User talk:Canysp

Speedy deletion of Driton Krasniqi

A tag has been placed on Driton Krasniqi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fatal!ty ^(T☠LK) 16:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Flag icons

Please stop adding flag icons to sportspeople's infoboxes. See WP:MOSICON#Use of flags for sportspeople. --Jaellee (talk) 16:55, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bruno Okshluni

A tag has been placed on Bruno Okshluni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 15:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bledar Dura

A tag has been placed on Bledar Dura requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 15:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Illirjan Mertiri

A tag has been placed on Illirjan Mertiri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 15:26, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Erand Hoxha

A tag has been placed on Erand Hoxha requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 15:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Bazjon Trogas

A tag has been placed on Bazjon Trogas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 15:27, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Driton Krasniqi

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Driton Krasniqi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Waterden (talk) 15:28, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Ilirjan Mertiraj

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ilirjan Mertiraj, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ilirjan Mertiraj seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ilirjan Mertiraj, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:40, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Contributions

Thanks for your contributions but could you expand the articles a little to avoid speedy deletion tags being placed on them thanks and happy editing.BigDunc^Talk 17:26, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with BigDunc. Please add context to your articles. At least 20 of your articles had been tagged as {{db-nocontent}}. I've rescued them but in the future, an admin might accidentally delete these no-content articles without knowing that information can be easily added. Examples of how you can add information to your articles are at Tamás Lapsánszki and Viktor Valentényi. Also consider added sources to your articles as well. This ensures that the article will be verifiable. Thanks, Cunard (talk) 01:51, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attila Polonkai

A tag has been placed on Attila Polonkai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Marsa Lahminal (talk) 18:11, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Attila Forrai

A tag has been placed on Attila Forrai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Marsa Lahminal (talk) 18:13, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Catalin Anghel

A tag has been placed on Catalin Anghel requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fullstop (talk) 18:30, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gábor Szilágyi

A tag has been placed on Gábor Szilágyi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fullstop (talk) 19:40, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of István Sándor

A tag has been placed on István Sándor requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Fullstop (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox stubs

Hi there: you have added a lot of articles which consist of infoboxes about footballers, with no other content. A number has already been tagged for deletion, and I suspect that they will be deleted unless at least some context is added. Would you care to attend to it? --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 20:46, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Footballer articles

Hello. I noticed that you have created many new articles about Hungarian footballers. I appreciate your efforts to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Hungarian football, but would like to give you some advice. If you create a new article about a footballer, please make sure he has played in a fully professional league (I am sure that the NBII does not meet this standard, and NBI probably doesn't either) or for the senior national football team. Also, please add references (using websites such as www.national-football-teams.com or www.hlsz.hu) which show that the player has met these criteria. You may want to look at the changes I made to Ferenc Szilveszter for an example. Please let me know if you have any questions. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 16:36, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DEFAULTSORT and accented characters

Because of English language tradition and weakness of the Wikipedia software, we have this important guideline:

Punctuation, such as apostrophes and colons (but not hyphens) should be removed, and accented letters and ligatures should be replaced by their unaccented or separated counterparts.

See: Wikipedia:Categorization of people#Ordering names in a category Studerby (talk) 19:11, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Template:Football box start/doc. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 11:41, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your changed Krisztián Kenesei's infobox, but the year is wrong. Matthew_hk t c 17:38, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Péter Szeverényi

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Péter Szeverényi, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:N and WP:ATHLETE as it is about a non-notable footballer who has not yet played in a fully-pro league

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jogurney (talk) 17:58, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sándor Szabó

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Sándor Szabó, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Article fails WP:N and WP:ATHLETE as it covers a non-notable footballer who has not yet played in a fully-pro league

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jogurney (talk) 18:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian players born/played in Yugoslavia/Serbia.

Hi Canysp. I see you know much about Hungarian leagues. I wanted to ask you something. Since I´m interested in finding Hungarian players that have played in Serbia or Yugoslavia, I´m having much trouble going through Serbian websites becouse they rarely say the nationality of the players and if it is Hungarian, they automatically, sometimes wrongly, assume that is a Vojvodina Hungarian, so anyway, they allways treat Hungarian players as national. I made two lists: List of foreign football players in Serbia covers top leagues, and List of foreign players in Serbian lower leagues. I am following one criterium that preatty much follows the next logic: Serbians who were born in surronding countries and didn´t played for other countries selections, and if played as Serbs in other countries are not foreign in Serbia, so ; Hungarians that were born in Serbia, and played as Hungarians in other countries I consider Hungarians. Can you help me find more? Or advice me some websites? Cheers FkpCascais (talk) 01:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanx. I´ll search throu those websites. Feel free to add players to my list. I find out that you made the Attila Andruskó page, that´s how I finded you. Whatever and whenever you need help, ask me. We will keep in touch. FkpCascais (talk) 22:08, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I improved the Attila Andruskó text. Chek it out. Some words were wrongly written, but I understand what you wanted to say. If you don´t like it you can allways revert it (put it back as you write it) or edit it again. I see that many articles that you wrote were deleted, so I put the text in a more "Wiki" way. FkpCascais (talk) 22:41, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well keep in touch. I´m on hollyday until 1 August, so I may not be here (in Wikipedia) every day until then. The best websites that I know are listed as external sources in my List. Have fun. (FkpCascais)

