User talk:174.0.216.163
Caillou Pettis
[edit]Actors are not automatically entitled to have Wikipedia articles just because they've had roles — the notability test for an actor is the degree to which reliable sources have or have not done journalism that is about him and his performances in those roles, not just the ability to technically verify that he's been in stuff. Most of the links you've been spamming everybody's talk page with are not reliable or notability-supporting sources at all — for example, blogs are not permissible as sourcing for Wikipedia articles, so things like Guacamoley and PopHorror and FlickeringMyth don't count for anything, and people don't automatically get into Wikipedia just because they have profiles on IMDb or Rotten tomatoes either. And the few that are actually reliable sources are not covering Caillou Pettis in a noteworthy context — people also do not get into Wikipedia just because they've had one or two pieces of human interest coverage written about something they tweeted. So exactly zero of these links count as substantive support for his notability as an actor at all. People get into Wikipedia by having media coverage about them doing notable stuff, not just by being technically verifiable on the web. And specifically because you've been so persistent about trying to get yourself into Wikipedia for publicity purposes in the past, you are really going to have to make a very solid case for notability, based on much better sources than you've ever shown before, to actually get back in the door — basically, until you can actually honestly claim to have an Oscar or Canadian Screen Award nomination for your acting or filmmaking, don't even try it. Bearcat (talk) 16:16, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
May 2019
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b5/Wikipedia_Checkuser.svg/40px-Wikipedia_Checkuser.svg.png)
If you are not the intended target of this block, please read the information below in order to receive assistance.
IP users (without an account): If you do not have an account and wish to bypass this block, an account can be created to allow you to edit. In general, these blocks only prevent users who are not logged in from editing; once you are logged in, the block will no longer affect you in any way. To request an account, simply click here and follow the directions provided on the page. It is important that you use an e-mail address issued to you by your ISP, school, or organisation, so we may verify that you are a legitimate user. When filling out the account request form, please refer to this block in the "comments" input field. If you've been instructed to request an account via email, please refer to this block in your message.
Registered users (with an account): Please make sure you are logged in to your account. If you are unable to edit while logged in, you may request IP block exemption to bypass blocks unconnected with you that affect your editing. Post an unblock request to your user talk page.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:14, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |