competition, and how you'd like it to run in the future. This brainstorming will go on for some time before more focused discussions/polls are opened. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:11, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
GOCE September activities
Reminders from the Guild of Copy Editors
A quick reminder of our current events:
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Message delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:11, 1 September 2012 (UTC) |
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/ Lecythis ollaria at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:15, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Lecythis ollaria
![]() | On 1 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lecythis ollaria, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that eating paradise nuts can cause nausea, vomiting and hair loss? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lecythis ollaria. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Orlady (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Bufo eichwaldi
![]() | On 2 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bufo eichwaldi, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Eichwald's toad was first described in 2008, having previously been considered to be a subspecies of the Caucasian toad? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bufo eichwaldi. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Milicia regia
![]() | On 3 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Milicia regia, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the future of the tropical tree Milicia regia for timber production is threatened by a gall fly, Phytolyma lata? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Milicia regia. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:02, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Questions re DYK nomination for Lecythis ampla
Hello! Your submission of Lecythis ampla at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! —David Eppstein (talk) 01:59, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Incomplete DYK nomination
Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/ Davidaster rubiginosus, Davidaster discoideus at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 07:34, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Rhabdias bufonis
![]() | On 3 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rhabdias bufonis, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that infection with the parasitic nematode Rhabdias bufonis can cause host frogs to die? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Rhabdias bufonis. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nannophrys ceylonensis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vulnerable (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 4 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Clouded salamander
![]() | On 5 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Clouded salamander, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the clouded salamander stayed at home in Oregon while the wandering salamander travelled by bark from California to Vancouver Island? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Wandering Salamander
![]() | On 5 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wandering Salamander, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the clouded salamander stayed at home in Oregon while the wandering salamander travelled by bark from California to Vancouver Island? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 5 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Mexican burrowing caecilian
![]() | On 6 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mexican burrowing caecilian, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Mexican burrowing caecilian (pictured) is viviparous, with the young feeding on glandular secretions in the oviduct? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:02, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
Our Greatest Team Parade
Could your re-review the article as I've had to change a couple of things after looking at a new official source? Simply south...... eating shoes for just 6 years 17:13, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Black Salamander
![]() | On 7 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Black Salamander, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Black Salamander may defend itself by biting a western garter snake attacking it? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Black Salamander. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Danube bleak
![]() | On 7 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Danube bleak, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Danube bleak, a migratory fish, has had its traditional routes blocked by the building of dams? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Danube bleak. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Nannophrys ceylonensis
![]() | On 9 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nannophrys ceylonensis, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the tadpoles of the Sri Lanka rock frog and the Kirtisinghe's rock frog are often found on wet rocks near mountain streams? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Nannophrys marmorata
![]() | On 9 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nannophrys marmorata, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the tadpoles of the Sri Lanka rock frog and the Kirtisinghe's rock frog are often found on wet rocks near mountain streams? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Common toad
You have done a good job so far, but you just don't get a few things that are fundamental to writing the article.I will write what I can next week, and I asked for help at the wikiproject. Eau (talk) 09:24, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- I had a look at what you wrote at the WikiProject and the sort of help you mention there would be most welcome. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
- Good.
You have done a great job on the article and trying to work with people, if no one from amphibians can help, I will finish it up, still gotta wait at least a week. Take care. Eau (talk) 15:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
‑
Hi. I just replied on my talk. MOS:ENDASH is long-term stable guidance with wide support. If you've used ‑ in other articles, it's an easy fix. I'll help, if you like. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 11:50, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
A pie for you!
