User talk:Cmc0

Welcome!

Hello, Cmc0, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Flockmeal 21:21, Dec 8, 2004 (UTC)

PJ Patterson image

Hi. I noticed that you are the person who uploaded the image of PJ Patterson. I also noticed the google watermark on the image, and the fact that the file has no information about copyright. Could you supply the information please? Thanks. Guettarda 13:03, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Mapbig.jpg

This map would appear to be a copyvio from the Daily Telegraph. Do you have information on whether it has been released from copyright or are you claiming fair use? If so, how is it fair use? Dbiv 08:17, 13 Apr 2005 (UTC)

VfD

Removing "Votes for Deletion" notice is a disruption of wikipedia; inadmissible. Mikkalai 03:28, 21 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Tony Blair

Why do you keep reverting to the 10 year old image of Tony Blair? That is a copyrighted non-free image and shouldn't be used at Wikipedia, especially not when there is a free (and also much newer) image available. /Jebur 1 July 2005 21:54 (UTC)

Copyright conditions on Michaelle Jean picture

Hi! Please see Image_talk:20050804-116.jpg. Thanks. --Doradus 18:24, August 5, 2005 (UTC)

Unsourced quote removal

Hello Cmc0,

Regarding your removal of a Paul Martin quote, citing the reason as it being unsourced; are there two metrics at use in determining which unsourced quotes will be removed, and which will not? I cannot help but notice that an existing, unsourced quote escaped your editorial scrutiny. Please feel free to advise me on any relevant policies, and procedures regarding selective, unsourced information removal.

I thank you for your time.

Best regards,

Ray --Daystrom 22:52, 27 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Moving pages

Always move pages by using the special move button in the top of the page. Don't cut and paste text to a new page. When you do such (like you did for FCC), the page editing history is left, and easily lost in the previous location. Such is unfortunate because then people get inaccurate information on who has written a page. Attribution is required by GNU Free Documentation License. If you can't move a page, then contact an administrator. Now I had to contact an admin to correct your mistake, which I had discoverd by a sheer luck. -Hapsiainen 16:40, 10 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging Image:Orleans ray nagin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Orleans ray nagin.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{gfdl}} to release it under the GFDL. If you can claim fair use use {{fairuse}}. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by going to "Your contributions" from your user page and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thanks so much. --Shanel 19:11, 27 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:CoachK.jpg

You uploaded Image:CoachK.jpg but did not cite a source or state its copyright status. If you would, please edit the image's page to reflect this information. If the information is not provided, the image may be deleted seven days from now. Thank you. --Durin 14:55, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Isharon.jpg

Instead of reverting, I will try and explain what is going on. The reason why I replaced this photo with Image:Ariel Sharon.jpg is that the latter image is from the United States Government, which puts their work into the public domain upon creation, if it was made during official work. From what I was told, fair use images should be limited as much as possible, so that was why I replaced Image:Isharon.jpg with the image from the US Government. While it is good that Image:Isharon.jpg is sourced and it's fair use claim is cited, but an image in the public domain, IMHO, should be used instead of a fair use image. Regards, Zach (Sound Off) 05:07, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. While I did not get my reply from the Kenesant, I found a photo at http://www.mfa.gov.il/MFA/MFAArchive/2000_2009/2003/2/Ariel+Sharon.htm. Do you wish to use this? Personally, I will like to rename this image to Image:Ariel Sharon.jpg, but I want to wait to see what you think. Zach (Sound Off) 05:40, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing, will it be ok to delete Image:Isharon.jpg? Zach (Sound Off) 05:51, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The photo you uploaded at Image:Ariel Sharon.jpg is the same photo that is above this post. There is a copy at the Commons already for some reason, so the image is still present. Also, the photo you uploaded has a poor quality, so that was why I reverted. Zach ^{(Smack Back) Fair use policy} 23:43, 4 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Person

Your change to the image size has been undone a couple times now. Please make use of the talk page and describe why you feel the change is necessary. Otherwise, leave it be. -- Netoholic @ 03:55, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned once. Further un-discussed changes will not go over well. If a specific image in an article looks bad, contact me and I will find an alternative. -- Netoholic @ 03:36, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:SenatorJonCorzine.jpg

Hello, May you please update the copyright tag for the image: Image:SenatorJonCorzine.jpg. --ZeWrestler ^Talk 00:53, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian federal election, 2006

I have started a poll on using full party names or short forms on this template. PLease vote at Talk:Canadian federal election, 2006. Thanks. Ground Zero | t 23:38, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

John-Boehner.png

Thanks for the John-Boehner.png image. Just wanted to know where you got it from. ~ Cheers —This user has left wikipedia 23:45 2006-02-02

Image Tagging Image:Coachkbobknight.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Coachkbobknight.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Une4153.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Une4153.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Dethomas 02:46, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NB legislature standings

I am going to assume that you changed the Liberals up to 27 because the CP story today erroneously reports that the standings are 27-27. Here is another news article with the correct information. The Liberals won 26 seats in the last election, picked one up in a Nov. by-election but then lost one when one of their members sat as an indpendent in January. - Jord 20:29, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Balken.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Balken.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Thank you. Soothing R 20:25, 19 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:20050708-173.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20050708-173.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Martin_Ahern.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Martin_Ahern.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 00:35, 27 February 2006 (UTC)

Image:London bombers.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:London bombers.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Mark83 20:52, 28 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Str_Mar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Str_Mar.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 19:26, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:GSchroeder.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:GSchroeder.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 15:35, 15 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:Hu Jintao, Nov 13, 2004.jpg.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Hu Jintao, Nov 13, 2004.jpg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 21:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Mayor Street.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Mayor Street.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Philadelphia photo

In case you haven't seen the discussion at Talk:Philadelphia, Pennsylvania#Need Good Top Image! lately, you might want to come join in. We'd love to have more opinions. -- JVinocur 19:59, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Kaine Image

Please stop reverting that image to the different image which is also of lower resolution. If you want it to be in the article, upload it as a different file. --tomf688 (talk - email) 14:03, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I just noticed the image you keep reverting to is located here: Image:Kaine-StatePortrait.jpg. I also noticed you participated in the discussion and that you are aware that photo exists. I encourage you to stop reverting that image as I have no choice but to interpret your actions as bad faith edits. Thanks. --tomf688 (talk - email) 14:09, 8 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:Sony Playstation 3.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:Sony Playstation 3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Henry ^Flower 22:27, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image Tagging for Image:John-Boehner.PNG

Thanks for uploading Image:John-Boehner.PNG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:01, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Weah-01.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Weah-01.JPG. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 20:27, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:HarpeS.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:HarpeS.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

--Sherool (talk) 15:24, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Corzineswornin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Corzineswornin.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:20, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Fullchamber.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Fullchamber.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:14, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Rklein.jpg. However, you claim it has been licensed under the GFDL. This is not the case. As you have already pointed out, it is crown copyright. This image is now marked for deletion as the license is incorrect. --Yamla 15:22, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Angela Merkel.jpg

Please do not revert to the version with the peach suit and the "busy" background :-). See the pic's discussion page for the reason. Thank you -- Boereck 19:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Paulmartin.jpg

Please do not replace a free image with a fair use image. What is really bad, is you uploaded over top the old image, hiding the free image. This is quite a serious offense. Do not do it again. --Rob 06:48, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Str Mar.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Str Mar.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be an argument why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Jkelly 20:12, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

United States Senate elections, 2006

Hello -- I'm glad to see you actively participating in United States Senate elections, 2006. However, I've noticed that you have been assigning RED and BLUE colors to some "tossup" races instead of the neutral "purple". On the talk page for that article, there is some discussion about how to color the chart -- it would be great if you could join that discussion so we can reach consensus on the color scheme to use. In the meantime, I will return the TOSSUP seats to purple, for consistency. Thesmothete 22:02, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Jp2mozzeta.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jp2mozzeta.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Megapixie 02:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Political offices

Politicans retain their seats until the end of their terms. In the case of U.S. representatives and senators, the nex session of Congress begins on January 3 2007. Incumbents retains their seats until then. Please don't change succession boxes until then. Thanks, -Will Beback 05:00, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Rodblagojevich.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rodblagojevich.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Senator Lieberman on the Connecticut Page

I noticed you changed Sen. Lieberman to be a democrat on the Connecticut page. We currently have a discussion about that topic on the Talk:Connecticut page. As of yet, there is no consensus. The news media is currently referring to him as an Independent. I am going to revert your change on the Connecticut page until such time as we have a consensus on the Talk page. Please join the conversation there. mikemillerdc 16:36, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Blair EUPres 010705 Logo,0.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Blair EUPres 010705 Logo,0.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WJBscribe 20:04, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ed Rendell.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Ed Rendell.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 22:47, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Scr-freudenthalpic.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Scr-freudenthalpic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Chowbok ☠ 23:23, 2 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

KS Gov

Hello, I was looking at your page on Kansas Gov. Sebelius. It is currently being tagged for deletion. Since you clearly went through the effort of contacting the governor's office or another agency for this image, it would be a shame if that happened. The tag that you placed on this image is incorrect. Change it, and everything will be good, ok? Basically, you've just gotta declare whether the gov't released this image into the public domain for you or whether it is a copyrighted image that allowed you to use as long as your sources were sighted. Please fix it, so the photo stays online. VitaleBaby 04:38, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jennifer Granholm.jpg

This is not a work of the federal government and is not public domain. Please see the discussions at Talk:Jennifer Granholm#Fair use photo and Image talk:Jennifer Granholm.jpg. older ≠ wiser 03:14, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jennifer Granholm.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Jennifer Granholm.jpg. However, Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chowbok ☠ 03:56, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:20050804-116.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:20050804-116.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. When you use a generic fair use tag such as {{fair use}} or {{fair use in|article name}}, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU≈talk 21:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:20050804-116.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:20050804-116.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. — MECU≈talk 19:31, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Barak Ehud.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Barak Ehud.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WJBscribe ^{(WJB talk)} 02:37, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:GSchroeder.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:GSchroeder.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WJBscribe ^{(WJB talk)} 03:10, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BeebeOfficialPicSmall.jpg

I noticed you uploaded the image Image:BeebeOfficialPicSmall.jpg with a fair use rationale. I've tagged this image as replaceable fair use since it violates WP's first fair use criterion. --tomf688 (talk - email) 02:13, 17 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Peretz amir.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Peretz amir.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 08:27, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Philadelphia mayoral election, 2007

Please do not remove the SD tag on this article. It is considered vandalism. Please add {{hangon}} if you want to contest a deletion. Any further removal of the tag might result in a block. --[|.K.Z|][|.Z.K|] 08:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Kaine photo

Photos from virginia.gov are not public domain, nor most photos released by U.S. states. Please do not tag them as PD-USGov, since that is simply not the case. In case you have any doubt, I emailed the Virginia government a while ago regarding this issue for my own curiosity and received this response:

"...all photos of the governor which appear on his site are
copyrighted by the Commonwealth of Virginia -- and therefore the state's
copyright policy does apply:  'Any digital alteration, manipulation, or
dissemination of these photos is strictly prohibited. Unauthorized
reproduction, distribution, or exhibition for commercial or political
purposes may violate federal laws.' In other words, commercial and
non-educational uses are not kosher."

