User talk:Cro ed

Welcome!

Hi Cro ed, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

Editing tutorial, learn to have fun with Wikipedia.

Picture tutorial, instructions on uploading images.

How to write a great article, to make it an featured article status.

Manual of Style, how articles should be written.

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

RC Patrol - Keeping a lookout for vandalism.

Cleanup - Help make unreadable articles readable.

Requests - Wanted on WP, but hasn't been created.

Merge - Combining duplicate articles into one.

Wikiprojects - So many to join, so many to choose from...Take your pick!

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 11:40, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of Arms of Hungary

Hi Cro ed,

I can see that you recently replaced "Hungary" by "Croato-Hungarian Union" in the article about the Coat of Arms of Hungary. I suppose your intent was to emphasize that Croatia was a separate political unit within the Kingdom of Hungary. However, the term "Croato-Hungarian Union" is neither widely used (either at that time or today), nor does it accurately represent the status of Croatia within the Kingdom of Hungary. I've changed it to "Kingdom of Hungary" which I believe is more accurate.

When you want to change something substantial in an article which may cause controversy, or which you yourself find biased (I'm assuming that this was the case here), it is best to propose your change first on the article's Talk page (which you can reach by clicking the "discussion" tab at the top of the page in question), and provide your arguments supporting the change. Then, if nobody objects, or the discussion shows a consensus supporting your change, you go ahead and make it.

If you check that article's talk page, you can see that I'm about to make major changes. Keep an eye on the article to make sure I'm not adding Hungarian bias. You can, for example, add the article to your watchlist by clicking the "watch" tab above the article (when logged in).

Last but not least, although I've only been around here for somewhat less than a month myself, welcome! :)

KissL 13:22, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marko, don't be discouraged, although your edit wasn't perfectly accurate, I think it was perfectly reasonable. I know that the Croatian nobles chose to enter Croatia into personal union with Hungary out of their own will, I just disagreed because the resulting state (we can call it "a state", since at that time this more or less meant the territories under a certain ruler – meaning the title not the person, but in this case the title was also united) was never really referred to as "Croato-Hungarian Union" (with the possible exception of Croatia maybe). As the common king was of a Hungarian descent and seated in Hungary, I think the inequality was inevitable without anyone "pressing their hegemony", but that is another story; luckily we needn't bother finding out why things turned this way :)

About the article, I think it was Alensha who wrote that up, but I'm pretty sure she didn't mean any harm but simply had a Hungarian POV, thus disregarding facts that are more important for the Croats. You are absolutely right that Croatia was not by any means "conquered", and therefore you were also right to edit that part ("Be Bold" is a guideline here anyway). I think this is the way Wikipedia works – you make sure that the articles don't contain inaccuracies about Croatia, I make sure they don't contain inaccuracies about Hungary, and in the end everyone (with a reasonable amount of common sense, that is) is happy.

I have nothing against Croatians either; I was very impressed by the warm, friendly, and welcoming attitude of the people in Primošten when I spent two weeks there in 2003, not to mention what a beautiful place it is (in fact, we even stayed three days longer than we originally intended, and only returned home because we had to go back to work). The Hungarians have long been renowned for their hospitality, but I think that recently, there is more and more room for improvement, and much to learn from you :) I can also add that if all our neighbours were like you, this part of Europe would surely be a happier place.

Finally about Euro'2012, we share the same hope :) And rest assured, whenever Hungary is not represented in an international football event (which is nowadays pretty much always, unfortunately), the Croatian nationals are my secondary preference :)

(A technical note: when you sign something, just type this: ~~~~. It automagically gets replaced by your username as a link to your userpage. I produced my signature below the same way.)

KissL 14:39, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Slovenia

Please, retrain from adding nonsense to the Slovenia article, even if you find it funny it is considered vandalism, and might lead to sanctions. Thanks for understanding, Mariano(t/c) 07:39, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Cibona.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Cibona.gif. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images on Wikipedia is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. You can get help on image copyright tagging from Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags. --OrphanBot 02:41, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

