User talk:Baby16

Thanx

thanx 4 answering. HOW DO U CREATE A PAGE? --The lil lady with the hat 23:29, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Welcome

Hello, Baby16, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you will enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! You can sign your name on talk and voting pages using four tildes, (~~~~), which produces your username, the time, and the date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump, or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- getcrunk juice ^contribs 00:35, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please use the sandbox for experimenting

Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the Fired Up (song) and Clay Aiken pages on Wikipedia! Your tests worked, and thank you for reverting or removing them yourself. The best way to do tests in the future would be to use the sandbox. You can look at these pages as well: how to edit a page, the tutorial, and how to write a great article. All of these pages are good places to start. Again, thanks, and we hope that you will like Wikipedia. —ERcheck @ 22:56, 1 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on List of music video directors

Hi, why did you remove Steve Barron from here: [1]? Peter S. 21:47, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

think this is where i post stuff to you. I'm not sure

It's actually on my talk page, here: User talk:Peter S. (just normally click a person's name, then on "discussion" on the top.

I removed that Steve because he's not a music video director.

Actually, the entry says "He made his directorial debut in 1979 and did almost all of his music videos in the 80's, including Billie Jean by Michael Jackson, Burning Up by Madonna, Take on Me by a-ha, and videos for Bryan Adams". So I think he did some music videos, don't you think? I'm adding it back, if you don't mind. Cheers, Peter S. 12:15, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No probs. Sorry.

You're welcome :-) By the way, you can sign your messages by adding four "~" at the end, so that everybody knows who wrote something in talk pages. Welcome to wikipedia, it's a great place here! :-) Peter S. 20:12, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's never too late to say thanks

Baby16, I appreciate your note. It is never too late to say thanks. I'm glad to see that you are still editing on Wikipedia. Thanks for contributing. — ERcheck (talk) 01:59, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Uploading pictures

I know i might seem stupid but i can't understand how to upload pictures. And since i don't have anyone to explain it to me. & i don't know any other Wikipedians I was wondering if you could tell me how to in layman's terms please? And sorry if i'm bothering you or wasting your time. Baby16 23:55, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Hi! There is a link on the left side called "Upload file" that does the trick. Before you do it, I would suggest reading Wikipedia:Uploading images. And if you have other questions, you can ask me or - faster and better - ask the community here: Wikipedia:Help desk. There is a huge section for everything about wikipedia, called "Community Portal", available through the link on the left side. From there you'll find all those other links I gave you. Hope that helps! :-) Cheers! Peter S. 12:31, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Aly & A.J On The Cover of their new cd Acoustic Hearts of Winter.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Aly & A.J On The Cover of their new cd Acoustic Hearts of Winter.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:05, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

Been offline a bit and just got your message. You probably found the picture by following the link above. Here it is again — Image:Aly & A.J On The Cover of their new cd Acoustic Hearts of Winter.JPG. BTW, please follow the instructions above on licensing to make sure that the image does not need to be deleted because of licensing problems. — ERcheck (talk) 02:29, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Timberlake contributions

Hi. There has been some massive vandalism to the Justin Timberlake article, and I had to revert fairly far back. Unfortunately, you made some changes in the meantime; because these vandals engaged in multiple article vandalism, I don't have time to re-add in all the new fixes. If you would like, please feel free to put your changes back in. thanks! --Patstuart 03:35, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Giver

Hi. You need to give some sort of reference about the novel The Giver by Lois Lowry. Otherwise, somebody will possibly remove it one day. See this article Wikipedia:Citing sources. Regards --Bondego 22:16, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Womanizer

That is the official cover of the CD single. Do not remove it. Charmed36 (talk) 22:53, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

all bold

Your habit of making comments double spaced and in bold text is distracting and annoying. There's no reason to try to make your comments stand out from other editors' comments. If you have interesting and worthwhile things to say, people will respond without you having to do things to call attention to them.—Kww(talk) 18:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

fixed

User:Katharineamy got to it first. It was an improperly closed reference.—Kww(talk) 21:27, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alicia Keys and personal life section

Hi there Baby16, I see you've added a personal life section in the Alicia Keys article. Please note that such sections are generally discouraged, as they tend be no more than sections open to unencyclopedic gossip and tabloid content. It may also interest you to review the talk page, as there was a discussion regarding this issue, which can be found Talk:Alicia Keys#Personal Life. Additionally, some of the most well-written articles exclude such sections, like Michael Jackson and Janet Jackson. Essentially, I'm asking for you to undo your recent edit and initiate a discussion on the article's talk page to see what other editors think. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 02:13, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I Apologize For My Lack Of Knowledge. I Understand.

Thank You!

P.S. You've Already Undid It. :)

'Baby16' 04:44, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, did after seeing your reply. I figured you had missed it.

— ξ ^xplicit 05:01, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. I Appreciate It. By The Way, How Do You Become An Administrator? Do Large Edits On A Lot Of Articles (Correctly & Knowledgably, of course)?

'Baby16' 05:08, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are several qualities the community seeks when an editor makes a request for adminship (RFA). There's a guide that should consider reviewing, as it gives an overview on how RFAs work, what to expect and what others are expecting in potential candidates. — ξ ^xplicit 06:47, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks For Your Advice. A Lot Of Editors Are Incredibly Rude. I've Been An Editor Here A Long Time But Only "Minor" Edit & Occasional Citations (which personally isn't easy lol).

'Baby16' 21:52, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Brandy

I've added my comments about the name of the Brandy article... Brandy only ever used Brandy as a professional name, just like Madonna or Rihanna. I never ever saw her go by Brandy Norwood professionally. Madonna's article is entitled Madonna (entertainer), not Madonna Ciccone, Rihanna's article is entitled Rihanna, not Robyn Fenty or Robyn Rihanna Fenty. I don't understand why Brandy's article is any different. Unlike Beyoncé that sometimes goes by Beyoncé Knowles professionally, Brandy always goes by Brandy. For that reason, she should be named Brandy throughout the whole article. Yeah. The article should defintely be named Brandy (entertainer). She goes by one name, just like Madonna or Rihanna. I never saw her use her last name professionally. Israell (talk) 19:56, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Zuria Vega, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mexican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:45, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thank You For Letting Me Know Of My Mistake =)

I'll Fix It Right Now

--Baby16 21:23, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big TV!

The article Big TV! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of WP:notability. Only reference is to a directory listing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 09:50, 28 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Big TV!

The article Big TV! has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG. Only refs are dead.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 18:58, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Big TV! for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Big TV! is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Big TV! until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 19:04, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]