User talk:AndrewIb

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AndrewIb! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 22:45, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wall Street Finance tagged for deletion

Hello AndrewIb, I wanted to let you know that I've tagged Wall Street Finance for deletion because its text appears to be copied from a copyrighted source. There are very few cases where one can directly copy text into Wikipedia.

Additionally, the article doesn't state how the subject of the article is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia (WP:A7). See also WP:GNG.

– Thjarkur (talk) 20:32, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thjarkur Hi the article i guess in't all copy and paste but yes i can update it but why this news website doesn't achieve notability? — Preceding unsigned comment added by AndrewIb (talk • contribs) 01:41, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- A website existing is by itself not a claim to significance (a claim to significance can for example be "the site was awarded the X journalism award", but can also be demonstrated by showing that the subject has received independent coverage). "Notability" on Wikipedia usually means that independent sources have found the subject to be worthy of note, and have therefore written about it (see WP:GNG). As far as I could see, independent reliable sources haven't written about the site, and press releases don't count towards demonstrating notability. – Thjarkur (talk) 13:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Orient XXI

The article Orient XXI has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Corporate article which does not pass WP:NCORP and was created by blocked account.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 04:25, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]