Talk:The New Zealand Herald

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Auckland High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Political bias

The political bias of the herald is noted by its disclaimer of Matt McCarten's opinion piece as 'from the left' wheras on the opposite page former far right Act party MP Deborah Coddingtodn's opinion is labled as 'senior correspondent'

This anon edit may be a wee bit POV. Political bias in a newspaper should look at the paper as a whole. I have deleted the sentence (it also had bad spelling). Alan Liefting 08:54, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I used to be a news reporter at the Herald, and there was no deliberate political bias in the news reporting. At least, reporters weren't instructed to write their stories with a political bias. Of course, such is not the case in regards to the op-eds (opinion pieces and editorials). They tend to lean to the right, but of course the Herald also employs columnists such as Tapa Misu (sp?) to balance the likes of Garth George.

The general outlook of the editorial managers, including editor Tim Murphy, is right-of-centre, but I think this is just because the managers are generally older, mostly male, and managers. These three factors automatically make folks a little conservative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.5.253.175 (talk) 10:24, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Herald has slowly been becoming more conservative. Given that they just described tagging a National supporters house as 'hate-speech' (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=11926235) I think it's reasonably fair to describe the paper as having a conservative bias these days.

Moderate?

I haven't read the Herald's commentary pages for some time. I remember Gwynne Dyer, Robert Fisk, and Gordon McLachlen quite prominently featured eregularly - at least when I was still reading it. And it never printed commentary pieces touching on key issues that was from the British centre-right Daily Telegraph. --JNZ (talk) 23:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:NZ Herald.jpg

Image:NZ Herald.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 15:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editing mistake

The fact box wrongly said the Herald has a circulation of 500,000+. This is a mistake - the circulation is 194,000, as the article makes clear. I tried to change this but something went wrong and the statistic vanished. Sorry about that. Hopefully somebody can fix the stuff-up... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.5.253.175 (talk) 10:31, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed now. XLerate (talk) 12:55, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coat of Arms

I have added the newspaper's coat of arms which was granted in the late 1960s. Cheers. A1 Aardvark (talk) 23:00, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some proposed changes

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered.

Breakout Box | Changes Type: Daily Newspaper (Print and Digital) Editor: Murray Kirkness (weekday), Stuart Dye (weekends) Print circulation: 113,752

Print readership (daily): 442,000 Daily brand audience: 1.04 million Weekly brand audience: 1.66 million

Hayleygillespie (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply 01-OCT-2018

Unable to implement

New talk page messages are always placed at the bottom of the talk page.
Please provide references which verify the information you are attempting to add. When In the case of these figures, company provided references are acceptable. ready to proceed with the requested information, kindly change the edit request template's answer parameter to read from ans=yes to ans=no and be sure to place any references immediately below this post. Thank you! Spintendo 03:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

ans=no References Print circulation: 113,752 ^[1] Print readership (daily): 442,000 Daily brand audience: 1.04 million Weekly brand audience: 1.66 million ^[2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hayleygillespie (talk • contribs) 20:49, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ http://newspaper.abc.org.nz/audit.html?org=npa&publicationid=%25&mode=embargo&npa_admin=1&publicationtype=19&memberid=%25&type=%25
^ Nielsen Consumer and Media Insights, Readership Release Q3 17 to Q2 18 15+ Daily average = 442,000 NZH AIR (Mon-Fri)

Reply 01-OCT-2018

Y The average net circulation was updated.
N The print readership (daily) was not updated (unreferenced).
N The daily and weekly brand audience cannot be implemented because this parameter does not exist within the Newspaper infobox template.

Regards, Spintendo 04:34, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Page Changes

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. The requested edit is not formatted correctly. Please see the Reply section below for more information about this request.

Information for each section - header in bold- to be added or amended. Some current information is out of date or incorrect - Please see notes for detail.

Introduction For more than over 155 years, The New Zealand Herald has connected Kiwis to the nation, the world, and to what matters to them. The Herald is part of the fabric of New Zealand, growing from a daily newspaper to an award-winning website, mobile site and apps. The New Zealand Herald is a daily newspaper published in Auckland, New Zealand, owned by New Zealand Media and Entertainment. It has the largest newspaper circulation of all newspapers in New Zealand, peaking at over 200,000 copies in 2006, although circulation of the daily Herald had declined to 115,213 copies on average by December 2017. Currently it’s print editions connect with more than half a million New Zealanders daily.^[1] Its main circulation area is the Auckland region. It is also delivered to much of the north of the North Island including Northland, Waikato and King Country.[2][4] Audiences are engaging with the brand through print, web, social media and the NZ Herald app. The Herald was named the Best Daily News Brand in New Zealand, Australia and the Pacific at the 2018 News Media Awards.

Addition to History The Herald is now owned by New Zealand Media and Entertainment which was launched in 2014 as the formal merger of the New Zealand division of APN News & Media and The Radio Network.

Notable contributors The NZ Herald has a wide and diverse stable of columnists in news, business, sport, entertainment and lifestyle. Regular columnists in 2018 include Deborah Hill Cone, Rachel Stewart, Mike Hosking, Matt Heath, Liam Dann, Brian Gaynor, Fran O’Sullivan, Lizzie Marvelly, Matthew Hooton, Brian Rudman, Kate Hawkesby, Mary Holm, Gregor Paul, and Kerre McIvor.

Organisational Restructuring In December 2015, the NZ Herald moved to a new multi-purpose newsroom in central Auckland – co-shared with Newstalk ZB and Radio Sport. Journalists are now trained across all platforms.

Titles- The Weekend Herald The Weekend Herald is the best read newspaper in the country, and won back- to- back Newspaper of the Year and Best Weekly Newspaper awards at the 2018 and 2017 Voyager and Canon Media Awards.

Titles - Herald On Sunday It has been the number one read Sunday newspaper in New Zealand since 2015 and currently holds a 60% market share. ^[2] It is currently edited by Stuart DyeItalic text

Herald Online Website The newspaper's online news service,[22] originally called Herald Online, was established in 1998. It was redesigned in late 2006, and again in 2012 and again in 2016. The site was named best news website at the 2007 and 2008 Qantas Media Awards, won the "best re-designed website" category at the 2007 New Zealand NetGuide Awards, and was one of seven newspaper sites named an Official Honouree in the 2007 Webby Awards.[23]

An award- winning site, it was named Website of the Year at the Canon Media Awards in 2017 ^[3] and News Website of the Year at the Voyager Media Awards in 2018 ^[4]

In September 2018, at the News Media Awards in Sydney (previously known as the Panpa Awards), the NZ Herald was named Best Daily News Brand (print and digital) in Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific.

Editors and Columnists The New Zealand Herald: Murray Kirkness Weekend Herald: Stuart Dye Herald on Sunday: Stuart Dye Regular columnists Deborah Hill Cone, Rachel Stewart, Mike Hosking, Matt Heath, Liam Dann, Brian Gaynor, Fran O’Sullivan, Lizzie Marvelly, Matthew Hooton, Brian Rudman, Kate Hawkesby, Mary Holm, Gregor Paul.

Please remove Matt McCarten, Herald on Sunday Brian Rudman Colin James is a past columnist Peter de Graaf (journalist) travel editor located in Kerikeri Hayleygillespie (talk) 03:48, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ Source: Nielsen CMI Fused Q3 17 - Q2 18 Sept 2018 *AP15+
^ Source: Nielsen CMI Q3 2017 – Q2 2018. AP15+
^ https://voyagermediaawards.nz/winners-finalists/2017-winners/
^ https://voyagermediaawards.nz/2018-winners/

Reply 01-OCT-2018

Unable to review edit request
Your edit request could not be reviewed because the provided references are not formatted correctly. As submitted, it is unclear which references are connected to specific notes in the text of your proposal. When proposing edit requests, it is important to highlight in the text which specific sources are doing the referencing for each note. The point of an inline citation is to allow the reviewer and readers to check that the material is sourced; that point is lost if the citation is not clearly linked to the provided reference. Furthermore, the reference style used in the edit request does not resemble the style used by the article. General practice dictates that the style already in use for an article be the one that is subsequently used for all future additions unless changed by editorial consensus. (See WP:CITEVAR.) These issues are illustrated below:

N INCORRECT
The sun is pretty big,[8] but the moon is not so big.[13] The sun is also quite hot.^[2]

References

1.^{^}<ref>Source: Sjöblad, Tristan. ''The Sun''. Academic Press, 2018, p. 142.</ref>
2.^{^}<ref>http://www.newssitesource.com</ref>

In the example above there are notes placed next to the statements, a number 8, 13, and 2. Two of these are placed in brackets while the third is generated through the use of ref tags. When looking at these three numbers, it is unclear in all but one of them which of the two provided references link to them. The one reference note which is clearly linked is placed in ref tags. Your edit request similarly places numbered notes within brackets which are disbursed throughout the edit request, along with notes generated through the use of <ref> tags. ^[a] Edit requests ought to be formatted according to the citation style predominantly used by the article, in this case, Citation Style 1, as shown below.

Y CORRECT
The sun is pretty big,^[1] but the moon is not so big.^[2] The sun is also quite hot.^[3]

References

^ Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2018, p. 142.

^ Duvalier, Gabrielle. "Size of the Moon", Scientific American, 51(78):46.

^ Uemura, Shū. The Sun's Heat. Academic Press, 2018, p. 23.

In the example above, the link between the provided references and their notes is perfectly clear using Citation Style 1. Kindly reformulate your edit request so that it aligns more with the second example above, and feel free to submit that edit request at your earliest convenience. Regards, Spintendo 05:11, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notes

^ Citation Style 1 is the particular style that the article uses, not ref tags. If text from the article is copied and then pasted into the talk page, this will produce numbers within brackets which are unconnected to their main reference entries. Any requested edit of yours which may be implemented will need to resemble the current style already in use in the article – in this case, CS1 (See WP:CITEVAR). This would not normally be a problem in a request of a smaller size, whereas larger requests would be expected to have this formatting done before the request is submitted for review.

Online paywall (new! May 2019)

I clicked on an article just now and for the first time came up against a Murdoch/News Corp-style paywall ... “to continue reading... you can subscribe bla bla...” The article was also marked ‘Premium’. This was the first time that this had happened for me and I access the Herald online at least every few days. That the paper has moved to add a paywall to internet access should be in the article, but I don’t know enough about it, haven’t read enough about it to add anything myself. Boscaswell talk 20:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've added a line to the "Herald Online website" section, with a third-party reference.-gadfium 23:04, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://newspaper.abc.org.nz/audit.html?org=npa&publicationid=%25&mode=embargo&npa_admin=1&publicationtype=19&memberid=%25&type=%25

[2] Nielsen Consumer and Media Insights, Readership Release Q3 17 to Q2 18 15+ Daily average = 442,000 NZH AIR (Mon-Fri)

[3] Source: Nielsen CMI Fused Q3 17 - Q2 18 Sept 2018 *AP15+

[4] Source: Nielsen CMI Q3 2017 – Q2 2018. AP15+

[5] ttps://voyagermediaawards.nz/winners-finalists/2017-winners/

[6] ttps://voyagermediaawards.nz/2018-winners/

[noteFoot01a] Sjöblad, Tristan. The Sun. Academic Press, 2018, p. 142.

[noteFoot02a] Duvalier, Gabrielle. "Size of the Moon", Scientific American, 51(78):46.

[noteFoot03a] Uemura, Shū. The Sun's Heat. Academic Press, 2018, p. 23.

[7] Citation Style 1 is the particular style that the article uses, not ref tags. If text from the article is copied and then pasted into the talk page, this will produce numbers within brackets which are unconnected to their main reference entries. Any requested edit of yours which may be implemented will need to resemble the current style already in use in the article – in this case, CS1 (See WP:CITEVAR). This would not normally be a problem in a request of a smaller size, whereas larger requests would be expected to have this formatting done before the request is submitted for review.

[1]

[2]

[1]

[2]

[3]

[4]

[a]

[1]

[2]

[3]