User talk:Coreydragon
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Coreydragon, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Polocrosse
[edit]Thanks for your contribution (months ago) to Polocrosse. Could you add some more? References would be most helpful. Thanks! --Una Smith (talk) 05:46, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Reporters uncensored
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/1/15/Ambox_warning_pn.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_pn.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Reporters uncensored requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 16:10, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Removing Speedy at Reporters uncensored
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you created, as you did with Reporters uncensored. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please do the following:
Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:14, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- I've read the note you left on the talk page of the above-captioned article. Unfortunately, to be the subject of an article in Wikipedia it is necessary to already be notable, and this notability has to be demonstrated by reference to reliable sources, arm's-length sources of third-party opinion stating that the topic is somehow notable in a verifiable way. You may want to look at the links in this paragraph and WP:Your first article and WP:Why was my article deleted? for useful background information that will inform your future contributions. Accounting4Taste:talk 16:42, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (File:Reporters Uncensored.gif)
[edit]![⚠](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/34/Ambox_warning_blue.svg/35px-Ambox_warning_blue.svg.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Reporters Uncensored.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 08:46, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Reporters Uncensored
[edit]Reporters Uncensored TV | |
---|---|
Created by | Tala Dowlatshahi |
Country of origin | U.S. |
Original language | English |
Production | |
Executive producer | Maura Kelly |
Running time | 30 minutes |
Original release | |
Release | 2009 present | –
Reporters Uncensored TV is a weekly online news program that broadcasts alternative voices in global issues. It features contributions from an international network of journalists representing news services, NGOs and production companies. The show frequently broadcasts segments they produce, followed by interviews with representatives from the organization. It's producers are affiliated with Reporters Without Borders, Talk Radio News Service and PBS.
Season One
[edit]101 – Dafur and the International Criminal Court (ICC)
To coincide with the International Day of Justice, Reporters Uncensored talks to human rights activists about the recent ICC indictment of President Al-Bashir of Sudan for war crimes against humanity. Policy experts from the Save Dafur campaign discuss the crisis and review what still needs to be done.
102 - Iran, Elections and Twitter!
Reporters Uncensored looks at how Iran reformists use new media to mobilize Iranian citizens world-wide and get their story out.
103 - Afghan Marriage Laws: Fair or Foul?
Explores Afghanistan's conservative marriage laws and cases of sexual trafficking and abuse.
104 - Corruption, Money and the Environment.
To coincide with International Day of the World's Indigenous People, Reporters Uncensored looks at the battle for land rights in Peru’s rainforest, and government efforts to promote mining in the region. And while Ghana’s oil boom is getting world attention, RUTV visits local fisherman whose livelihoods are being threatened by officials, sometimes by brute force.
105 – World Racism: Summer of love and hate
Looks at world racism and the growing popularity of far-right national parties in politics.
106 – Iran’s Dark Secret: Child Prostitution and Trafficking
Explores the often overshadowed problem of the sexual trafficking of children and young women in Iran.
107 - Mexico's Murdered Journalists
Covers the ongoing war in Mexico between the federal government drug traffickers. Topics include government corruption and violence against journalists.
108 - The Rape of the Congo
Looks at recent accounts of ethnic violence in the Congo with a focus on victims of rape.
109 - Russia's Migrant Scapegoats
Explores the effect of Russia's economic downturn on the rise of neo-nazi groups and violence against migrant workers.
Reminder
[edit]Hey, I saw your edit on the Nobel Prize, great that you are helping out. However, please do not forget add an edit summary on what you have changed in your edit, it makes it easier for other editors to see what have been changed with the page when they are looking. Cheers, --Esuzu (talk • contribs) 09:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
November 2013
[edit] Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Comparison of webmail providers may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- | tabs (allowing to compose and view emails/settings/contacts etc. at the same time.
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:42, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 27
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chaim Dov Rabinowitz, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sodom. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, Coreydragon. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Coreydragon. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
English Channel
[edit]Apologies for the rollback, page jumped as I was trying to click on a diff. Have reverted myself. Mjroots (talk) 20:38, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- Oh not a problem at all :) Coreydragon (talk) 20:53, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ice cream, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mastic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:16, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
- Whoops, fixed –Coreydragon (talk) 11:19, 9 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Coreydragon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Coreydragon. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Properly close table
[edit]Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In your edit of 08:45, 1 February 2019 of 2004 United States Senate election in Georgia, you lost the markup {{Election box end}}
, which messed up the syntax (but did not affect the current display of the page) and put the page on Lint errors: Table tag that should be deleted. Also, in your edit of 08:44, 1 February 2019 of 2004 United States Senate elections, you inserted the markup {{Election box begin no change ...}}
without the corresponding {{Election box end}}
, which messed up the syntax (but did not affect the current display of the page) and put the page on Lint errors: Table tag that should be deleted.
If it interests you to help avoid these and other lint errors, see Wikipedia:Linter#How you can help and a following section, Wikipedia:Linter#User Javascript tool: lintHint. If you install lintHint, you can easily identify and fix lint in any article before you save your edits. Thank you again for your contributions to Wikipedia. —Anomalocaris (talk) 10:11, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 1
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tengrism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Semitic (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:29, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 14
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ben Gleib, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Late Late Show (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Edit Summary
[edit]Hi, thank you for your contributions! It would be better also for you to add an edit summary after you finish editing on the pages. "It is good practice to fill in the edit summary field, or add to it in the case of section editing, as this helps others to understand the intention of your edit." WP:FIES H:ES WP:ES Thank you. Chinogrids (talk) 07:10, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Mad Commas
[edit]I saw your edits at Sparks (drink). The same person is adding craaazzzy commas all over WP, plus other bizarre stylistic notions (I think they are a Spanish speaker). I have tried blocking dynamic ip's before and it is a lot of work for no return whatsoever, any ideas? Mr.choppers | ✎ 21:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
- @Mr.choppers: Thanks for reaching out! Yes, I have identified at least three IPs associated with that person based on the peculiarities of their edits and some of the specific pages they edit. (Personally I think they may be Indian/South Asian, but I can't be sure and suppose it doesn't much matter). No, I don't know how to precede; it's too much for me to bother fixing myself, and I couldn't find a definitive answer for how I should pass the buck on this specific problem. I wish I could be of more help. -Coreydragon (talk) 22:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
Origin of image used
[edit]https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Archangels.JPG#mw-jump-to-license
I’m wondering if the source and authenticity of this image can be verified. Thanks for your time. Ominousonomotapoeia-done (talk) 20:56, 9 May 2021 (UTC)