Category:Akja FC footballers

I see that you created this category and later blanked the page. A faster way to delete a category you've created yourself is to place {{db-author}} on the page. This tag attracts the attention of an administrator who can perform the deletion for you. Contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 21:59, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ottó Handler

The article Ottó Handler has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about athlete who has not played in a fully-pro league and fails WP:N.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 14:17, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ottó Handler

Hello and thank you for your message. The reason why I proposed this article for deletion is because it is about a young football player who has not had any significant achievment. He is not notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. However, if you believe the article should be kept, please delete the lines I added at the top of the article. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 12:33, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Hungarian National Championship I 2009–2010 (Detailed)

I have nominated Hungarian National Championship I 2009–2010 (Detailed), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hungarian National Championship I 2009–2010 (Detailed). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 11:41, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I can't do anything but propose it for deletion (which is the standard procedure, by the way), but it seems as if the article will be gone soon anyways. If you want to set up a new article, please do so by creating a sandbox in your own userspace and putting any content in there first. It is less likely to have an article deleted this way, plus you can ask more experienced contributors from Wikipedia:WikiProject Football for help. As for your DVSC season article, not bad for a first try. Take a look on similar articles like Arsenal F.C. season 2009–10 if you want to fine-tune it. Regards, Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 10:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I need your help

Hi, I hope you are having a nice summer. I´m making players pages, and I made some Hungarians too: János Borsó, József Dzurják, Zoltan Sabo ( he was born in Serbia so that is wy his name is officially Zoltan Sabo, and not Zoltán Szabó), Ištvan Dudaš (Serb/Hungarian) and Mátyás Sándor. I need help from someone who knows all about Hungarian football like you: I can´t find more about M.Sándor that the information that I have in his page, that he played in Spartak Subotica (1990-1995) and Békéscsaba 1995-1997, but I beleve he played more that only until 1997, because he was only 24 years old then, but I can´t find more clubs, can you help me?

I also want to make the pages of: Attila Szabados ,he played in Spartak Subotica 1989-1991 or more, and in Paksi until 2006. Do you know more years and clubs where he played? ; Sándor Szabó that played in NK Maribor 1976-77, Spartak Subotica 1980-81 and AIK Bačka Topola 1985-86, Rudolf Rafai played in Spartak Subotica 1988-91 or more, and Pál Dárdai that played in Vojvodina in 1985-86, and is not the Hertha player. Tell me if you know something about this players. Have fun! Regards. FkpCascais (talk) 00:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Georges Ekounda

The article Georges Ekounda has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Did not play a single game in a fully-professional league and therefore fails WP:ATHLETE

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Geregen2 (talk) 20:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Canysp! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 43 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 716 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Illirjan Mertiri - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Amarildo Belisha - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Róbert Fekete - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Ademar Braga (Brazilian footballer) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Gábor Brlázs - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
József Bujáki - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Zsolt Fehér - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Krisztián Gabala - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Szabolcs Udvari - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Viktor Valentényi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

More...

11. László Cseke 12. Norbert Kovács 13. Tamás Lapsánszki 14. László Megyesi 15. Richárd Hoffmann 16. András Keresztúri 17. János Koszta 18. Gábor Nagy (footballer born 1971) 19. Ferenc Rott 20. Csaba Gelbmann 21. János Kertész 22. Csaba László (footballer born 1967) 23. Tibor Pomper 24. Myroslav Resko 25. Csaba Szakos 26. Ferenc Szaszovszky 27. Djordje Bajic 28. Balázs Bérczy 29. Viktor Brovchenko 30. Krisztián Csillag 31. Catalin Anghel 32. Zsolt Aubel 33. Szabolcs Szegletes 34. Gábor Szilágyi 35. József Tajti 36. Gergő Gohér 37. Zoltán Czirjék 38. Krisztián Füzi 39. Zoltán Molnár 40. Daniel Usvat 41. Zsolt Füzesi 42. István Kiss (footballer born 1970) 43. Károly Potemkin

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Gábor Horváth (footballer born 1983)

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Gábor Horváth (footballer born 1983). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Gábor Horváth (footballer). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Gábor Horváth (footballer) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 11:21, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zoltán Czirjék

