Jump to content

Talk:Treaty of Kars

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Template

[edit]

When this page is unblocked, someone should add Template:First World War treaties to the article.--Methodius 11:48, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Annulment

[edit]

Sorry for heavily taging the section, but its lacking any sources. --VartanM 15:43, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, some research is needed in support of the claims. For example, such entity as Armenian oblast did not exist in the region as an administrative unit. The area in question was parts of Kars, Erivan and Tiflis governorates of Russian Empire. So I made corrections in this regard. 11:35, 7 October 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Atabek (talk • contribs)

stain's role

[edit]

i deleted this part because the given reference is ridiculous. some forum of armenians in russian language discussing Armenian Genocide. please, present more verifiable sources. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.162.152.28 (talk) 11:16, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Armenian forum gives the link to the original source. I change the source to the original one and undo the change.517design (talk) 14:15, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I checked your sources, couldn't find anything related to his "role" in this agreement too as

presented by Kazim Karabekir. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Torebay (talk • contribs) 20:57, 21 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The validity question

[edit]

I have added the validity question in the article on 25 January 2010. This is in accordance to the fact, that the treaty was signed by unauthorised representatives of the countries and territories in question, as described. The issue is long known in all the countries and the international scene.

I also added to the part of the recognition of the treaty by the Armenian side and the links as bases. It was direct opposite of what was written here. Aregakn (talk) 23:23 GMT 15/02/2010

I ask you for proper sources then, as the fact that this treaty has been accepted by the international community. Claiming this theory is void is something that I can't take your word for and thus I need sources. --Armanalp (talk) 21:17, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources? Sources of what? Sources of it being signed by the sides mentioned? Tell me what exact sources. And there is a way of asking references. It's putting a tag befor you delete it.Aregakn (talk) 23:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I've tagged the "The Questioned Validity of the Treaty" section, which is questionable and completely unreferenced. Such questionable assertions need a reference. --Kansas Bear (talk) 01:28, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Correct! And I added references and took the tag off.Aregakn (talk) 11:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted part of another article from lead section.

[edit]

Hello everyone,

As the part I deleted was quite large I thought I should explain myself here. Because the subject matter is probably contested.

The paragraph was, as can be seen in the page history, a large part of the Battle of Sardarabad article. I don't know how this treaty is related to that, but what I do know is that this large text can't just be copy-pasted. I can't judge on the text itself, I know very little about it. However this text should not be here. I've added a link to the article from which all the text comes to prevent that we lose information.

If you feel that this deletion was wrongfully carried out, please feel free to revert it. AlwaysUnite (talk) 22:39, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Was a controversial treaty"

[edit]

You're not supposed to tell the reader what to think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.123.248.133 (talk) 01:33, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have deleted the word "controversial". Tiptoethrutheminefield (talk) 15:01, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Treaty of Kars. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:49, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Treaty_of_Kars&oldid=1208356370"