User talk:Alotorus

Hi, can you explain me how do we add a copyright tag? And also how to get a copyright free image? Where did you get those images of BLR airport T2???

June 2021

Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Agra Metro, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ashley yoursmile! 16:13, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at New Delhi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 16:32, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at National Capital Region (India), you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 17:18, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at National Capital Region (India). — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:28, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Ganga Expressway, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:27, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alotorus (talk) 08:40, 10 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Native names

Hi. Please note that native names are not allowed per WP:NOINDICSCRIPTS. Please observe the policy. — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:19, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mopa Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chandel. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:55, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Common names

Hi. Please refrain from using names against WP:COMMONNAME as you did at Bangalore–Chennai Expressway Special:Diff/1044158824/1045172533. I'm not sure if it was clear when I reverted your changes of Allahabad–>Prayagraj. If you want to see the usage of the new name, you need to establish and prove it in the talk page of the respective city. — DaxServer (talk to me) 10:27, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:05, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hi, The image of T2 you have added at BLR Airport is just the Phase-1 image. So, i want you to change the title of the image to T2 phase-1. You can let me know your email id in my Talk page, I can send you the image of T2 with both of the phases. You can consider adding even that to wikipedia. Thankyou. Random Haste (talk) 06:53, 18 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Alotorus! Your additions to Velana International Airport have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Signed,The4lines |||| ^{(Talk) (Contributions)} 16:46, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't copy content from other websites

Hello. I am Moneytrees and I am a Wikipedia administrator. Text you find online is almost always copyrighted, and cannot be copied here; it's against the copyright policy of this website to do so. After I revision deleted the copyrighted content you added to Velana International Airport, I went through previous edits of yours to see if you had previously copied content from sources. Here's what I found, and removed:

On Veer Savarkar International Airport, I removed your addition copy and pasted from this cited source and this cited source.
On Halwara Air Force Station, I removed your addition taken from https://www.tribuneindia.com/news/ludhiana/hp-firm-to-build-interim-terminal-building-350475
On Lokpriya Gopinath Bordoloi International Airport, I removed three paragraphs copied from https://m.economictimes.com/industry/transportation/airlines-/-aviation/guwahati-aiports-new-rs-1232-crore-integrated-terminal-expected-to-be-ready-by-june-2022/amp_articleshow/78534525.cms
On Delhi–Meerut Regional Rapid Transit System, I removed content copied from https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/delhi/up-to-speed-delhis-jangpura-finds-place-on-rrts-corridor-map/articleshow/87450437.cms. You only copied a sentence here, but that is still more than you should be copying.

All text must be written in your own words. The Wikipedia copyright policy and its application are complex matters, and you should not edit any more until you have taken the time to read and understand our copyright policy. There's a simplified version of our copyright rules at Wikipedia:FAQ/Copyright. Further copyright issues will result in you being blocked from editing. If you have any questions, please ask, I will try to respond as soon as possible. Moneytrees🏝️^{Talk/CCI guide} 04:21, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

When adding links to material on external sites, as you did to Chenab Rail Bridge, please ensure that the external site is not violating the creator's copyright. Linking to websites that display copyrighted works is acceptable as long as the website's operator has created or licensed the work. Knowingly directing others to a site that violates copyright may be considered contributory infringement. This is particularly relevant when linking to sites such as YouTube or Sci-Hub, where due care should be taken to avoid linking to material that violates its creator's copyright. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe the linked site is not violating copyright with respect to the material, then you should do one of the following:

If the linked site is the copyright holder, leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page;
If a note on the linked site credibly claims permission to host the material, or a note on the copyright holder's site grants such permission, leave a note on the article Talk page with a link to where we can find that note;
If you are the copyright holder or the external site administrator, adjust the linked site to indicate permission as above and leave a note on the article Talk page;

