Talk:Weronika Rosati

Weronika Rosati has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 18, 2021. (Reviewed version).

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Activism against domestic violence

I notice the Polish article has a dedicated section about this, but ours only a sentence. I suggest expanding it. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 04:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done ArturSik (talk) 14:30, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Weronika Rosati/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 22:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 22:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox and lead

Here, and in #Acting_career, Inland Empire should link to Inland Empire (film).

Done

Add a comma after "Last Vegas (2013)".

Done

"Aside acting" → "Aside from acting"

Done

Life and career

Early life and education

Remove the comma after "Warsaw Ochota Theatre".

Done

"trained dancing" → "trained in dancing"

Done

"taka" → "take"

Done

Add a comma after "Larry Moss Studio".

Done

Acting career

Add a comma after "panned by critics".

Done

"Polish actors successful" → "successful Polish actors"

Done

The phrase "international scene" doesn't sound right, so try rewording.

Done

"guest starred" → "guest-starred"

Done

"and the 1940s" → "and 1940s"

Done

Personal life and non-acting work

"to leg injury" → "to a leg injury"

Done

Remove the comma after "unable to walk".

Done

"and a continual" → "and continual"

Done

"in relationship" → "in a relationship"

Done

"list of 100" → "list of the 100"

Done

"of Polish" → "of the Polish"

Done

"guest hosted" → "guest-hosted"

Done

Filmography

This section looks good.

References

For the cite bundle after "respectively", add bullet points before each source.

Done

Sources are already archived.
Websites are also linked.

@Some Dude From North Carolina: All done. Thanks so much for your review. ArturSik (talk) 19:39, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Progress

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·