Talk:Teaching Philosophy

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Teaching Philosophy article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Academic Journals

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

Philosophy Low‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recent edits

A number of recent edits have restored content/formatting that I had removed. I will remove most of that again, but to make clear why I do this, I will do it incrementally and explain each edit in the edit summary. If somebody wants to revert this again, then please give a reason for the reversions. Thanks. --Crusio (talk) 08:51, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you very much for making this clear. We are orienting these pages on what we find elsewhere in Wikipedia from journal publishers. We want to cooperate with efforts to use best practices to make them more useful. Gleaman (talk) 17:28, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! I indeed noticed that you have considerably improved your articles over the last couple of days. There are (unfortunately) still many articles on journals on WP that are not very good and that you should better not use as an example. One that is pretty neat (I'm praising myself here, although I got a lot of help in editing that article from DGG and Headbomb) is Genes, Brain and Behavior, which shows what one can do with a journal for which a few (albeit not very many) sources exist. --Crusio (talk) 17:48, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]