Jump to content

Talk:Sumter, South Carolina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wateree River

[edit]

I wonder about the relevence of all this talk about settlers on the Watteree River. Sumter isn't on the Wateree. How are colonists there relevent? 155.213.224.59 (talk) 14:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Crime

[edit]

The crime statistics are eight years old. Is it sill such a dangerous place? Is it even more dangerous? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.149.100.10 (talk) 20:52, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So the statistics seem to be six years old but I don't see what they add to the article or what the reference to its crime rate 13 years ago does. It would see if it went through a dangerous period that would fit better in the general history section. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.237.114.109 (talk) 05:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Crime stats are standard, especially for locations that hit the top 10 per capita list(s). I removed the old data and updated to 2018, the last available stats. Hope that helps. GenQuest "scribble" 08:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, removed the entire "Crime" sub-section and replaced it with a graphic summary box. GenQuest "scribble" 18:51, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Third Army --> ARCENT

[edit]

There were several references to Third Army but I changed them all to United States Army Central. Third Army doesn't exist any more. 155.213.224.59 (talk) 16:12, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Crime 2

[edit]

It appears the crime stats have been updated since the comment above. the most recent stats are here. https://www.statista.com/statistics/433603/us-metropolitan-areas-with-the-highest-violent-crime-rate/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 170.149.100.113 (talk) 04:28, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinate error

[edit]

{{geodata-check}}

The following coordinate fixes are needed for


2600:1700:F2D0:5640:8856:B567:EEF1:635A (talk) 15:46, 11 June 2023 (UTC) Your Right on top of them[reply]

You haven't said what you think is wrong with the coordinates in the article. I've tweaked them a bit to match the GNIS entry, but if you still think that there is an error, you'll need to supply a clear explanation of what it is. Deor (talk) 16:59, 11 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]