dinamo

Slušaj, nisam se došao svađati s tobom. Ovo je enciklopedija. Ona mora sadržavati nepristrane i objektivne informacije. Ako ti želiš napisati knjigu ili otvoriti blog u kojemu češ veličati BBB, slobodno, no ovdje nećeš. Oni, kao i sve navijačke organizacije imaju svoje pozitivne i negativne strane, ali neću prihvatiti da se iti jedna navijačka organizacija u Hrvatskoj sasvim neosnovano veliča. Ako se to tebi ne sviđa, tuži me. Ali, ako ti misliš da su BBB najveće civilizacijsko postignuće Hrvatske, onda se varaš, moj mali dječaće. Dobro se sjećam svih navijačkih tučnjava u Hrvatskoj. I otkad je BBB domovina? Što ti znaš o Hrvatskoj, moj dječaće? Što, odjednom si veliki Hrvat, a kada treba tući Splićane, Riječane, Zadrane, Osječane, Dubrovčane, onda češ kao prvi uskoćiti? Daj odjebi. Dinamo nije Hrvatska.

Hrvatska je Hrvatska. h3llbent

Kosovo

Please note that Kosovo is by the UN an autonomous province of Serbia and Montenegro, not just Serbia like you put. Why did you put it anyway? --HolyRomanEmperor 18:10, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sandzak

...the same applies to here. --HolyRomanEmperor 18:15, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This morning, at 9:00, Montenegro announced the final results of the refendum - although, all complains still have to be processed and the figure could still be applied.

Nevertheless, you made those changes long before even the preliminary results were complete, which is POV pushing (please read WP:NPOV and WP:POV). Additionally, the two Republics still form Union in a State Union - a mere referendum (that's still not finished) cannot change itself that. Best! --HolyRomanEmperor 13:37, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

El kondor pada and User:Dzoni

I've blocked user Dzoni indefinetly for continued incivility, and I also ask you to abstain from making provocative and non-constructive comments like [1] and [2]. This is not a general discussion website. Zocky | picture popups 10:29, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE STOP

Read wp:civil and do not, repeat, do not make abusive comments like this, or you may get blocked. Thank you --HolyRomanEmperor 09:51, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Igrac 443.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Igrac 443.gif. The image description page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 01:08, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to Defender

When you want to link to the article about the football position defender, please do not link to Defender, as that is a disambiguation page (which nothing should be linked to). Instead link to the Defender (football) article, by writing out [[Defender (football)|defender]]. Regards, -- Jeff3000 20:34, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hehe, don't worry, no Baha'i spells available! just striving for the world unity through the recognition of the oneness of humanity. -- Jeff3000 22:00, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Igrac 443.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Igrac 443.gif. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 20:35, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Quick Note

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

Dep. Garcia ^{(Talk to Me)} 20:53, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ćorluka.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ćorluka.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof 15:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Slovenia, part 2

Pelase, don't add nonsense to the article. It is considered vandalism. --Tone 08:46, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cibona.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cibona.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:45, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2007

Please do not vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Terje Hauge, else you will get yourself blocked from editing. Smalljim 12:16, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Hask.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hask.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We requires this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nk draga.gif)

Thanks for uploading Image:Nk draga.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 14:25, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Cro ed! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 691 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Ivan Šuker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:50, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:J vrankovic.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:J vrankovic.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 18:55, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Luka zoric.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Luka zoric.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:02, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:B bogdanovic.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:B bogdanovic.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:04, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bojan Bogdanović

The article Bojan Bogdanović has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Endofskull (talk) 22:35, 28 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Hnkgorica.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hnkgorica.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Skier Dude (talk 21:53, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:B bogdanovic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:B bogdanovic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Luka zoric.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Luka zoric.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

warning

In a 2007 arbitration case, administrators were given the power to impose discretionary sanctions on any user working on articles concerning the Balkans. Before any such sanctions are imposed, editors are to be put on notice of the decision. This notice is issued in view of your edits to Petar Preradović. It is not to be taken as implying any inappropriate behaviour on your part, merely to warn you of the Arbitration Committee's decision. Thank you.