The article Zoltán Czirjék has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 15:31, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. If you have sources which show he has played in a fully-pro competition, please add them and I will be happy to remove the proposed deletion tag. Best regards. Jogurney (talk) 15:41, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Attila Gyagya

A tag has been placed on Attila Gyagya requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. C6541 (T↔C) 16:37, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Vladan Čukić

A tag has been placed on Vladan Čukić requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. C6541 (T↔C) 16:52, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gary Tavars

The article Gary Tavars has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:ATHLETE; no caps

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ironholds (talk) 03:55, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Dávid Kelemen

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Dávid Kelemen. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dávid Kelemen. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:12, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BOX vs storyline

Hi there CANYSP, VASCO from Portugal here,

As you did (again) in Pablo Coira, please leave boxes compressed, full name of club in storyline and intro. Please respect other people's work, so the same can be done to you. Take care - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 03:25, 4 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Illirjan Mertiri

The article Illirjan Mertiri has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:Sports notability criteria.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Echetus Xe 01:12, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ádám Csutak

The article Ádám Csutak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about footballer who hasn't played in a fully-pro league and which fails the general notability guideline.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jogurney (talk) 21:38, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ákos Szentgyörgyi

The article Ákos Szentgyörgyi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league. His cup appearance does not grant notability as it was not against a fully pro team.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:15, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Krisztián Gabala for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Krisztián Gabala is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Krisztián Gabala until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 01:55, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of János Kertész (soccer)

The article János Kertész (soccer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unable to find any reliable secondary sources (or in fact anything but wikimirrors) that says this football player exists.. There is a mathematician of the same name that brings up lots of Gbook results, but nothing relevant to football. No entry at Soccerway. Of course, additional sources welcome.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. joe decker ^{talk to me} 12:30, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of János Kertész (soccer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article János Kertész (soccer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/János Kertész (soccer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J04n(talk page) 12:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amarildo Belisha

The article Amarildo Belisha has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:02, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Csaba László (footballer born 1967)

The article Csaba László (footballer born 1967) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence able to be found at http://www.hlsz.hu that this person ever played. Note that there is an older person of the same name who is a football coach, which makes google searching almost impossible.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 08:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gábor Nagy (footballer born 1971)

The article Gábor Nagy (footballer born 1971) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence on http://www.hlsz.hu that he ever played at the top level in Hungary. No other evidence of significant coverage to prove notability able to be found. Seems to be a younger player of the same name who makes google searching difficult.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The-Pope (talk) 10:26, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Zoltán Csák

The article Zoltán Csák has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gábor Pozsár

The article Gábor Pozsár has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:19, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

János Ferenczi

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: János Ferenczi. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Francisco Gallardo - Categories

Hi there CANYSP, VASCO from Portugal here,

please leave the categories in the order in which they are now OK. The order is: 1 - personal categories; 2 - player position; 3 - clubs and division in his country; 4 - the other clubs abroad the player represented, if any; 4 - international categories (under-21, full national team, World Cup or UEFA Euro appearances); 5 - and finally, the expatriate categories. If a player becomes a manager, then we have the manager categories.

Please leave it be, happy editing - --Vasco Amaral (talk) 00:22, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You too man! :) --Vasco Amaral (talk) 13:27, 27 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Tamás German, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Giant Snowman 22:49, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bertold Popovics

The article Bertold Popovics has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nathan2055 ^talk^-^review 16:50, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Marco Caneira - categories

A couple of months ago, i explain you about the correct order of categories, you say "OK", then go and do the OPPOSITE? Ok, really don't understand why, "thank you". --Vasco Amaral (talk) 01:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gábor Pozsár

The article Gábor Pozsár has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:22, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited List of Hungarian football transfers winter 2011–12, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 24 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Debreceni VSC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Klein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thank you for your attention! Next time pay attention more!--Canysp (talk) 17:16, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Tamás Horváth (footballer born 1991)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Tamás Horváth (footballer born 1991). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Tamás Horváth (football). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Tamás Horváth (football) - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Scopecreep (talk) 10:27, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thank you for your help! The problem is that I did not notice. But there in the future I will pay attention to such things. Again, thank you! Best regards,Canysp (talk) 10:31, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Bara Mamadou Ndiaye

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Bara Mamadou Ndiaye requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Biglulu (talk) 05:30, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

Thank you for your recent contributions. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, with less risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Biglulu (talk) 05:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiThanks

Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.0.137 (talk) 13:54, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is very welcome! I try to use my skills to the best!Canysp (talk) 14:22, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2011–12 Pécsi Mecsek FC season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Baja

Tomáš Sedlák (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hungarian

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. When you recently edited 2011–12 Újpest FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baja (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Meghivas

Szia!