If the material is available on a different site that satisfies one of the above conditions, link to that site instead. — DaxServer (t · c) 14:05, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Indira Gandhi International Airport. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Do not change the WP:COMMONNAME of the city which is Bangalore in Wikipedia. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:59, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Cochin International Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Do not change the WP:COMMONNAME in Wikipedia of the city. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:36, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thiruvananthapuram International Airport. DO not change the [[WP:COMMONNAME[[ in Wikipedia. You'll be reported.. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:55, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please stop making inappropriate edit's in airlines and destinations section of Deoghar airport as you repeatedly adding multiple layover flight in that section which clearly violates Wikipedia policy as only non stop flights are to be considered for that. Do check other airports Wikipedia page for your reference. Flashthomsom (talk) 13:26, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is non-stop as well as connecting, for your kind information. Please check the citation website by translating the site to English. Alotorus (talk) 13:33, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The citation you provided is not reliable first of all. The prabhat khabar provide misleading news most of time. Please check Jharsuguda Airport and Rajamundry airport. Do you find any sort of layover flights mentioned there rather other than direct one's Flashthomsom (talk) 14:34, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't provide any fake, misleading or inappropriate news reports. It is fully reliable. For your kind information, the flights will be both layover flights and direct flights, as mentioned in the news report itself. The news agency which provided the report, is one of the best local news agencies in India. Alotorus (talk) 15:09, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Then why most of the airport in india don't have their connecting flight mention in destination section. Flashthomsom (talk) 15:44, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Go check out nearest darbhanga airport, did you find any lay-over flights mentioned there ? You will only find the direct one's because it's very obvious that airport will interconnected via each other by some layover, that doest mean that you can all that destination in that list. Use common sense !! Flashthomsom (talk) 16:15, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The flights will be DIRECT as well as LAYOVER/CONNECTING, for your kind information. Even if it is a layover flight, it should be mentioned in all airport destination lists. Please mind your language, the way you have written, is completely inappropriate. Alotorus (talk) 05:09, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Never use the word 'Use common sense !!' in that manner, or else there will be a negative impression on you from all sides. Alotorus (talk) 05:11, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Give me any airport name where you see connecting flights are mentioned. Flashthomsom (talk) 06:48, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

For example, check in Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj International Airport's destination list. In Air Canada's section, you will find that a connecting flight will begin from Mumbai to London Heathrow Airport from 29 October 2022. The flight will be a CONNECTING/LAYOVER flight, as it will go to Toronto from Mumbai via London Heathrow Airport, daily, as a stopover. Alotorus (talk) 06:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Deoghar Airport. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. 2600:1700:D0A0:21B0:34A3:8C98:350B:62D1 (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop reverting edit's or else you would be banned. Flashthomsom (talk) 08:18, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only direct flights

This edit, is incorrect. We do not add connecting flights/airports. Only direct fights. The source specifically says that - "दिल्ली के साथ-साथ मुंबई, चेन्नई व बेंगलुरु के लिए देवघर एयरपोर्ट से कनेक्टिंग फ्लाइट की सुविधा दी जा रही है". Revert your additions please. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:29, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This one also is a connecting flight. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:32, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I said him couple of times but every time he disagree. Now the article page of Deoghar Airport is granted for protection. Flashthomsom (talk) 10:44, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 8

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kolhapur Airport, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alliance Air.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aircraft

Please note that the plural of aircraft is aircraft and not aircrafts. So one aircraft and six aircraft. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 21:12, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry sir, maybe you are mistaken. I have not edited the article in which you have changed to proper format. It is edited by someone else. Thank you. Alotorus (talk) 05:51, 12 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chenab Rail Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Northern Railway.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mumbai–Nagpur Expressway, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Capital of Maharashtra.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rajiv Gandhi International Airport. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. — LeoFrank ^Talk 12:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

United Airlines San Francisco-Bangalore

You continue to add outdated sources for this service. United has removed this route completely. Please see: https://www.aeroroutes.com/eng/221121-uans23sfoblr. Jz0610 (talk) 05:59, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at :RIA (airline), you may be blocked from editing. Industrial Arthropod (talk) 22:50, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alotorus (talk) 10:20, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Alotorus. Thank you for your work on New Siem Reap-Angkor International Airport. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:17, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@SunDawn: Most welcome. Thank you too! Alotorus (talk) 04:35, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of ————

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on ———— requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Industrial Arthropod (talk) 12:11, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I would like that article to be deleted at the earliest. Thank you very much! Alotorus (talk) 12:13, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't change redirects or move articles/redirects to titles like this. It is very disruptive and I'm now cleaning up after some of these page moves. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:46, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thanks for thanking me.