![]() |
I realize you already got a ton of barnstars, but I just have to give you kudos for drastically improving the Amphibian article, so I baked you this pie. Less than a year ago it was less than half the size it is today. I know I initiated the efforts to improve it but never thought someone would come along and do so much. Thanks a lot for your hard work! :) Cadiomals (talk) 15:44, 9 September 2012 (UTC) |
- Well, thanks. I'll enjoy that! I hope to get Amphibian at least as far as GA. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 15:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Davidaster rubiginosus
![]() | On 9 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Davidaster rubiginosus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the orange sea lily and the beaded crinoid conceal their bodies in crevices while they extend their arms to filter feed? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Davidaster discoideus
![]() | On 9 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Davidaster discoideus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the orange sea lily and the beaded crinoid conceal their bodies in crevices while they extend their arms to filter feed? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 16:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Your spam whitelist request
Hi, this is to let you know that your request at MediaWiki talk:Spam-whitelist has now been processed and will soon be closed and archived. To find the request, search for your username at that page. Stifle (talk) 17:32, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Heteromysis actiniae (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Brood pouch
- Kessler's Gudgeon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Substrate
- Ouachita Dusky Salamander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Rich Mountain
- Spotted cleaner shrimp (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Chela
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Ichthyophis glutinosus
![]() | On 13 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ichthyophis glutinosus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the larvae of the terrestrial Ceylon caecilian have gills and a tail fin and develop in water? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ichthyophis glutinosus. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir (talk) 00:02, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Frog
Hi Cwmhiraeth...Got your message. My internet is going to be hooked up tomorrow. There were a few cancellations. I just moved and started a new job. However, next week I will have time. My books are unpacked and I have a large reference section on herpetology and frogs in general. Next week I will plunge into the article and will assist to get it up to FA status. At this point I am absolutely certain that it will be quickly knocked down in a FA review - I have experience from other articles. I realize you want to enter into the WikiCup and would like me as a co-nominator, but at this point in time I do not think the article is ready. Sorry for being a nay-sayer at this point in time, but it will get there and I will be able to help. I just quickly popped in here to let you know. Take care.Thompsma (talk) 18:46, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, I will be patient. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Ouachita Dusky Salamander
![]() | On 14 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ouachita Dusky Salamander, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Ouachita Dusky Salamander, the Fourche Mountain Salamander, and the Rich Mountain Salamander are all endemic to the Ouachita Mountains in Arkansas and Oklahoma? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Fourche Mountain Salamander
![]() | On 14 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fourche Mountain Salamander, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Ouachita Dusky Salamander, the Fourche Mountain Salamander, and the Rich Mountain Salamander are all endemic to the Ouachita Mountains in Arkansas and Oklahoma? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Rich Mountain Salamander
![]() | On 14 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Rich Mountain Salamander, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Ouachita Dusky Salamander, the Fourche Mountain Salamander, and the Rich Mountain Salamander are all endemic to the Ouachita Mountains in Arkansas and Oklahoma? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 00:03, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Nostoc commune
![]() | On 14 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nostoc commune, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the cyanobacterium Nostoc commune can withstand desiccation and repeated freezing and thawing? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Nostoc commune. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
PanydThe muffin is not subtle 08:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)
GOCE mid-drive newsletter
Guild of Copy Editors September 2012 backlog elimination drive mid-drive newsletter
>>> Sign up now <<<
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 21:53, 15 September 2012 (UTC) |
Sandgrouse
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/36/DodoMansur.jpg/220px-DodoMansur.jpg)
Hi, I've now passed the article. I assume the GA logo is added automatically? I noticed one more thing that might be nice to briefly mention in the article under relations with humans (but isn't essential to the GA status at all), which is that a subspecies of the Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse appears to be extinct. Maybe briefly explain why, as it is most certainly human related? FunkMonk (talk) 08:42, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. I will investigate what you say about the Chestnut-bellied Sandgrouse subspecies.
