Talk:The Day the Clown Cried

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the War films task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Book

Should there not be information added to this article or a seperate article about the book? -- mjohnson 20/02/06

Unfinished films

Is the "Unfinished films" category really accurate? The article gives the impression that the movie was finished, but it was never released due to disputes between the original screenwriters and director Jerry Lewis. (Sugar Bear 14:43, 14 July 2006 (UTC))[reply]

The shooting was finished, but not the editing. There's only a rough cut for screening purposes; the released version would have been edited differently. Also, there's no music or credits. —Chowbok ☠ 22:34, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removed from Trivia

This:

An episode of Batman: The Animated Series, "The Man Who Killed Batman", makes a slight reference to the film. When Batman is believed to have been deceased, The Joker holds a funeral and starts the eulogy with "Dear friends, today is the day the clown cried...."24.85.227.237 06:37, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BBC television broadcast?

A correspondent to the Simon Mayo radio show on BBC Radio 5 Live on Friday 12 September 2008 indicated that he had seen The Day The Clown Died a few years previously late at night on BBC television. Can anyone confirm this? Was this a extract or a full broadcast? Or just a false memory? Jamesbrownontheroad (talk) 18:51, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Basics

This article contains virtually no in-line citations and many unsourced/unattributed claims, opinions and quotes. 76.23.157.102 (talk) 04:37, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So why not pitch in and help convert the older style references very common in older articles to the newer, inline cites we now use? If you have the knowledge and the time, you'd be doing the article and readers a big favor. Sadly, I don't have the expertise on this subject. I'll mark it for my watch pages though and try and come back to it with some references. I'll try if you'll try! OK? LiPollis (talk)

Animaniacs

The short "Hearts of Twilight" sould at least get a mention.

05:10, 15 October 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paula Bunion (talk • contribs)

unsafe link?

The link in this article mondo-video.com may be dangerous according to Firefox plugin WOT: 06/08/2012 Google Visiting this site may harm your computer according to Google Safe Browsing. [link] 06/08/2012 Yandex Blacklisted by Yandex Safe Browsing for malware. [link] 79.110.95.2 (talk) 11:48, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up. Better to be safe: I've removed the actual link but left in the site name. Caveat surfer. --Seduisant (talk) 14:58, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The statements needing citations...

I think it's close to time to delete some of the statements still needing citations unless someone's going to find some. The reasons they won't or can't release the film have become urban legends themselves and other subsequent claims about where/how the tapes are stored etc. vary and shouldn't be mentioned in the article without reliable citations. I came here to learn about the film, but have found it to be unreliable information after referencing other sources. I'll leave it to keepers of the article to fix Dancindazed (talk) 06:48, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on The Day the Clown Cried. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120213113120/http://www.filmvault.com/filmvault/nash/l/lifeisbeautiful1.html to http://www.filmvault.com/filmvault/nash/l/lifeisbeautiful1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:31, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

How is there a 'full plot' when the film hasn't been released, or seen ANYWHERE?

????? Did someone make one up? Find a script? Work in the archival room and sneak it on and write exclusive plot on Wikipedia? If there is a time for a reference for a plot, it is now, with this unreleased movie. Charlr6 (talk) 01:26, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quite a few people have seen it over the years, but since it's not generally available, the plot summary is unverifiable. Citations are needed for that section. Jonathunder (talk) 01:33, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this ....

It is based on a script of the same name[1] by Joan O'Brien, who had co-written the original script with Charles Denton ten years previously.[2]  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.93.233.246 (talk) 05:27, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on The Day the Clown Cried. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:14, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

biased tenor of this page and deleted addition of content

the main body of this page is biased against Lewis and his participation in this project. when i added content from verifiied sources (articles and quotes from youtube interviews) the content was deleted and i was told it was ‘vandalism’. our responsiblity is to present the full amount of evidence in an unbiased way. it is perfectly allowed to present information in support of the film, and more importantly Lewis’ own words on the subject rather than a third party, seem an obvious need. further, the use of outsize quotes, again seeminly to mock Lewis, make it appear the quotes have outsize importance to the content of the article. Anarchistemma (talk) 15:11, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A YT interwvie is not a good source. Also we can't support or not support the film. If you can find quotes from a RELIABLE source, then add them, but don't remove quotes that put the movie in a bad light. Lakeside Out!-LakesideMiners^{Click Here To Talk To Me!} 15:55, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

according to wikipedia accepted sources guidelines “audio, video, and multimedia materials that have been recorded then broadcast, distributed, or archived by a reputable party may also meet the necessary criteria to be considered reliable sources. Like text sources, media sources must be produced by a reliable third party and be properly cited.”. the documentary company that provided this video are credible and Lewis’ first person testimony are certainly pertinent to the film. I did not remove the quotes. i put them as in-line quotes in keeping with the rest of article. their original formatting, which calls them to particular attention, is presented to ridicule Lewis and the film. Anarchistemma (talk) 14:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lewis haters

this page has been created to mock and denegrate Lewis personally, and specifically for this project. based on the many discussion subjects on the talk page relating to unsourced statements, unverified information and lack of concrete subject matter, i am not the only one with this opinion. my attempt to add unbiased content was met with threats and bullying. i will add the content again and if it is deleted i will take the matter up with third party arbitration. Anarchistemma (talk) 15:32, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

?2600:4040:475E:F600:78C3:25C3:412:9A5F (talk) 00:20, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To Be released, or not to be...

In the video "The Most Infamous Unreleased Film Might Be Screened in 2024", it says at 19:02 that the NYT said it might be released; but at 19:56 it says the NYT told IndieWire that it's not happening and that they don't have the film. (Is this a correction to the article which has the former but not the latter?)

As one commenter said "What good is the original script anyway if they never got it made?"

How about someone (with permission) release ALL the footage, and see if ANYone can make it gold (or silver, or bronze)?

And—Oh!–where is that cut that was supposedly made of the film that Lewis supposedly kept?

But if the film stock has deteriorated too much by now (or was of low-grade quality to begin with?), then one might suppose that it's moot, anyway.

If the O'Brien family is still holding out after a half century, the question is Why??

Misty MH (talk) 12:10, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]