Industrial Arthropod (talk) 12:22, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Most welcome! 🤗🤗😋😋😋 Alotorus (talk) 12:24, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Phang Nga airport, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ost (talk) 07:28, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can understand very well, but the only problem I have is that they edited the article in such a manner that it looked like the way as if it is written in a rough notebook, and did not look like an article at all, that's why I removed the article. Alotorus (talk) 12:07, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Draft:Singkawang International Airport has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. This is your third warning. — Diannaa (talk) 21:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Phang Nga airport, you may be blocked from editing. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 14:29, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Phang Nga airport. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 14:30, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Someone who's wrong on the internet I request you, please, remove that article and do not fill the same improperly formatted article as it was done by a few editors before, who damaged the article's format grammatically, format, sentence framing, and removed important sections. It was absolutely perfect before their disruptive editings. They are the ones who are promoting to remove the article.

If my request mentioned above gets accepted, I would be quite grateful. Thank you. Alotorus (talk) 14:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop edit warring. Thank you! Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 14:36, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. PhilKnight (talk) 14:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks PhilKnight for the appropriate action. Looking at the user's lengthy history of competence issues reflected in the above talk page messages, it's a bit surprising that it took this long. --Paul_012 (talk) 17:16, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Phang-Nga—Andaman International Airport

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Phang-Nga—Andaman International Airport. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Phang Nga airport. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Phang Nga airport. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Paul_012 (talk) 17:19, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Paul 012: Thank you very much! Will surely create more valuable and informative contributions ahead. Alotorus (talk) 07:48, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A humble request

@PhilKnight:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alotorus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am sorry for the disruptive editing I did in that article. I really realise my mistake now and I want myself to be unblocked. Now I have realised, that Wikipedia, as everyone knows, is a free encyclopaedia where everyone can read and edit articles freely, and if engaged in disruptions and disputes by editing articles against other editors, it will result in this.

I promise truly, from the next time, that I will not engage in a single dispute with any editor. Please, give me a single chance. I really promise you and myself that I will never misuse it. If my request is accepted, I will be very grateful. Thank you. Alotorus (talk) 06:50, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We will need more than your promise- many people tell us they want "one chance" to prove themselves and they often blow it. I don't want to see that happen to you, so please be more specific about how you were disruptive and what you will do to avoid that again in the future, such as how you will resolve disputes without edit warring and how you will properly source contributions. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 08:55, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alotorus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason: I will resolve disputes without edit warring such as leaving further editing which will arise conflicts with others, and will not edit war even if I am correct, I will properly source contributions by accepting other editors opinions and working by collaborating with each other and working cooperatively with no conflicts or disputes with each other, and if anyone does so, I will try to resolve them with the help of an administrator, and will end such issues at the earliest. These are my promises. I will really fulfill them. If I get oy a single chance, I will never misuse it, and if I do it, then any administrator will block me immediately and will never unblock me. I really do promise it. If my above mentioned points get accepted, I would be really grateful to it. Thank you.

Decline reason:

No, this is not how you should resolve conflicts. Please reread Wikipedia:Consensus. Yamla (talk) 10:43, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alotorus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason: I have thoroughly gone through the consensus that you advised me to check. It states that all editors must follow the consensus steps, which is similar to Law-makers of a country. They are also subject to rules and they must not engage with any type of conflict or dispute within themselves. The goal is to resolve disputes in a way that reflects Wikipedia's goals and policies while cooperating with editors. Editors with good social skills and good negotiation skills result in productive outcomes. Decision making and reaching consensus involve an effort to incorporate all editors' concerns, and always keeping in mind Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Substantive, informative explanations indicate what issues need to be addressed in subsequent efforts to reach consensus. Explanations are especially important when reverting another editor's good-faith work. This is how all editors should work with collaboration and cooperation with each other on Wikipedia. If anyone caught disputing or conflicting, they should be first warned, and if still not affected, then must be punished. I have understood everything perfectly. So, please, I request myself to be unblocked. I am promising really that I will never engage in any disruptive activities with anyone, and will work only according to the consensus mentioned above. If my request and points receive approval, I will be very grateful. Thank you.