Mint a magyar foci egyik fo karbantartojat az angol wikin, szeretnelek meghivni a magyar wikiprojekt sport es jatekok (Sports and games) munkacsoportjaba. Irtam egy rovid vazlatot arrol, hogy hogyan lehetne egy kis eletet lehelni az amugy haldoklo wikiprojektbe, es ezek kozott az egyik pont az, hogy letre lehetne hozni munkacsoportokat, hogy osszefogja az azonos erdeklodesu wikipedistakat es egyutt hatekonyabban dolgozhassanak. Az iras itt talalhato. Orommel vennem, ha reszt vennel a sport es jatekok munkacsoportban (legalabb 5 tag kellene a megalapitashoz), es egyutt kipofoznank a sport, a te esetedben gondolom leginkabb a foci vonatkozasu cikkeket. Ha valami kerdesed lenne, azt tedd fel az iras vitalapjan, vagy kerdezz engem nyugodtan. akar itt (figyelolistara tettelek) akar az en vitalapomon.

Udv es tovabbi jo szerkesztest,

Thehoboclown (talk) 11:55, 5 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Szia!

Azt hiszem, felreertettuk egymast. En ugy gondoltam, hogy az angol wikin a WikiProject Hungary-n belul hoznank letre egy muhely felet. :) Ebben szeretnem, ha reszt vennel, karbantartanad a focis cikkeket, vagy ami erdekel. Irtam egy vazlatot, ahova tobben mar fel is iratkoztak, es veled egyutt meg is lennenk mar oten, ami egy jo alap a muhely elinditasahoz. Ha erdekel es reszt vennel benne, ird fel Te is a neved, es onnan mar lehet inditani a kozos munkat – megbeszelni az alapelveket, meghatarozni a rovid es hosszutavu celokat, ragyurni egy-ket kiemlet cikkre, stb. Ha lenne valami kerdesed, irj batran!

Szep napot, Thehoboclown (talk) 12:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Szia!

Igen, arra gondoltam, hogy mindenki karbantartja a sajat erdeklodesenek megfelelo cikkeket, fellep az esetleges vandalok ellen, es mind mennyisegileg mind minosegileg boviti a sajat teruletet. A mentoralas is egy nagyon jo otlet, meg az, hogy valahogy megprobaljunk bevonni tobb es tobb szerkesztot, hogy nagyobb, tobb es jobb munkat lehessen vegezni. Az az igazsag, hogy szetkuldtem jo par meghivast azoknak, akik vmilyen magyar sportos cikket szerkesztettek, de nagyon csekely a visszajelzes. Koztuk van 2-3 focis szerkeszto is, de rajtad kivul semmilyen valaszt, se pozitivat se negativat nem kaptam... Es igen, valoban nagyon keves es igen gyenge sport temaju cikk van mas temakhoz kepest (mondjuk nem csak magyar vonatkozasban), ugyhogy lenne min dolgozni. A masik, hogy hosszu tavon letre kellene hozni egy "Sport in Hungary" cikket, egy altalanos attekintest, stb., amibe mindenki a szamara jol ismert sporto(ka)t kibontja, leirja a rovid tortenetet, bajnoksagokat, kulcsesemenyeket, figurakat stb. Utolagos engedelmeddel felirtam a nevedet a resztvevok koze, es elinditom hivatalosan is a bejegyzesi folyamatot. Nem tudom, hogy meddig tart, nekem is ez az elso ilyen, de remelem hamar megmegy. Meg majd jelentkezem! – Thehoboclown (talk) 09:52, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gergely Bobál

The article Gergely Bobál has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Has not played for the Senior team. Fails WP:NFOOTY

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 02:14, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have deprodded this article as the player have played in one senior game for Budapest Honvéd FC. -- KTC (talk) 02:41, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zolán Puskás

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zolán Puskás requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 20:40, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I accidentally screwed up!--Canysp (talk) 20:43, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miklós Balogh

The article Miklós Balogh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 05:00, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! If you look closely he played first-class championship, but I develop the site further. Thank you!--Canysp (talk) 08:40, 4 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Debreceni VSC II

The article Debreceni VSC II has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent notability, "B" team of a club which has its own article.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cloudz 679 20:25, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2012–13 Lombard-Pápa TFC season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Martin Klein

List of Hungarian football transfers summer 2012 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Red Bull Salzburg

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 03:35, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Kecskeméti TE season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roland Varga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ádám Szalai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estadi Comunal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 13 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gergő_Oláh

Please do not create biographies of living people without adding an inline citation. Gigs (talk) 15:28, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Botond Király

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Botond Király. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:11, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Máté Szolga

Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Máté Szolga. The community has decided that all new biographies of living persons must contain a reliable source that supports at least one statement made about the person in the article as per our verifiability policy. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:14, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Máté Szolga

