Talk:Waorani people

	Ecuador portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ecuador, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ecuador on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EcuadorWikipedia:WikiProject EcuadorTemplate:WikiProject EcuadorEcuador
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Ethnic groups High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Five American Missionaries

None of them was with SIL: Nate_Saint was with Mission Aviation Fellowship. Jim Elliot, Ed McCully, Pete Fleming were with Christian Missions in Many Lands. Roger Youderian was from Gospel Missionary Union. See Talk:SIL_International or http://justus.anglican.org/resources/bio/74.html and http://www.plymouthbrethren.org/page.asp?page_id=545 --Jabala

What is the source of the death of the 2 Huaorani aspect of the story?

I have read many accounts of the death of the 5 missionaries, and this is the first one that stated (or at least implied) that somehow the missionaries either were the cause of 2 Huaorani deaths or directly .

I'm trying to find out what the source of this other version is, can anyone help? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.34.246.35 (talk • contribs).

Rival's account (2002) states that Dayuma's brother was shot by a missionary (Nate Saint, I think) and died of the wound later. Ill post details soon. --Carwil 20:54, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Original question-asker here.. The book you are using as a source (which I assume is 'Trekking Through History' of 2002) isn't listed in sources below. In that book, which I don't own and have no easy access to, how is the source of the information presented? In other words, in Rival's account, what is her source as to the sequence of events? Having a fun time comparing reports of first hand accounts. Thanks! Once I Make a permanent account, I will be Gryfalia, but am not yet..;-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 12.34.246.35 (talk • contribs).

Rival says

[Rachel Saint and Betty Elliott (and 3-year-old child valerie) arrived at Tihueno with Dayuma.] To this day, the Huaorani trace the legitimate presence of evangelical missionaries within their communities to the lifelong relationship between Dayuma, the Huaorani woman who had lived for many years with the cohuori [outsiders]—and hendce taken for dead—and the North American missionary Rachel Saint, a relationship sealed, as they see it, in the death of their two brothers. Dayuma's brother speared Rachel's brother to death and was injured by a bullet Rachel's brother shot before dying. He died from the injury about a month later. (Rival 2002:158)--Carwil 18:24, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article cites "(Saint, 2005)" as a reference for the tribe's violence, but there is no such reference in the list below. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Feline1 (talk • contribs).

There's discussion of this in Operation Auca as well (see the Attack section). --Spangineer^ws (háblame) 19:17, 8 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Axxn 11:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Taromenane and Onamenane are Tucanoan tribes, by nomeans related to Huao. Nothing is known about Huinatare. This was told by the contacted Tagaeri in 1990s. There have been no peaceful contacts with the Taromenane and nobody knows which language they speak. Then how you can say that Taromenane are Huao?

Axxn 11:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

SIL is now perpetuating ethnic cleansing of Huao. Although it is nice to convert as many as they can, destroying a culture should not be tolerated. It takes just one Rachel Saint to destroy a culture. But a destroyed culture can't be rebuilt by one million Rachel Saints.

Well said, Axxn. I've visited the Oriente and met some Quechua, and I've read Jone Kane, Randy Smith, Yost, and other accounts. I haven't read Colby yet (don't know if my blood pressure could take it now.) This type of cultural destruction was one factor in past calls for a moratorium on foreign missionaries. Most evangelical groups have resisted all such calls.

I've also read a lot about the impact of the oil industry and its very sloppy pactices. This has compounded the destructive pressures on rainforest native peoples. I was just putting a few bits about this into the Petroecuador stub page, then I remembered this whole subject and came over here.

Yea I'm sure it would be so much better for Huaorani if they were again living lawlessly and spearing each other at will. I mean seriously going back to living like a pack of animals would probably be better, right leftist fanatics? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.109.151.197 (talk) 16:11, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If I get some free time I should check if I have any further sources to add on this page, although on first glance this looks very well referenced.Birdbrainscan 18:03, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're aware, I suppose, that SIL hasn't been in Ecuador since the early 1980s? And that Rachel Saint is long dead? How then are these people "perpetuating ethnic cleansing of Huao", particularly "now"?? Mcswell (talk) 03:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the Christian missionaries saved the Huao from being obliterated by the Ecuador military. The Huao are now able to function as reasonable ordinary useful citizens. Doesn't sound like "ethnic cleansing" to me. Just sayin . . . Santamoly (talk) 05:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a forum to parade your opinions and biases folks, no matter how much you hate "missionaries". Please read the talk page guidelines, "The purpose of an article's talk page is to provide space for editors to discuss changes to its associated article or project page. Article talk pages should not be used by editors as platforms for their personal views on a subject." Philip72 (talk) 00:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sources for 'contribut[ing] to the national good'

I went looking for a cite for this statement. I found several other pages that include this text nearly verbatim, and in particular I found a longer text in which these lines are contained. That site is anthropology.net. Unfortunately, (a) their longer text does not give a source for this statement, and (b) our article copies basically verbatim from their article, without sourcing them.