Decline reason:

No. One at a time. Drmies (talk) 15:15, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alotorus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason:Due to repetitive disruptive editing for three consecutive warnings I have been blocked by an administrator indefinitely with no fixed duration for the block. Now, I have accepted and realised the mistake that I did as I did not know the consequences. I have gone through the consensus after the advisory of an administrator on how should I resolve disputes and create productive content on Wikipedia. It states on how to follow the rules sincerely and properly to edit on Wikipedia with fellow editors without creating any disruptions or disputes with each other, and if did, then will the result will be given by an administrator so that that editor cannot create disputes anymore. I am promising truly, that if I get only one more chance, I will not misuse it anymore, and even if I do, I will think twice, and then only, will l edit with editors cooperatively on Wikipedia. I have requested three times for unblocking me, but without any response still now, and it has been over two days since I am blocked. So, I request all respected administrators working on Wikipedia to unblock me, and give me a second and last chance. I promise to all of you and myself that I will never take advantage of the second chance again as I did before. If my request gets accepted, I will be humbly grateful to all respected administrators and will fulfill the promise. Thank you.

Decline reason:

No. One at a time. Drmies (talk) 15:16, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Another unblock request

@Yamla:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alotorus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason: I have thoroughly gone through the consensus that you advised me to check. It states that all editors must follow the consensus steps, which is similar to Law-makers of a country. They are also subject to rules and they must not engage with any type of conflict or dispute within themselves. The goal is to resolve disputes in a way that reflects Wikipedia's goals and policies while cooperating with editors. Editors with good social skills and good negotiation skills result in productive outcomes. Decision making and reaching consensus involve an effort to incorporate all editors' concerns, and always keeping in mind Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Substantive, informative explanations indicate what issues need to be addressed in subsequent efforts to reach consensus. Explanations are especially important when reverting another editor's good-faith work. This is how all editors should work with collaboration and cooperation with each other on Wikipedia. If anyone caught disputing or conflicting, they should be first warned, and if still not affected, then must be punished. I have understood everything perfectly. So, please, I request myself to be unblocked. I am promising really that I will never engage in any disruptive activities with anyone, and will work only according to the consensus mentioned above. If my request and points receive approval, I will be very grateful. Thank you.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. User does not wish this request to be reviewed. Yamla (talk) 13:20, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