So please avoid using State Government photos. Thanks. --tomf688 (talk - email) 01:38, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chet culver-med.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Chet culver-med.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. tomf688 (talk - email) 23:44, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

Please do not upload photographs that are copyrighted by others and claim that they are re-usable under the GFDL, as you did with Image:OMalleySpeech.jpg. Such actions are considered vandalism. The next time you upload a photograph with said inaccuracies, you risk being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Consider using public domain image sources rather than risking legal action against Wikipedia by uploading copyright violations. --Tom (talk - email) 15:32, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:AlGoreWin.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:AlGoreWin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:30, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:CaseySwornIn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CaseySwornIn.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu badali ^(talk) 23:07, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Codey2007.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Codey2007.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tom (talk - email) 18:57, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:John Street.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:John Street.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Tom (talk - email) 21:41, 16 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Kufuor2004.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kufuor2004.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:54, 17 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:President.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:President.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:34, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning regarding removal of deletion templates

Per your actions on images Image:CONRAD GREGG.jpg and Image:CONRAD BUDGET.jpg, do not remove {{nsd}} or other templates of similar nature, such as {{nld}} or {{nrd}}, without providing what they are requesting. Doing so is considered counterproductive and warrants a block, so this is your final warning. Please help make Wikipedia a reliable source of information. Thanks. --Tom (talk - email) 01:16, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Martin Ahern.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Martin Ahern.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 12:07, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:AlGoreWin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AlGoreWin.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ilse @ 10:21, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have added a FU rationale to the image. Just thought you might want to know. Also, I notice that a few image notices are on this page, so I thought you might want to check WP:FURG. Happy editing. R. Baley 20:04, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Enda Kenny 1.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Enda Kenny 1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ilse @ 16:30, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Martin Ahern.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Martin Ahern.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ilse @ 10:23, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:John Street.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:John Street.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

Unless there is evidence from Temple University that this image may be used by anyone, for any reason, at any time and without permission, this is a non-free image. Tom (talk - email) 21:05, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Wards color.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Wards color.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Tom (talk - email) 21:09, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JohnTurner.jpg

I have tagged Image:JohnTurner.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. DieInquisitor 21:08, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Marionbarry.jpg

I have tagged Image:Marionbarry.jpg as {{replaceable fair use}}. If you wish to dispute this assertion, please add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}} to the image description page and a comment explaining your reasoning to the the image talk page. Calliopejen1 23:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:SprintLogo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:SprintLogo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:15, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:SANDERSWIN.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:SANDERSWIN.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:02, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Chirac_EU.jpg

I have tagged Image:Chirac_EU.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Wikipedia:Use rationale examples. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 19:21, 4 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:20050708-173.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20050708-173.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Blair logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Blair logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:56, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Lamontlieberman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Lamontlieberman.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 22:16, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:20060206 cab01.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:20060206 cab01.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:57, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Williams pavelic blue 000.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Williams pavelic blue 000.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 07:45, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Blair logo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Blair logo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ViperSnake151 16:02, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Used one of your images

Hello, I am the webmaster of a few mobile computing-related web logs and wanted to tell you that I used one of your images: http://tamspalm.tamoggemon.com/2008/12/14/handango-takes-mobile-apps-into-best-buy-stores/ http://tamsppc.tamoggemon.com/2008/12/14/handango-takes-mobile-apps-into-best-buy-stores/ http://tamswms.tamoggemon.com/2008/12/14/handango-takes-mobile-apps-into-best-buy-stores/

In case you have any issues, please let me know at Tamog AT gmx DOT at!

Best regards & Thank You! Tam Hanna —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.178.74.20 (talk) 15:16, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:AlGoreWin.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:AlGoreWin.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 21:44, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Kufuor2004.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Kufuor2004.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 22:10, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:President.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:President.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Mosmof (talk) 22:11, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ministers of the Ghanaian Government listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Ministers of the Ghanaian Government. Since you had some involvement with the Ministers of the Ghanaian Government redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 04:07, 23 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Total-petrol-station.jpg

The file File:Total-petrol-station.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"President of canada" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect President of canada has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 March 20 § President of canada until a consensus is reached. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 19:00, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]