The article Máté Szolga has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- Patchy1 REF THIS BLP 07:54, 8 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tino Lagator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Split (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:16, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry! Thanks! --Canysp (talk) 23:43, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2012–13 Győri ETO FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roland Varga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:22, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jucie Lupeta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Portuguese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mihailo Radulović

The article Mihailo Radulović has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:48, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tamás Horváth (footballer born 1983)

The article Tamás Horváth (footballer born 1983) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:38, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jonstein Magnussen

The article Jonstein Magnussen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:23, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Árni Grunnveit Olsen

The article Árni Grunnveit Olsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:23, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gert Åge Hansen

The article Gert Åge Hansen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:24, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Poul Grunnveit Olsen

The article Poul Grunnveit Olsen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:24, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gunnar Zachariasen

The article Gunnar Zachariasen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:25, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Norayr Abrahamyan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Norayr Abrahamyan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Didier Boris Kadio

The article Didier Boris Kadio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tigran Davtyan

The article Tigran Davtyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:28, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aram Muradyan

The article Aram Muradyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:28, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Davit Hakobyan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Davit Hakobyan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Davit Hakobyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:29, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Marikyan

The article David Marikyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Gevorg Hovhannisyan

The article Gevorg Hovhannisyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Artyom Mikaelyan

The article Artyom Mikaelyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aghvan Davoyan

The article Aghvan Davoyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:31, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aram Tosunyan

The article Aram Tosunyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:31, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Edvard Panosyan

The article Edvard Panosyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:31, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian help needed

Hello Canysp, I'm contacting you because we need some Hungarian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on hu.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Hungarian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 01:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dame Diop

The article Dame Diop has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Márk Tamás

The article Márk Tamás has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mat ty.007 12:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry! corrected article!Canysp (talk) 12:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Paksi SE season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tata (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Senad Husić

Hi, I'm Jackson Peebles. Canysp, thanks for creating Senad Husić!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. If you could please kindly add some sources, I'd greatly appreciate it; otherwise, the article looks great! You might also benefit from adding a picture to the infobox! Thanks for your hard work!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Jackson Peebles (talk) 03:52, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

2013–14 Mezőkövesd SE season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Tata

2013–14 Pécsi Mecsek FC season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Josip Barišić

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miguel Ángel Luque

The article Miguel Ángel Luque has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable footballer, has not played at senior level, fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jezhotwells (talk) 07:28, 6 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simon Ligot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Namur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thiago Ribeiro da Silva

The article Thiago Ribeiro da Silva has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Edgars2007 ^{(talk/contribs)} 14:35, 27 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Hungarian football transfers summer 2013 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{col-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:57, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A little help

Hi Canysp. I'm trying to expand "Siege of Esztergom" article in Turkish Wikipedia. I have many Turkish sources, but they only mention about Turkish side. I found this source, it gives some information about the Austrian/Hungarian side, but I do not know Hungarian :( I need you to translate between 303rd and 306th pages. I would be very happy if you do that. Have a nice day.--Rapsar (talk) 21:11, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Pécsi Mecsek FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gábor Horváth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orbán Gáspár

Helló! Nem nagyon értek a magyar focihoz, ezért írok neked. Március 8-án a miniszterelnök fia bemutatkozott az NB1-ben, esetleg létrehoznád a róla szóló cikket? :) Nem tudom, hogy a WP nevezetességét megüti-e, szerintem igen. --Norden1990 (talk) 19:09, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Hungarian football transfers winter 2013–14 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Fs player|no=20|nat=TGO|pos=MF|name=[[Henri Eninful]]|other= loan to [[Kecskeméti TE|Kecskemét]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:57, 14 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emmanuel Mensah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gahan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (András Pintér) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating András Pintér, Canysp!

Wikipedia editor OccultZone just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

External links are not references, you should specifically add references, especially when it is a BLP article.

To reply, leave a comment on OccultZone's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Endre Botka

Hello, Canysp. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Endre Botka, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Endre Botka to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, OccultZone (Talk) 15:59, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Tamás Kádár. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Violation of WP:MOSFLAG. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:21, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Elhadji Badiane Sidibe may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{Infobox football biography

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:37, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Thomas Weber (footballer) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:06, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Date template

Please do not use the date template as you did in Lansana Sagna. Instruction on the {{date}} page state, "This template should only be used internally in other templates". This template only causes problems, such as broken brackets that happened on Lansana Sagna. Bgwhite (talk) 06:30, 3 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Footballer infoboxes

