User talk:CDRL102

May 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 2016 Formula One season, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. T v x1 11:09, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Smiler

I removed the unsourced material again (diff). Although sources may exist, keep in mind that the material shouldn't be on Wikipedia until those sources are provided as references. See WP:V and WP:CITE for more information. Also, not all factual information about a topic has to be included. Only significant material that helps advance the understanding of a topic should be. Trivial facts should often be avoided, except where it adds encyclopedic value. If you decide to provide references for the material and re-add it to the article, I suggest discussing it on the article's talk page first to obtain consensus. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 12:06, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Saw – The Ride, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. GoneIn60 (talk) 22:57, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see why you're bringing this to me, I reverted it to 8, then another user said (8 but since the Smiler incident 4), which now means the ride has 4 trains, with your reverted edit, it still assumes only 4 trains, with an explanation. So you pick, 8 or 4 CDRL102 (talk) 23:00, 14 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I didn't look that deep into the history and thought I was reverting back to the time it said 8 (with nothing in parenthesis). That infobox parameter only accepts a single number anyway, in order for the text that appears in the infobox to display correctly. Thanks for fixing this. --GoneIn60 (talk) 20:57, 15 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Burt Reynolds may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
publisher=Biography Channel}}), for example, while other sources show that he was born in [Waycross,Georgia[http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-29786802.html The ''Palm Beach Post'', June 28,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:18, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ted (franchise) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ted (franchise) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ted (franchise) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:52, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ted (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Barrett. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 16 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ricky Groves, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 19:03, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletions

The lead is supposed to summarize the body and so some repetition will naturally occur. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:49, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I took another look at Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section and realised I was wrong so I reverted my edits. Thanks. CDRL102 (talk) 18:50, 26 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CUTPASTE

Please see WP:CUTPASTE. Cutting and pasting is not the proper way to move a page. I don't disagree with what you're trying to achieve, but that's not the way to do it. At this point, we may need the help of an "administrator". —BarrelProof (talk) 19:12, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, because the talk page didn't switch over with the actual page I didn't know how else to go about it. CDRL102 (talk) 19:25, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have submitted a request at WP:RMTR. I expect it to be fixed shortly. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just use the ~~rename~~move option. That works for talk pages too. T v x1 19:30, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A non-admin can't move a page if the destination name contains something that has been edited. —BarrelProof (talk) 19:34, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know how to move pages, but I wasn't able to move it myself. CDRL102 (talk) 19:36, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's been taken care of by an admin in the meantime. If you ever would have to move something to a destination name thatcontains something that has been edited, just request a speedy deletion on the destination page under criterion G6. That will make room for the move. T v x1 19:45, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

For purposes such as this one, using WP:RMTR may be more appropriate, and may more quickly achieve the desired result, than g6. —BarrelProof (talk) 22:19, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Oval

This article has been restored to the status quo by admin action because a proper discussion process had not taken place. If you wish to raise another move request you can do so but please make sure that it is done in process. Also, a notice should be placed at WT:CRIC as its project members have a direct interest in the subject, given the historical and contemporary status of the venue, and their views should be ascertained. Jack | ^{talk page} 06:44, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mafia (series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 12 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2015 Formula One season

I have initiated a discussion on the matter of Vergne here. Please discuss it there so as not to violate WP:3RR. Thank you. Twirly Pen (Speak ^up) 04:36, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited UTV (TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ITV. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:45, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Drive (2016 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Allen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Scr★pIron^IV 18:09, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I feel you have something against me, you have your sources, I'm trying to make small improvements and you're reverting them, what's your deal? If I was writing some ridiculous stuff I'd get it, but I'm not, it's factual. CDRL102 (talk) 18:11, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Downtown shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 18:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Downtown. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Scr★pIron^IV 18:12, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Funny, you were edit warring on Wellington College Belfast with me weren't you, then left it a few weeks to revert so you weren't called out for edit warring. Good call. CDRL102 (talk) 18:13, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joanie and Zak's children

Hi,

I wanted to discuss the inclusion of Joanie on Zak's childrens pages and vice versa. His children are adults, apart from Belle, and some Joanie hasn't met. They don't see her as a mother figure, unlike with Lisa and there's no relationship between them.

Thanks, Grangehilllover (talk) 19:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, well, for example Ian Beale has Phil Mitchell as his step-father, even though Ian was an adult and they weren't particularly friendly, but he still is. I think the rule in WP:Soaps is that only those who have appeared on-screen are given the reference, so Joanie would be step-mother to Belle in this case. CDRL102 (talk) 20:19, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Ian and Phil are included because their long-running feud relates to that specific relationship. Take 2 other EastEnders characters then-Bradley and Tanya. They are not noted because of the same reason Joanie and Zak's kids. Or take Janine and her stepmothers Pat and Peggy-Pat is noted as she raised Janine through her childhood and even though she was a minor when Frank married Peggy, there was no real relationship between Peggy and Janine..

Grangehilllover (talk) 20:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

You removed a phrase from The Incredible Hulk (roller coaster) because there was no source. Next time you have 2 option: Put a citation needed tag or find a source yourself. I searched up on Google for a source and it popped up at the top of the results. Please don't revert an edit without a source, unless you have took the time to find a source. Hawkeye75 (talk) 08:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Removing unsourced information from an article is a perfectly viable option. There is no policy or guideline which forces us to maintaim unsourced information pending verification. The Burden on proving information is correct does not lie with the reviewer, but with the original poster. T v x1 10:20, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well I didn't remove it for not having a source, because it is knowledge to theme park fans - at least UOR fans - that those rollercoasters do have the new metal detectors. I removed the rambling part of the sentence that listed what loose articles may be, because that's irrelevant. User:GoneIn60 removed it for no source. CDRL102 (talk) 16:31, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hawkeye75, it is incorrect to say you only have those two options. Adding information without a source is subjecting it to removal upon challenge. Unless it's an obvious fact that would never be challenged (such as "The Eiffel Tower is in Paris"), then the editor adding the information needs to provide the source to begin with. As Tvx1 stated, that's where the burden lies. Also per WP:ONUS, not all verifiable information found on a topic is guaranteed inclusion on Wikipedia. It's relevance and significance play a factor. Stating that metal detectors were added is a very insignificant detail. This article is mostly about the ride and its theme, and we shouldn't focus on details that won't stand the test of time. Discuss on the article's talk page to gain consensus if you want to include it. --GoneIn60 (talk) 14:41, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Grand Prix 2015

The only source for their entry in 2015 is an Autosport article aboout Haas that says that they were one of a group of teams "believed to be" putting an entry for that year in,back in 2014. Is that really good enough? Britmax (talk) 09:02, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well you have a 2015 section so? Also, type "Stefan GP 2015" into google and you'll find they had a bid that was withdrawn. CDRL102 (talk) 09:17, 18 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ted (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jupiter Award. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CDRL102. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CDRL102. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, CDRL102. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barney Bowers, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Irish League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Barney Bowers

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.glentoran.com/glentoran-legends-xi, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:18, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]