Talk:W76

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

About This Stub

I know this is a stub but it is out of date. It has been determined that the pit at the core of the W76 will last nearly 100 years, so they don't have to be replaced any time soon and the Reliable Replacement Warhead (RRW) program is on the rocks as it is, so that is unlikely to be the replacement for it anytime soon anyway. 65.120.76.32 (talk) 20:19, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Article: How the US forgot how to make Trident missiles

You folks might want to check this out:

How the US forgot how to make Trident missiles

--Radical Mallard 3/12/09 7 PM EST

File:W76 warheads.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:W76 warheads.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests August 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Holbrook

Its's been suggested that the UK's Holbrook is a clone of this design. reliable sources on this are a problem mind.©Geni (talk) 23:40, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It should probably get a separate page.Kylesenior (talk) 04:43, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Holbrookm is mentioned in the trident page but should probably be mentioned here if we can find a solid source.©Geni (talk) 14:54, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sandia says britian using a W76 clone https://www.sandia.gov/news/publications/labs-accomplishments/article/2011/nuclear-weapons-engineering-3/ military balance says Holbrook is the name https://www.iiss.org/blogs/military-balance/2021/03/uk-nuclear-warheads-integrated-review

©Geni (talk) 23:09, 16 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]