Talk:Synergy

Business Top‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Engineering High‑importance

	Engineering portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Systems High‑importance

	Systems science portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Systems, which collaborates on articles related to systems and systems science.SystemsWikipedia:WikiProject SystemsTemplate:WikiProject SystemsSystems articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the field of Systems engineering.

Archives

1

This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Removing tags, blank edit summaries

When you are ready to behave professionally, let me know and I'll unprotect the page. I have no special connection to this article, but removing the tags without an explanation is disruptive. El_C 04:25, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, please consider registering an account instead of, confusingly, hopping from IP to IP. El_C 04:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry to stop attempting to put some logic into the squabble between religious concepts, art, charlatanry a pinch of science that passes as an entry for Synergy in Wikipedia. The editor has clearly no knowledge nor interest about the subject (he wrote me so) and just applies lazily archaic dogmatic rules without regard to logic, clarity and relevance. I am ashamed to have recommended in innumerable occasion students to check Wikipedia without being aware that many article are badly edited, contain misleading information and rather subtract from the knowledge of the reader. Cheers MercuryTest (talk) 20:48, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This response comes after several attempts to improve the section on synergy that were deleted without any explanations MercuryTest (talk) 20:52, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this message is for me, I will try to edit with my login MercuryTest. Sorry if I have coused disruptions. I am new to editing wiki. But the article on synergy is totally biased towards religious cristian fundamentalism promoted by Peter Crorning and I try to provide more scientific alternative views 201.208.118.204 (talk) 12:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Synergy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:13, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Final Fantasy mention

I do not see any merit in the mentioning of "Synergists" in the Final Fantasy game. The description offers no indication that these characters have anything to do with the concept of synergy. I propose to remove it. I was going to edit but this is still semi-protected at the moment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Technokratisch (talk • contribs) 12:33, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign all your talk page messages with four tildes (~~~~) — See Help:Using talk pages. Thanks.

Yes, by all means be wp:BOLD and remove it, mentioning the lack of sourcing and referring to the talk page in the edit summary. They can always put it back with a proper source. - DVdm (talk) 13:31, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah yes, semi-protected.

Done: [1]. - DVdm (talk) 13:37, 27 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Synergy in relationship of all kinds of energy...

Thermal Energy, Dark Energy, Kinetic Energy to work together as synergy of energy, what's this? 112.201.11.90 (talk) 13:56, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Creating the section that describes the misuse of the term in pseudoscience

The word "synergy" is frequiently used by occultists and otherwise pseudoscientific people to further their ideals. Heck, there are literally examples of destructive edits to this page that warranted banning users over adding their occult and esoteric meanings of "synergy". Personally, that's all I associate the word "synergy" with.

I think perhaps the article could be richer if it touches on how the word "synergy" is frequently used as a buzzword. Thoughts? Eliora39770 (talk) 17:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]