Talk:Vienna Test System

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Software: Computing Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Disagreement regarding phrasing

I copy here a discussion from my talk page Pratat (talk) 08:03, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Vienna Test System—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 07:26, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Materialscientist, why do you think it was nonconstructive? "this saves both time and money in comparison to administrating and scoring paper-and-pencil tests manually" and "not only" reads very much like boasting about a specific software product..Pratat (talk) 07:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article creator...

...created this in 2017 (as translation of Wikipedia-German article) and has not edited any articles since then, so very unlikely that the one person who appears to be familiar with VTS will participate in any discussions here at Talk. David notMD (talk) 15:45, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]