- It tells you what you need to do when you pass an article under the section "Pass" on the GA page. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 08:59, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- Done. And by a fun coincidence, I just noticed that one of the "best" contemporary depictions of the Dodo (which I'm working on) also shows two Painted Sandgrouse in the lower right! FunkMonk (talk) 18:37, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
Reference clutter in Bivalvia
Please see the above; an editor tried to take a machete to some of the references as "clutter". Br'er Rabbit (talk) 19:31, 16 September 2012 (UTC)
- This guy is disruptively editing. He has again tried to machete the citation templates and someone else reverted him this time. I reverted two edits that cut sourced information. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 22:28, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
Common toad
I'm happy with the taxonomy, and I've already supported, not sure what you are asking me to do? Jimfbleak - talk to me? 09:02, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Pinna carnea
![]() | On 17 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pinna carnea, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the amber pen shell spends its adult life almost completely buried in the seabed in a single location? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Pinna carnea. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Lytechinus variegatus
![]() | On 18 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lytechinus variegatus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the green sea urchin (pictured) shades itself from the sun with bits of vegetation and shell but the jewel sea urchin prefers to hide in crevices during the day? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Lytechinus williamsi
![]() | On 18 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lytechinus williamsi, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the green sea urchin (pictured) shades itself from the sun with bits of vegetation and shell but the jewel sea urchin prefers to hide in crevices during the day? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Lecythis ampla
![]() | On 18 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Lecythis ampla, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the fruits of the Lecythis ampla tree resemble little wooden pots with lids? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Lecythis ampla. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Carpathian brook lamprey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Timis
- Chthonerpeton indistinctum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Migration
- Inga thibaudiana (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Calyx
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Brownea grandiceps
![]() | On 18 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Brownea grandiceps, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Rose of Venezuela (flower pictured) and Inga thibaudiana are trees that grow in seasonally flooded tropical forests? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Inga thibaudiana
![]() | On 18 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Inga thibaudiana, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Rose of Venezuela (flower pictured) and Inga thibaudiana are trees that grow in seasonally flooded tropical forests? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:02, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
2010 proposed taxonomy of the Bivalvia
Thank you for posting this important information to Wikipedia. A suggestion and a question:
It might be good to create a bridge page, or change the title to something beginning with "bivalvia" or "taxonomy, so that it will come up when someone types those words into the search box. The viewer statistics are dismal as it is now.
My question: The family sphaeriidae or pisidiidae (the little freshwater "fingernail" and "pill" clams) is not included in the listing. They are classified with the Corbiculacea in some older classifications. Were they left out of the Proposed Taxonomy? Also, would you be OK if some day I recast the listings to a tabulated form? Martino3 (talk) 03:35, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- The article 2010 proposed taxonomy of the Bivalvia was separated from the main Bivalvia article. I was not responsible for its original contents but any alterations would need to be appropriately sourced. I have no objection to the article's name being changed or you tabulating the information. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:10, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Oreaster reticulatus
![]() | On 19 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Oreaster reticulatus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the red cushion star turns part of its stomach inside out and engulfs sponges, other invertebrates and detritus? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Oreaster reticulatus. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir (talk) 08:02, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Diploria clivosa
![]() | On 20 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Diploria clivosa, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the fossilized remains of the knobby brain coral and the symmetrical brain coral have been found in Puerto Rico dating back to the Pleistocene? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Diploria strigosa
![]() | On 20 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Diploria strigosa, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the fossilized remains of the knobby brain coral and the symmetrical brain coral have been found in Puerto Rico dating back to the Pleistocene? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 00:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Chthonerpeton indistinctum
![]() | On 20 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chthonerpeton indistinctum, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the caecilians Chthonerpeton indistinctum and Typhlonectes compressicauda both give birth to live young? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Typhlonectes compressicauda
![]() | On 20 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Typhlonectes compressicauda, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the caecilians Chthonerpeton indistinctum and Typhlonectes compressicauda both give birth to live young? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Kessler's Gudgeon
![]() | On 20 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kessler's Gudgeon, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Kessler's gudgeon and the Danube gudgeon both have barbels by their mouth which help them in their search for food? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Danube Gudgeon
![]() | On 20 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Danube Gudgeon, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Kessler's gudgeon and the Danube gudgeon both have barbels by their mouth which help them in their search for food? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Heteromysis actiniae
![]() | On 21 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Heteromysis actiniae, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pederson's shrimp, the spotted cleaner shrimp and the anemone mysid are all found living in close association with the ringed anemone? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Bartholomea annulata