STOP. You have three (!!!) open unblock requests. And stop pinging me. I've already reviewed one of your requests, so another admin will review whichever ONE of the three (!!!) open unblock requests you actually want to be reviewed. --Yamla (talk) 09:32, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: Please, give me a second chance, I request humbly that I will work with the rules that I promised to follow which must be followed by all editors, the consensus. I truly promise you and myself that whenever I edit on Wikipedia I will never dispute or edit war with any other editor and will work strictly according to the consensus, and will make full and proper use of the second chance. I really don't want to disturb you and you might be thinking that if you unblock me, I will redo the unwanted actions again, but I promise that I will never do it again. As you are one of the many, highly experienced and respected admins on Wikipedia for decades, and also as you are in contact with me, only you can help me to unblock myself, I really request and promise as described above. Please, if you accept my request, I will be really grateful. Thank you. Alotorus (talk) 15:12, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have closed two of the requests, because Yamla is correct. I strongly encourage you to stop groveling and not make "humble requests"--you can just ask--or try to butter up the admins here. We're all highly experienced and respected, but saying that won't make it any more likely that you will be unblocked. I am not going to decide on your last unblock request, because I just went through your edits and I don't really see whether they're worth the price of disruption. PhilKnight, no one is more experienced and respected than you--do you have any new thoughts? Drmies (talk) 15:22, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: I am very sorry for whatever I have done and for that reason I have been blocked. Please, forgive me, give me a second chance, I request humbly that I will work with the rules that I promised to follow which must be followed by all editors, the consensus. I truly promise you and myself that whenever I edit on Wikipedia I will never dispute or edit war with any other editor and will work strictly according to the consensus, and will make full and proper use of the second chance. I really don't want to disturb you and you might be thinking that if you unblock me, I will redo the unwanted actions again, but I promise that I will never do it again. I really give you a real assurance, request and promise as described above. Please, if you accept my request, I will be really grateful. Thank you. Alotorus (talk) 12:11, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Drmies: - Thanks for the kind words. I am inclined to give him a last chance. Unblocks are cheap, and this would be a final chance to show he can edit constructively. PhilKnight (talk) 16:42, 17 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight: Thank you very much, sir, for accepting my request. I am surely promising that I will make a full proper use as I promised before of the final chance. Alotorus (talk) 05:47, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please indent your posts by adding colons (:) see WP:INDENT for details. I have not unblocked you, as the blocking admin, I will leave that to another admin. PhilKnight (talk) 16:28, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight: Sir, if you don't mind, then could you please unblock me, as there is no response from anyone and it's been over 4-5 days since you assured me. So, I am sending an unblock request so that you approve and unblock me. If you or any other admin who sees the request and approves it, I will be grateful. Expecting for a quick reply. Thank you.:Alotorus (talk) 12:59, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are still not indenting your posts. I am not going to unblock you. You need to post a fresh unblock request. PhilKnight (talk) 14:27, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Despite earlier warnings to only have one open unblock request at a time, you now have two. Which one do you want admins to review? Are you sufficiently capable to close one of the two open unblock requests yourself? --Yamla (talk) 13:09, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Now three: UTRS appeal #67114, which I just declined. --Yamla (talk) 13:12, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: No, sir, I am certainly not at all capable of unblocking myself as the blocked user as all administrators have that power only, to do so. If you advise, then I will not add anymore unblock requests. I am sorry to do that. I accept your request without any problem. I want to review only the one I sent to PhilKnight. I have removed the earlier request. Alotorus (talk) 13:18, 22 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@PhilKnight:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alotorus (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

reason:Due to repetitive disruptive editing for three consecutive warnings I have been blocked by an administrator indefinitely with no fixed duration for the block. Now, I have accepted and realised the mistake that I did as I did not know the consequences. I have gone through the consensus after the advisory of an administrator on how should I resolve disputes and create productive content on Wikipedia. It states on how to follow the rules sincerely and properly to edit on Wikipedia with fellow editors without creating any disruptions or disputes with each other, and if did, then will the result will be given by an administrator so that that editor cannot create disputes anymore. I am promising truly, that if I get only one more chance, I will not misuse it anymore, and even if I do, I will think twice, and then only, will l edit with editors cooperatively on Wikipedia. I have requested three times for unblocking me. One admin has ensured that I will be unblocked but as he is the blocking admin, so some other admin will unblock me. However, still there is no response from anyone, and it has been over two weeks since I am blocked. So, I request all respected administrators working on Wikipedia to unblock me, and give me a second and last chance. I promise to all of you and myself that I will never take advantage of the second chance again as I did before. If my request gets accepted, I will be humbly grateful to all respected administrators and will fulfill the promise. Thank you. --Alotorus (talk) 09:23, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, I'm declining on CIR grounds. While I don't doubt that you are sincere about wanting to follow the rules, the warnings that litter your talk page (including multiple copyright violations, which are a legal liability for us as a website and a reason to block in themselves), your multiple simultaneous requests, and inability to indent properly suggests to me that you would not be a net positive to the encyclopedia if unblocked.

My advice to you would be to wait six months or more, and then request a standard offer unblock. Making positive contributions to other language Wikipedias or other Wikimedia projects will significantly increase the chances of further appeals being accepted. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:24, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding Draft:New Siem Reap–Angkor International Airport

Hello, Alotorus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:New Siem Reap–Angkor International Airport, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:03, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Singkawang International Airport

Hello, Alotorus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Singkawang International Airport, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:New Siem Reap–Angkor International Airport

Hello, Alotorus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "New Siem Reap–Angkor International Airport".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:56, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Singkawang International Airport

Hello, Alotorus. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Singkawang International Airport".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:47, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]