See the content of the article Croatian Orthodox Church before you link it - it's got nothing to do with Preradović. Also you removed a reference - if you wish to dispute a reference, tag it with {{unreliable source}} and discuss it on Talk:Petar Preradović. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 16:37, 9 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NK Uskok for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NK Uskok is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NK Uskok until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 13:48, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of HNK Primorac Biograd na Moru for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article HNK Primorac Biograd na Moru is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HNK Primorac Biograd na Moru until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 13:57, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NK Neretvanac for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NK Neretvanac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NK Neretvanac until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 14:02, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NK Jadran Luka Ploče for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NK Jadran Luka Ploče is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NK Jadran Luka Ploče until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 14:05, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NK Jadran Kaštel Sućurac for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NK Jadran Kaštel Sućurac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NK Jadran Kaštel Sućurac until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 14:07, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NK Višnjevac for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NK Višnjevac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NK Višnjevac until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 14:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NK Slobodnica for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NK Slobodnica is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NK Slobodnica until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 14:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NK Buje for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NK Buje is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NK Buje until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. FiachraByrne (talk) 14:19, 25 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

HNK Suhopolje

I've undone your move of HNK Suhopolje because: 1) it is not a proper way to do it (page history is lost), and 2) there is no valid reason to move it. GregorB (talk) 17:26, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The official web page still says HNK Suhopolje - granted, there may be other, up-to-date sources that say otherwise. You'll need to file the move request at WP:RM and explain there why you want the page moved. GregorB (talk) 19:00, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Branko Hrg, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Križevci and Kalnik (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Ljubo Miličević, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Nath1991 (talk) 12:31, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Ljubo Miličević. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please add sources that show that the player has left the club. I have done a quick google and have not found a single source that shows that he has been released. Please provide references otherwise the edits will continue to be reverted and assumed as vandalism. Nath1991 (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Ljubo Miličević

Are these newspaper reports online? If so, send me the links and I'll fix up the references for you. You're not in any trouble, referencing just helps to Verify possible controversial statements, especially when editing biographies of living people. Thanks, Nath1991 (talk) 13:13, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK mate, looks credible enough. I'll undo a couple of edits, and add the source onto the end of it. Once again mate, I didn't mean to cause any offense by reverting your edits, however in order to keep Wikipedia verifiable, it always helps to have reputable sources when editing pages, especially biographies of living people (footballers) as it gives the article credibility and distinguishes it from vandalism. Once again mate, thankyou. Also, just a heads up - when making posts of users talk pages, always sign your posts by typing 4 tildes. :). Cheers, Nath1991 (talk) 13:40, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

HNK Vukovar 1991

Vidim da si ti prvi na Wikipediji objavio vijesti o gašenju HNK Vukovar 91 i osnivanju novog kluba sličnog imena. Stoga me zanima, je li novi klub već osnovan ili je osnivanje tek u pripremi?, jer na drugim web-stranicama piše da će klub tek biti osnovan, a ti si napisao da je to već učinjeno. Unaprijed zahvaljujem i pozdrav! --Ivan OS 15:38, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Velika Gorica.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Velika Gorica.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 16:35, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dražen Anzulović

The article Dražen Anzulović has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Specs112 t c 19:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Treća HNL (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Bistra and Požega

Hrvoje Perić (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Benetton Treviso

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 22

Hi. When you recently edited 2012–13 A-1 League, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Darda and Križevci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:12, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Samir Toplak, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 1. Bundesliga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of NK Trogir 1912 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NK Trogir 1912 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NK Trogir 1912 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Tikiwont (talk) 13:23, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 in Croatian football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited GKK Šibenik, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KK Jolly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 A-1 League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Križevci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of mayors of Osijek may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Treća HNL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bistra (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of HNK Val

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on HNK Val, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:05, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Treća HNL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Križevci (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:41, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Croatian help needed!

Hello Cro ed, I'm contacting you because we need some Croatian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Croatian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 23:00, 12 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 A-1 League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KK Jolly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Treća HNL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KK Vrijednosnice Osijek

The article KK Vrijednosnice Osijek has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ubiquity (talk) 15:15, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 A-1 League, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KK Jolly. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 8 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ABA Liga Category

Hi! I'm just dropping by to let you know about the new user category I think you might be interested in joining, ABA Liga supporters. Keep up the good work with your basketball-related contributions! --OxymoronNBG (talk) 21:42, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hy

Can you help please by creating and editing this page Football records in Croatia, I am interested in records in Croatian Football and I am asking you because you are from there. You can also read Association football records, records in other European countries here on wikipedia and have an idea how you should write. Thank you.Alexiulian25 (talk) 17:41, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Cro ed. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Cro ed. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of NK HAŠK

The article NK HAŠK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This Croation football club article has zero references to establish notability. After searching, found one not-reliable source and information of 1911 same name club, but no comprehensive, in-depth coverage of this specific club. Article was created on 12 February 2008.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Cro ed. Thank you for your work on NK HAŠK. Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add references

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 14:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]