![]() | On 21 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bartholomea annulata, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pederson's shrimp, the spotted cleaner shrimp and the anemone mysid are all found living in close association with the ringed anemone? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:03, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Ancylomenes pedersoni
![]() | On 21 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ancylomenes pedersoni, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pederson's shrimp, the spotted cleaner shrimp and the anemone mysid are all found living in close association with the ringed anemone? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Spotted cleaner shrimp
![]() | On 21 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Spotted cleaner shrimp, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that Pederson's shrimp, the spotted cleaner shrimp and the anemone mysid are all found living in close association with the ringed anemone? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:04, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Elacatinus chancei
![]() | On 22 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Elacatinus chancei, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the shortstripe goby and the yellowline goby always live in association with a sponge? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Elacatinus horsti
![]() | On 22 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Elacatinus horsti, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the shortstripe goby and the yellowline goby always live in association with a sponge? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Fayum Sandgrouse
There's an entry for the extinct sandgrouse subspecies in the book Extinct Birds from 2012. It says 10 specimens were last seen in 1979, but that it is unknown why they went extinct. FunkMonk (talk) 11:23, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. I see you have added the information to the articles. I have since added your nice image with the dodo to Painted Sandgrouse. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:44, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Nectophrynoides viviparus
![]() | On 25 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nectophrynoides viviparus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that reproduction in the East African toads Nectophrynoides viviparus and Nectophrynoides laevis involves females giving birth to live young? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Nectophrynoides laevis
![]() | On 25 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nectophrynoides laevis, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that reproduction in the East African toads Nectophrynoides viviparus and Nectophrynoides laevis involves females giving birth to live young? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Echinometra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Urchin
- Nectophrynoides laevis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Tympanum
- Nectophrynoides viviparus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Vulnerable
- Orthasterias (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Knoll
- Pteraster tesselatus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Mucous
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:18, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Agathis atropurpurea
![]() | On 26 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Agathis atropurpurea, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Australian tree Agathis atropurpurea is known as the black kauri or the blue kauri because of the colour of its bark? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agathis atropurpurea. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
A. thiersii DYK
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
Message added Sainsf <^>Talk all words 00:54, 27 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Common toad
I see Common Toad has been promoted to FA, and, although I did not follow the edits, I saw that you had a good group of editors working on it from WikiProject Amphibian. Go forth and cookie them or something! I will be in the field almost continually for the next month, unexpectedly, so I was no help, but I feel more comfortable with dedicated amphibian editors doing the editing. Great choice of subject for FA. Eau (talk) 02:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for your help during the FA process. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:36, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
![]() |
The Fauna Barnstar | |
To Cwmhiraeth, for the article "Amphibian". Axl ¤ [Talk] 13:18, 28 September 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you for doing such a thorough review! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 17:46, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Caspian lamprey
![]() | On 28 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Caspian lamprey, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the migratory Caspian lamprey is more threatened than the freshwater Carpathian brook lamprey? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Carpathian brook lamprey
![]() | On 28 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Carpathian brook lamprey, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the migratory Caspian lamprey is more threatened than the freshwater Carpathian brook lamprey? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
Barnstar
![]() |
The Fauna Barnstar | |
To Cwmhiraeth for bringing Common toad to FA status. LittleJerry (talk) 01:13, 29 September 2012 (UTC) |
I hope you'll do more. Is starfish on your radar? LittleJerry (talk) 01:13, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. I couldn't have done it without the help of others. Starfish is trying for GA. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:56, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've been thinking of bringing some invertebrate (like octopus or scorpion) to FA status in the near future (likely spring 2013). Would you be interested in a collaboration? LittleJerry (talk) 01:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I would be glad to collaborate on one of those or something similar, but not before the end of October. For the moment I am concentrating my efforts on articles that can earn me points in my WikiCup bid. Talking of which, I have put Frog up for FA but so far there has been little response. Would you care to do a spotcheck as you did in the Common toad FAC? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:01, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks, I plan on getting two more mammal articles to FA before considering invertebrates. As for spotchecking. I don't think I'll need you since your not due for that for six months. LittleJerry (talk) 15:41, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I would be glad to collaborate on one of those or something similar, but not before the end of October. For the moment I am concentrating my efforts on articles that can earn me points in my WikiCup bid. Talking of which, I have put Frog up for FA but so far there has been little response. Would you care to do a spotcheck as you did in the Common toad FAC? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:01, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- I've been thinking of bringing some invertebrate (like octopus or scorpion) to FA status in the near future (likely spring 2013). Would you be interested in a collaboration? LittleJerry (talk) 01:50, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Solaster dawsoni
