User talk:Anuhek
|
I have restored this move to WP:COMMONNAME per Bernard Rosensweig Ashkenazic Jewry in Transition 1975 p11 "Chapter II THE LIFE OF R. JACOB WEIL", very typical of Google Book and Google Scholar sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:43, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Actually that was done with User Marecheth Ho'eElohuth - In ictu oculi (talk) 00:31, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Possible conflict of interest?
[edit]Kehuna, You have been tagged by a bot twice.
- 00:51, 25 June 2012 (diff | hist) . . (+205) . . The status quo Kohen (→See also) (Tag: possible conflict of interest)
- 00:41, 25 June 2012 (diff | hist) . . (+249) . . Mitzvah to kohanim to sound silver trumpets (Tag: possible conflict of interest)
I have not reported this, but your duplication of article content at. http://kehuna.org/silver-trumpets/ and advertising there "The price of the trumpet is 1,750.00$ (subject to change), and requires 2 weeks for delivery (US orders)." is likely to come to everyone's attention since I had a good faith WP:RM in process trying to improve the article at Talk:Mitzvah to kohanim to sound silver trumpets, and I have also asked User Debresser his opinion. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:31, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
As I say, I have not reported this to Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard, so have not added the coin-notice. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:31, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, what do you want me to do? In ictu oculi (talk) 11:12, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- User seems not to respond so will have to do this via COI.
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:19, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mitzvah to kohanim to sound silver trumpets
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Mitzvah to kohanim to sound silver trumpets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. OlYeller21Talktome 02:34, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Your category merge suggestion
[edit]As the placed merge template states, your suggestion to merge Category:Law of Moses into Category:Mitzvoth was not procedurally correct. I have change it into {{Category see also}} templates in both directions. (Note: I am not familiar with the subject -- the reverse see also may not be needed.) If you feel the merge should be considered the correct process is found at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion. Mark Hurd (talk) 02:17, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
September 2012
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "Kehuna", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, or website, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are promotional or have the appearance of shared use. Please take a moment to create a new account or request a username change that represents only yourself as an individual. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline and remember that promotional editing is not acceptable regardless of the username you choose. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. NTox · talk 22:07, 12 September 2012 (UTC)
Undiscussed moves
[edit]- 23:07, 18 December 2012 Anuhek moved page Obadiah ben Jacob Sforno to Ovadyah Sforno
- 18:17, 13 December 2012 Anuhek moved page Solomon Adeni to Shlomo Adeni
- 23:02, 22 November 2012 Anuhek moved page Samson ben Abraham of Sens to Shimshon of Sens
Please, you have been asked before to not make moves of this kind counter sources in article without use of WP:RM. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:02, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
Your move of Solomon Adeni may be reverted
[edit]Hello Anuhek. Please see this request to undo your move of Solomon Adeni. It would be helpful if you could respond at Talk:Shlomo Adeni#Undiscussed move and explain why you think this move was wise. You seem to have made a number of moves recently that do not have any obvious rationale. It is better to use the WP:Requested moves process in these cases. This would allow others to comment on the proposals. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:58, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- Please click this link Then please explain here why you moved this article to a spelling not consistent with sources in article. Thanks. ...should also note that this is getting disruptive. The next move you make should not be undiscussed, at the least discuss open a topic on the Talk page of an article to see what other users - users who have worked on the article in question - think. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Given that the article consisted of no text and one external link I have Redirected it into Distressing and copied the external link there. This is the usual English term. Just a note that only came across this as an oddity when following recent undiscussed moves - article couldn't be left as a single line of unsourced text even if it wasn't a duplicate. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
- y have u been following undiscussed moves?--Anuhek (talk) 01:46, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
Website links
[edit]- Sorry Kehuna, but keep on coming across these moves and additions of websites, it isn't personal, some of these articles are on my watchlist. Please check in English sources prior to renaming bios. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:13, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
- what has them being on your wathclist to do with these removals? is there a wiki law banning NFP website links? --Anuhek (talk) 00:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Being on my watchlist means I see when changes are made to those articles, and when I see a change by yourself who already has a history of adding the website that was retailing products (silver trumpets) then I go to the page to see what was added. And yes there is a law banning website links which are connected to the person adding the links. It's called WP:COI and you have already had this rule pointed out to you above. If you add the website again someone, probably me since the pages you're likely to add it are likely to be on my watchlist, is going to revert it, and probably take you back to COI Noticeboard. Please stop promoting your website. Unless you can first address on the Talk page of a given article why your website should be added. Cheers. This is normal practice followed by all editors, you aren't being singled out. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- lets do this on a per article basis, for example, the levite link titled "24 places kohanim are called leviim" is neutral by all means. aside for the fact that the website is promoting silver trumpets as a service and not-for-profit. it seems you r taking COI out of context to me, are you biased in any event?--Anuhek (talk) 01:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- I don't believe that COI distinguishes between marketing something for profit or not. But anyway if you consider I am biased (yes I am biased against websites which retail things being added, even by unconnected editors) then it's better someone at COI Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard who you won't consider biased adjudicates. Best wishes. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- lets do this on a per article basis, for example, the levite link titled "24 places kohanim are called leviim" is neutral by all means. aside for the fact that the website is promoting silver trumpets as a service and not-for-profit. it seems you r taking COI out of context to me, are you biased in any event?--Anuhek (talk) 01:37, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- Being on my watchlist means I see when changes are made to those articles, and when I see a change by yourself who already has a history of adding the website that was retailing products (silver trumpets) then I go to the page to see what was added. And yes there is a law banning website links which are connected to the person adding the links. It's called WP:COI and you have already had this rule pointed out to you above. If you add the website again someone, probably me since the pages you're likely to add it are likely to be on my watchlist, is going to revert it, and probably take you back to COI Noticeboard. Please stop promoting your website. Unless you can first address on the Talk page of a given article why your website should be added. Cheers. This is normal practice followed by all editors, you aren't being singled out. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:50, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
- what has them being on your wathclist to do with these removals? is there a wiki law banning NFP website links? --Anuhek (talk) 00:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard/Archive_61#Kehuna.org_and_User:Kehuna.2C_now_Anuhek --Anuhek (talk) 22:55, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of Circumcision in ancient Egypt (rabbinic literature) for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Circumcision in ancient Egypt (rabbinic literature) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Circumcision in ancient Egypt (rabbinic literature) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.