User talk:2601:447:4100:C120:88F0:1D3:2AE2:B988

January 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Catholic Church sexual abuse cases in Europe. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Elizium23 (talk) 21:29, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Washington Post article is titled "Vatican diplomat implicated in child porn case has served in India and Hong Kong" and is from 2017, so please don't type nonsense.2601:447:4100:C120:88F0:1D3:2AE2:B988 (talk) 21:32, 12 January 2020 (UTC) I noticed you also didn't heed what i wrote in an edit summary about the article also saying "Pope Benedict XVI conferred the rank of “Chaplain of His Holiness” on Capella."2601:447:4100:C120:88F0:1D3:2AE2:B988 (talk) 21:36, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Assassinated v. Death

There is an ongoing RfC on the talk page of the article. The version before the RfC started was asssassinated so it will stay as it is until the outcome of the RfC changes it.--SharʿabSalam▼ (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Takes for the heads up.2601:447:4100:C120:88F0:1D3:2AE2:B988 (talk) 20:41, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.