![]() | On 29 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Solaster dawsoni, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the morning sun star's (pictured) predatory attacks on other starfish are not always successful, as the velcro star and the rainbow star fight back and the slime star emits repellent mucus? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Stylasterias
![]() | On 29 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stylasterias, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the morning sun star's (pictured) predatory attacks on other starfish are not always successful, as the velcro star and the rainbow star fight back and the slime star emits repellent mucus? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Orthasterias
![]() | On 29 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Orthasterias, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the morning sun star's (pictured) predatory attacks on other starfish are not always successful, as the velcro star and the rainbow star fight back and the slime star emits repellent mucus? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:02, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Pteraster tesselatus
![]() | On 29 September 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pteraster tesselatus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the morning sun star's (pictured) predatory attacks on other starfish are not always successful, as the velcro star and the rainbow star fight back and the slime star emits repellent mucus? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:03, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
DYK nomination of Article
Hello! Your submission of Article at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yazan (talk) 07:25, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Ahnfeltia plicata
![]() | On 1 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ahnfeltia plicata, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the landlady's wig can be confused with the similar red alga Cordylecladia erecta, both of which grow on sand-covered rocks? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Cordylecladia erecta
![]() | On 1 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cordylecladia erecta, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the landlady's wig can be confused with the similar red alga Cordylecladia erecta, both of which grow on sand-covered rocks? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:05, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Luidia foliolata
![]() | On 2 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Luidia foliolata, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the sand star can move across the seabed at the fast speed of 280 centimetres (9.2 ft) per minute? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Luidia foliolata. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
FAC
You're not supposed to have two FAC nominations at the same time. (Good luck with "Amphibian".) Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:20, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- I can if one is a joint nomination, and Frog is. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:23, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ah, yes, you're right. :-) Axl ¤ [Talk] 10:42, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- I looked through the contribution history of frog, and it does not seem to me that Mark's input warrants a co-nom on the frog article. I understand he gave some of his valuable expertise at the peer review, but it looks like you're adding his name to be able to put up two candidates at FAC. If you disagree with my assessment, would you mind then if I worked on either the amphibian or the frog article for a few days myself and add myself to the FAC? Sasata (talk) 19:10, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
- I have now withdrawn the Amphibian FAC due to concerns as to whether I was contravening the FAC rules as my co-nominator in the Frog FAC might have been insufficiently involved in that article. I'll try again later. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 09:00, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Colostethus stepheni (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Amazon
- Ocoee Salamander (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Tallulah
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
WikiCup 2012 September newsletter
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cd/Trophy.png)
We're over half way through the final, and so it is less than a month until we know for certain our 2012 WikiCup champion. Grapple X (submissions) currently leads, followed by
Sasata (submissions),
Cwmhiraeth (submissions) and
Casliber (submissions). However, we have no one resembling a breakaway leader, and so the competition is a long way from over. Next month's newsletter will feature a list of our winners (who are not necessarily only the finalists) and keep your eyes open for an article on the WikiCup in a future edition of The Signpost. The leaders are already on a par with last year's winners, but a long way from the huge scores seen in 2010. That said, a repeat of the competition from 2010 seems unlikely.
It is good to see that three-quarters of our finalists have already scored bonus points this round. This shows that, contrary to criticism that the WikiCup has received in the past, the competition does not merely incentivise the writing of trivial articles; instead, our top competitors are still spending their time contributing to high-importance articles, and bringing them to a high standard. This does a great service to the encyclopedia and its readers. Thank you, and good work!
The planning for next year's WikiCup is ongoing. Some straw polls have been opened concerning the scoring, and you can now sign up for next year's competition. As ever, if you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK multiple nomination hook is too long
Ixalotriton niger, Ixalotriton parva, Pseudoeurycea praecellens, Thorius pennatulus, Pseudoeurycea smithi, The hook is 219 characters. Can you shorten it up, please?, Maile66 (talk) 12:29, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- In multiple hooks there is an allowance for greater length, see supplementary rule C3. Mikenorton (talk) 12:43, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you. I have proposed a slightly shorter hook anyway. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:51, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Echinometra viridis
![]() | On 3 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Echinometra viridis, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the sea urchin Echinometra viridis (pictured) hides in crevices while Echinometra lucunter and Echinometra mathaei dig themselves into the surrounding rocks? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Echinometra lucunter
![]() | On 3 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Echinometra lucunter, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the sea urchin Echinometra viridis (pictured) hides in crevices while Echinometra lucunter and Echinometra mathaei dig themselves into the surrounding rocks? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Echinometra mathaei