Why are you repeatedly introducing non-standard formatting to footballer infoboxes, latest example here. There is a standard at {{Infobox football biography}} for a reason... Giant Snowman 09:03, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! They are edited so because when I edit a page on a regular basis, it makes it much clearer to me ... Best regards!--Canysp (talk) 09:09, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not 'convert' the infoboxes into your own preferred format, we need to use the standard format across all articles. Giant Snowman 09:38, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok!--Canysp (talk) 09:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2014–15 Dunaújváros PASE season

Hi, I'm TheMagikCow. Canysp, thanks for creating 2014–15 Dunaújváros PASE season!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please can you give some more references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. TheMagikCow (talk) 12:36, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since most of its content is user-generated, transfermarkt is not a reliable source per WP:SPS. Please do not cite it in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:35, 2 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bruno Pascua

added a link pointing to Santander

Stjepan Kukuruzović

added a link pointing to Lerchenfeld

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Hungarian football transfers summer 2014 may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Fs player|no= |nat=HUN|pos=GK|name=Donát Helesfay|other=loan from [[Kozármisleny SE|Kozármisleny]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:06, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Christian Banovits

The article Christian Banovits has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article has no references

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AlanS (talk) 09:57, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Bálint Böröczky

The article Bálint Böröczky has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AlanS (talk) 13:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (2014–15 Újpest FC season) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating 2014–15 Újpest FC season, Canysp!

Wikipedia editor Romtam just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Good article!

To reply, leave a comment on Romtam's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Category:People from Ivyland, Pennsylvania

Category:People from Ivyland, Pennsylvania, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William 12:09, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Sergio Tamayo, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Giant Snowman 16:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

transfermarkt

I've asked you this before, but you seem to have ignored it so I'll ask you again: Please stop citing tranfermarkt in articles. Most of it's content is user-generated, so it is not a reliable sources per WP:SPS. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 17:38, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited James Manjrekar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Canada national soccer team. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Global account

Hi Canysp! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to ping me with {{ping|DerHexer}}. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 23:16, 30 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Hungarian football transfers summer 2015, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FK Bačka. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:47, 19 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to the African Destubathon

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:13, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Canysp. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt again

Since most of its content is user-generated, Transfermarkt is not a reliable source. Please don't cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:56, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Canysp. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Kevin Varga) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Kevin Varga, Canysp!

Wikipedia editor Babymissfortune just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time creating this page.

To reply, leave a comment on Babymissfortune's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

^{Babymissfortune} 06:52, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gergő Holdampf moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gergő Holdampf, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 14:23, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Matías Rodríguez (footballer, born 1993)

Hello, I've noticed you keep adding a European match statistic to the Matías Rodríguez (footballer, born 1993) article. According to Soccerway and UEFA, Rodríguez he hasn't played in continental competition for Ferencváros. R96Skinner (talk) 08:11, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Canysp. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Bryan de Jesús

Hello, Canysp,

Welcome to Wikipedia and thanks for creating Bryan de Jesús! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

It is a requirement for biographies of living people that their sources are WP:INLINECITED.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 17:26, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Filip Dragóner

Hello, Canysp,

Thanks for creating Filip Dragóner! I edit here too, under the username Boleyn and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-

Please add your references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 21:27, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yannick Ndzoumou moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Yannick Ndzoumou, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:52, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erik Németh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erik Németh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Németh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Al-Mabarrah players

A tag has been placed on Category:Al-Mabarrah players requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:23, 22 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ádám Pintér (footballer, born 2001) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ádám Pintér (footballer, born 2001), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. PATH SLOPU 12:49, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gergő Beliczky

Please do not add unsourced stats tables per WP:V, and when you do add them please ensure they match the MOS at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Players#Career statistics. Your addition has been challenged and removed, do not re-add without consensus per WP:BRD. Giant Snowman 08:17, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Richárd Nagy (footballer, born 1994) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Richárd Nagy (footballer, born 1994), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:14, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019–20 Puskás Akadémia FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ádám Varga (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:02, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Gábor Boros

Hello, Canysp,

Thank you for creating Gábor Boros.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

All biographies of living people need WP:INLINECITED references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Boleyn (talk) 19:00, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Balázs Slakta moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Balázs Slakta, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:36, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alex Szabó moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Alex Szabó, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 09:07, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Máté Szolga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Máté Szolga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Máté Szolga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. HawkAussie (talk) 23:46, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Ádám Pintér (footballer, born 2001) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Ádám Pintér (footballer, born 2001), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:22, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ádám Pintér (footballer, born 2001)

Hello, Canysp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ádám Pintér".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Squeeps10 ^{Talk to me}_{My edits} 04:02, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 7

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000–01 Ferencvárosi TC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gábor Egressy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:19, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Nemzeti Bajnokság I seasons