I think this needs to be cleaned up, both to give a proper citation for the material, and to avoid a charge of plagiarism of the anthropology.net text (even if they are a Wiki possibly under a GFDL, we still need to cite them!)Birdbrainscan 18:11, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page move - Waodani vs. Huaorani

I just moved the talk page from Talk:Huaorani to here, to agree with the (apparently undiscussed) move of the article itself. While Waodani is the more common term in evangelical circles, I believe that Huaorani is the preferred term in academic ones, and thus I don't agree with the page move. I'm willing to be convinced, however. Please give rationale for preferring Waodani over Huaorani. --Spangineer^ws (háblame) 15:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it should be renamed back to Huaorani. Google Scholar hit counts:

Huaorani: 1,100
Waorani: 627
Waodani: 18

I rest my case.Birdbrainscan (talk) 01:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just moved both the article and talk page back to Huaorani. --Spangineer^ws (háblame) 02:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Since you find more hits for Deutsch than for German, shouldn't you move the English wikipedia article on the German language to Deutsch? Huaorani is a Spanish spelling, Waodani/ Waorani is an English spelling. IMHO, Huaorani is fine for the Spanish wikipedia, but Waodani or Waorani would be more appropriate for the English wikipedia. Sigh...

BTW, in case someone says the native spelling should be used instead, that's waodãdi. Mcswell (talk) 03:13, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting—any ideas then why scholars like Laura Rival refer to them as the Huaorani in books written in English? --Spangineer^ws (háblame) 04:05, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actual name

The actual name for this people group is Waodani, not Huorani. --Tribe12 (talk) 16:27, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would the book written by Joe Kane called, 'Savages,' be a good reference? He lived with the Huaorani in 1996 for I believe three months. Mylittlezach (talk) 21:37, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of dancing tribe

It seems to me that the picture about the "Huaorani ceremony" is from other indigenous group. Huaorani do not dress with colorful straps neither do they paint their faces red. The body paint (i.e. tattoo-like patterns on thighs and arms) the folks in the picture are using is not usually seen in Huaorani people. Huaorani men never use such colorful bands around their waist; instead, they use a string of cotton to hold their penises. I recommend changing this picture to something more representative of their culture.Daimi (talk) 15:46, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recent radical changes

The article was completely re-written on June 15, 2010 by another editor. The new version A) is poorly referenced (once, for the whole articl), B) shows a narrow view of the subject, and C) removes a lot of detail that enriched the earlier article. Attempted restorations of the earlier version were turned back, possibly by the aforementioned user under different names. While this may represent vandalism, I would like to think that it is merely the work of an inexperienced and probably biased editor. While the version previous to the re-write wasn't perfect, it was clearly superior to what we have been left with. Unless someone has strong and reasonable objections, I will revert the article to an earlier version, perhaps making a few edits myself to try to improve it. If edit warring over the article continues, I will seek to have offending users blocked, or the page protected. DoctorEric (talk) 21:43, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and have reverted to that version. I hope interested parties can work to incorporate new material, but wholesale replacement without discussion was unwarranted. --Spangineer^ws (háblame) 22:44, 30 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Waorani people/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

* No photos, but good list of references and links

History starts since WWII, omits rubber era
Culture has clear worldview section, but other issues lacking depth or missing, no Eeme festival etc.
History has little discussion of interethnic relations with Quechua
Land rights before 1990, update?

Last edited at 00:53, 2 July 2011 (UTC). Substituted at 18:22, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Huaorani people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150303112652/http://endofthespear.com/ to http://www.endofthespear.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: ENGW3303 Adv Writing for Environmental Professions 12176

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 January 2022 and 30 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Giraffestar (article contribs).

Dubious

I just read Through Gates of Splendor, and it doesn't mention that the photographs were why the Waorani attacked the missionaries. This was the first edition, published shortly after Operation Auca, so it might have been determined since then that the photos were the reason, but someone more familiar with this topic should probably check. 184.21.204.5 (talk) 19:19, 25 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(I wrote the above comment) I have since read Jungle Pilot as well, and it also does not mention the photographs as the reason for the attacks. 206.204.236.102 (talk) 23:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]