![]() | On 3 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Echinometra mathaei, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the sea urchin Echinometra viridis (pictured) hides in crevices while Echinometra lucunter and Echinometra mathaei dig themselves into the surrounding rocks? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:02, 3 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Leptasterias polaris
![]() | On 4 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leptasterias polaris, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the starfish Leptasterias polaris and Leptasterias tenera both brood their developing eggs? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Leptasterias tenera
![]() | On 4 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leptasterias tenera, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the starfish Leptasterias polaris and Leptasterias tenera both brood their developing eggs? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:03, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Common rocket frog
Hi there, I've reviewed your nomination at Template:Did you know nominations/Common rocket frog, Colostethus stepheni and found one minor issue that should be easy to fix. Once completed, could you drop me a note there to say it's done and I'll happy come along and give it a green tick. Thanks, Miyagawa (talk) 12:35, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Saccharum officinarum
![]() | On 4 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saccharum officinarum, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that sugar is extracted from the stems of Saccharum officinarum (pictured) and Saccharum barberi, but it is the flower heads of Saccharum edule that are eaten? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Saccharum barberi
![]() | On 4 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saccharum barberi, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that sugar is extracted from the stems of Saccharum officinarum (pictured) and Saccharum barberi, but it is the flower heads of Saccharum edule that are eaten? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Saccharum edule
![]() | On 4 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Saccharum edule, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that sugar is extracted from the stems of Saccharum officinarum (pictured) and Saccharum barberi, but it is the flower heads of Saccharum edule that are eaten? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Yngvadottir (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
GOCE September 2012 drive wrap-up
Guild of Copy Editors September 2012 backlog elimination drive wrap-up
Participation: Out of 41 people who signed up this drive, 28 copy-edited at least one article. Thanks to all who participated! Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here. Progress report: We achieved our primary goal of clearing July, August, September and October 2011 from the backlog. This means that, for the first time since the drives began, the backlog is less than a year. At least 677 tagged articles were copy edited, although 365 new ones were added during the month. The total backlog at the end of the month was 2341 articles, down from 8323 when we started out over two years ago. We completed all 54 requests outstanding before September 2012 as well as eight of those made in September. Copy Edit of the Month: Voting is now over for the August 2012 competition, and prizes will be issued soon. The September 2012 contest is closed for submissions and open for voting. The October 2012 contest is now open for submissions. Everyone is welcome to submit entries and to vote. – Your drive coordinators: Stfg, Allens, and Torchiest. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:32, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
|
DYK for Ixalotriton niger
![]() | On 5 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ixalotriton niger, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the black jumping salamander, the dwarf false brook salamander, the admirable false brook salamander, the Smith's false brook salamander and Thorius pennatulus are all endemic to Mexico, and critically endangered? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Ixalotriton parva
![]() | On 5 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ixalotriton parva, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the black jumping salamander, the dwarf false brook salamander, the admirable false brook salamander, the Smith's false brook salamander and Thorius pennatulus are all endemic to Mexico, and critically endangered? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Pseudoeurycea praecellens
![]() | On 5 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pseudoeurycea praecellens, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the black jumping salamander, the dwarf false brook salamander, the admirable false brook salamander, the Smith's false brook salamander and Thorius pennatulus are all endemic to Mexico, and critically endangered? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Thorius pennatulus
![]() | On 5 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Thorius pennatulus, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the black jumping salamander, the dwarf false brook salamander, the admirable false brook salamander, the Smith's false brook salamander and Thorius pennatulus are all endemic to Mexico, and critically endangered? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Pseudoeurycea smithi
![]() | On 5 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pseudoeurycea smithi, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the black jumping salamander, the dwarf false brook salamander, the admirable false brook salamander, the Smith's false brook salamander and Thorius pennatulus are all endemic to Mexico, and critically endangered? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk) 00:04, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Cumberland Dusky Salamander
![]() | On 5 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cumberland Dusky Salamander, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Cumberland Dusky Salamander is believed to hybridize with the Ocoee Salamander? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk) 08:02, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Ocoee Salamander
![]() | On 5 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ocoee Salamander, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Cumberland Dusky Salamander is believed to hybridize with the Ocoee Salamander? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Ophiothrix suensoni
![]() | On 5 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ophiothrix suensoni, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the sponge brittle star is often found living on the surface of the red tree sponge? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
DYK for Haliclona compressa
![]() | On 5 October 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Haliclona compressa, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the sponge brittle star is often found living on the surface of the red tree sponge? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Casliber (talk) 08:03, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | Archive 9 | Archive 10 | → | Archive 15 |