Template:Nemzeti Bajnokság I seasons has been nominated for merging with Template:Nemzeti Bajnokság I teamlist. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 17:46, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bence Bíró, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Campeonato de Portugal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2020–21 FC Ajka season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020–21 FC Ajka season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020–21 FC Ajka season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 10:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2014–15 FC Ajka season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014–15 FC Ajka season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 FC Ajka season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 08:03, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2014–15 BFC Siófok season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014–15 BFC Siófok season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014–15 BFC Siófok season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 08:12, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2011–12 Budapest Honvéd FC II season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2011–12 Budapest Honvéd FC II season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2011–12 Budapest Honvéd FC II season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 21:37, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2012–13 Szolnoki MÁV FC season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012–13 Szolnoki MÁV FC season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012–13 Szolnoki MÁV FC season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 21:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2013–14 FC Ajka season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013–14 FC Ajka season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 FC Ajka season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 22:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2013–14 Nyíregyháza Spartacus FC season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013–14 Nyíregyháza Spartacus FC season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2013–14 Nyíregyháza Spartacus FC season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 22:12, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2018–19 Balmazújvárosi FC season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2018–19 Balmazújvárosi FC season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2018–19 Balmazújvárosi FC season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 22:28, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Canysp

Thank you for creating Luka Lakvekheliani.

User:Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Please add inline citations to biographies of living people.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Boleyn (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2019–20 Budafoki MTE season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019–20 Budafoki MTE season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019–20 Budafoki MTE season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 13:44, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2020–21 Békéscsaba 1912 Előre season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020–21 Békéscsaba 1912 Előre season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2020–21 Békéscsaba 1912 Előre season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone 13:53, 6 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hungarian second division seasons

Hi Canysp, I've noticed that you are the creator of a lot of league season articles such as 2019–20 Budafoki MTE season and 2020–21 Békéscsaba 1912 Előre season. I appreciate the work put into these articles but, sadly, a lot of them don't seem to demonstrate WP:GNG; in particular the sources do not show WP:SIGCOV "Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. Since you are likely more familiar with Hungarian news sources, do you think there is potential for the articles to have well-sourced prose so that they then meet GNG? Kind regards Spiderone 13:26, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:39, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

1998–99 Debreceni VSC season moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 1998–99 Debreceni VSC season, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bence Bakos for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bence Bakos is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bence Bakos until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:40, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Szabolcs Csordás for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Szabolcs Csordás is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Szabolcs Csordás until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:51, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tamás Turi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamás Turi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamás Turi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:06, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of József Boda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article József Boda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/József Boda until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:53, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Olivér Fenyvesi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olivér Fenyvesi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivér Fenyvesi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:11, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Norbert Mokánszki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Norbert Mokánszki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Norbert Mokánszki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:28, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bence Varga for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bence Varga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bence Varga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:40, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ádám Hamar for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ádám Hamar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ádám Hamar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:51, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Roland Bíró for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roland Bíró is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roland Bíró until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

HawkAussie (talk) 11:10, 25 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tibor Fülöp for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tibor Fülöp is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tibor Fülöp until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:23, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zoltán Puskás for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zoltán Puskás is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zoltán Puskás until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:02, 23 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Márk Kónya for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Márk Kónya, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Márk Kónya until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:1998–99 Debreceni VSC season

Hello, Canysp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:1998–99 Debreceni VSC season, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:02, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2019–20 Vasas SC season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2019–20 Vasas SC season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2019–20 Vasas SC season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:1998–99 Debreceni VSC season

Hello, Canysp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "1998–99 Debreceni VSC season".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:53, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tamás Mester for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamás Mester is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamás Mester until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2021–22 Újpest FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lirim Kastrati.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tamás Csepregi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamás Csepregi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamás Csepregi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 15:39, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tiszakécskei FC footballers

A tag has been placed on Category:Tiszakécskei FC footballers indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nemzeti Bajnokság II seasons

Template:Nemzeti Bajnokság II seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Nemzeti Bajnokság II (east) teamlist

Template:Nemzeti Bajnokság II (east) teamlist has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:23, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of János Birtalan for deletion

A discussion is taking place to determine if the article János Birtalan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/János Birtalan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:27, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2010–11 MTK Budapest FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page László Bartha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:58, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2011–12 MTK Budapest FC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Baja.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ádám Fenyvesi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ádám Fenyvesi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ádám Fenyvesi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 13:09, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Marcell Enyingi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcell Enyingi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcell Enyingi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2004–05 Ferencvárosi TC season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page László Bartha.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sameh Sherif for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sameh Sherif is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sameh Sherif until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

𝕱𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖎𝖆 (talk) 10:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve 2005–06 Ferencvárosi TC season

Hello, Canysp,

Thank you for creating 2005–06 Ferencvárosi TC season.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Majority of the references here are match reports with subscriber commentary, blog comments. These do not pass for reliable sources, for notability.
This article needs more references to satisfy notability for sport. What is needed are references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, in multiple secondary sources which are WP:RS; that is your guide. You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. A more comprehensive guide is WP:SOURCES ... Providing sufficient references, ideally one per fact referred to, that meet these tough criteria is likely to allow this article to remain. Lack of them or an inability to find them is likely to mean that the article may not be suitable for inclusion.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 22:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dávid Bailo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dávid Bailo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dávid Bailo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:08, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Hungarian people of Malian descent

A tag has been placed on Category:Hungarian people of Malian descent indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:14, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Patrik Gránicz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Patrik Gránicz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrik Gránicz until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:09, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Botond Földi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Botond Földi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Botond Földi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:08, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

András Hársfalvi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, András Hársfalvi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:40, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ádám Mayer moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ádám Mayer, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:43, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With all the nomination messages on your talk, I think by now you must have realized that footballers are no longer automatically notable just because they've played in a top level league, right? Or no? If you're still going to create them back to back in quick succession, at least put in the effort to have them sourced with actual sources, not just databases. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:47, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dominik Kovács (footballer, born 2002) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dominik Kovács (footballer, born 2002), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Major moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Martin Major, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Imre Széles moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Imre Széles, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^Talk? 19:49, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Vince Szegi moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vince Szegi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CollectiveSolidarity (talk) 23:51, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 31

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022–23 Magyar Kupa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Abda.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Péter Csima for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Péter Csima is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Péter Csima until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tamás Varga (footballer) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamás Varga (footballer) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamás Varga (footballer) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:18, 13 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:András Hársfalvi

Hello, Canysp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:András Hársfalvi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Ádám Mayer

Hello, Canysp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ádám Mayer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dominik Kovács (footballer, born 2002)

Hello, Canysp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dominik Kovács (footballer, born 2002), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Martin Major

Hello, Canysp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Martin Major, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Imre Széles

Hello, Canysp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Imre Széles, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:02, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Vince Szegi

Hello, Canysp. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vince Szegi, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, Canysp!

Happy New Year!

Canysp,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 16:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops ^⋠T⋡ 16:56, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:2022–23 Nemzeti Bajnokság II table

Template:2022–23 Nemzeti Bajnokság II table has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:28, 5 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:András Hársfalvi

Hello, Canysp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "András Hársfalvi".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ádám Mayer

Hello, Canysp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Ádám Mayer".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:04, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Martin Major

Hello, Canysp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Martin Major".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dominik Kovács (footballer, born 2002)

Hello, Canysp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dominik Kovács".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Imre Széles

Hello, Canysp. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Imre Széles".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:06, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Károly Bogyó for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Károly Bogyó is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Károly Bogyó until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:50, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of András Burics for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article András Burics is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/András Burics until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Csaba Gelbmann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Csaba Gelbmann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Csaba Gelbmann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:04, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of János Fejes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article János Fejes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/János Fejes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:13, 15 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Márk Farkas for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Márk Farkas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Márk Farkas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:41, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:SVG Bleiburg players has been nominated for discussion

Category:SVG Bleiburg players has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Geregen2 (talk) 19:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:SV Leibnitz Flavia Solva players has been nominated for discussion

Category:SV Leibnitz Flavia Solva players has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Geregen2 (talk) 16:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:SC Obertann players has been nominated for discussion

Category:SC Obertann players has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Geregen2 (talk) 20:18, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dávid Gyenes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dávid Gyenes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dávid Gyenes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:03, 23 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tamás Csehi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamás Csehi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamás Csehi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Sgubaldo (talk) 14:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Szilárd Kovács for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Szilárd Kovács is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Szilárd Kovács until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:44, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of El Hadji Badiane Sidibé for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article El Hadji Badiane Sidibé is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/El Hadji Badiane Sidibé until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Paul Vaurie (talk) 05:26, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Zsolt Merczel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zsolt Merczel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zsolt Merczel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:24, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Electo Wilson for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Electo Wilson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electo Wilson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:34, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mátyás Lelkes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mátyás Lelkes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mátyás Lelkes until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:41, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tamás Giák for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tamás Giák is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tamás Giák until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Szabolcs Horváth for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Szabolcs Horváth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Szabolcs Horváth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Gergő Máté for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gergő Máté is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gergő Máté until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:31, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kristian Benkő for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kristian Benkő, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kristian Benkő until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Danijel Ćulum

The article Danijel Ćulum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:SPORTSCRIT, Sports biographies must include at least one reference to a source providing significant coverage of the subject, excluding database sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. C 679 16:10, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Michal Bojnanský for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michal Bojnanský is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michal Bojnanský until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

⋆｡˚꒰ঌ Clara A. Djalim ໒꒱˚｡⋆ 13:16, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]