User talk:Contextbb

Welcome!

Hello, Contextbb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Http---www.springharvest.org-wp-content-uploads-2017-04-SH-blog-768x512.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Http---www.springharvest.org-wp-content-uploads-2017-04-SH-blog-768x512.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Http---www.springharvest.org-wp-content-uploads-2017-04-SH-blog-768x512.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Http---www.springharvest.org-wp-content-uploads-2017-04-SH-blog-768x512.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. A Great Catholic Person (talk) 20:49, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Conflict of interest in Wikipedia

Hi Contextbb. I work on conflict of interest issues here in Wikipedia, along with my regular editing. Your edits to date are on a bit of a run about Spring Harvest, and you have been edit warring, trying to add unsourced, promotional content to that article. You have an apparent conflict of interest for that topic. I'm giving you notice of our Conflict of Interest guideline and Terms of Use, and will have some comments and requests for you below.

Hello, Contextbb. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

• avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
• instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
• when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.

Comments and requests

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps - disclosure and a form of peer review. Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you need to do).

Disclosure is the most important, and first, step. While I am not asking you to disclose your identity (anonymity is strictly protecting by our WP:OUTING policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with Spring Harvest or the organization that puts it on, directly or through a third party (e.g. a PR agency or the like)? You can answer how ever you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, please disclose it. After you respond (and you can just reply below), I can walk you through how the "peer review" part happens and then, if you like, I can provide you with some more general orientation as to how this place works. Please reply here, just below, to keep the discussion in one place. Thanks! Jytdog (talk) 22:02, 29 April 2017 (UTC)

Please reply. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 17:12, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Restoring unsourced content

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Spring Harvest. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Jytdog (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi,

I am not at all a part of the Spring Harvest and/or Essential Christian brand. I have attended the Spring Harvest event as a guest for many years, and know for fact that all of the information is infact true. Hovever, as you have pointed out, there is no evidence of this. This is due to most of the information being retrieved from people that have attended the various events, and not published on the internet. This is a shame that these unsourced sections have to be deleted, as they are fact.

Just to point out that your use of "our range of events", and "our previous group name" in this edit:[1] would suggest otherwise to a casual reader' IdreamofJeanie (talk) 17:30, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Correct, that's because the information was taken directly from the Spring Harvest Website - http://www.springharvest.org/new-look-spring-harvest/

Thanks for replying. You have said what you have said about your involvement. Perhaps you are just a "fan" with no financial involvement.

In any case you must not copy from anything and paste it into Wikipedia. Please read WP:COPYVIO which we take very seriously.

I am sorry to be a little sharp here but pages within Wikipedia sometimes get hijacked and are no longer really part of the encyclopedia. We always try to reel pages like this one back in when we find them and sometimes it turns into a bit of struggle. You seem to 'get it" above, that content that is not reliably sourced cannot come in. I am grateful for that understanding. Jytdog (talk) 18:34, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Edit war warning

Your recent editing history at Spring Harvest shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jytdog (talk) 17:14, 30 April 2017 (UTC)

Other account?

Since you replied above, let me ask this... it appears that you opened a 2nd account, Pronoun22. Is that also you? Please do respond here. Thanks. Jytdog (talk) 18:53, 30 April 2017 (UTC)