Talk:Strasbourg

And not a word about their language, ethnicity

Amazing that not a word is spared on the ethnicity of the people, their language, their allegiance, or anything remotely threatening to the French overloards of the city and the provincd of Alsace. Well done Wiki, well done.... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:7000:9900:5B67:4464:FBF2:FEB3:33A2 (talk) 00:21, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Expansion and translation

There's been tag on the article for a year now, asking for information to be included from the fr.wiki article. This is almost certainly a good idea, as the fr.wiki article is unsurprisingly much more comprehensive - but which parts in particular would editors like to seen brought over? Knepflerle (talk) 13:58, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Economy and social structure, in particular. But the history section could still be expanded a lot more. --RCS (talk) 14:30, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

--Uhh, it notes in the text that King Phillip of Swabia granted the city of Strassbourg the status of Imperial Free City in 1262, but on the King Phillip of Swabia page it notes that he died in 1208. Since he would have been dead for 54 years by the time he granted Strassbourg that status, it seems unlikely that he was responsible. Voxexmachina (talk) 05:00, 8 February 2010 (UTC)

Uhh! Funny what? This is but one of hundreds of times that extant printed pages or handwritten pages of information conflict with our existing chronology! Since this is but one of hundreds, just how is it now explained?96.19.156.227 (talk) 20:41, 14 June 2011 (UTC)Ronald L. Hughes

Xavier Leroux

According to the WP article, Leroux was born in Italy, not Strasbourg. Does anyone know any more than I do about this? LynwoodF. 213.48.46.141 (talk) 11:12, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Since no one has come up with a justification for the unsubstantiated assertion, I have undone the relevant edit. LynwoodF (talk) 15:23, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Etymology

An anonymous edit without an edit summary was claiming a Greek origin for the element -bourg or -burg. It is certainly cognate with English borough and may well also be cognate with a similar Greek word, but I have no evidence that it is derived from Greek. I have undone what is no doubt a good-faith, but naïve edit. LynwoodF (talk) 19:27, 17 November 2011 (UTC)

Discussion moved to User talk:LynwoodF

Hey LynwoodF, I will try to help you on the matter, the etymologists are still arguing whether the word has Latin or Germanic roots. If fact the word Burgus was used by germanics and Latino roughly with the same pronunciation to designated in both case a castle, or "place forte". The word really started to spread out with the Franks (Charlemagne) and the use of old French especially with the song of Roland that was one of the first song written in old French and that spread quickly in whole Europe . Is at this time that the word started to spread and some new signification appeared like Bourgeois ( the man from the Bourg/burg) and that numerous towns in Germany and France stated to bear the word Bourg in the name of the town ( Cherbourg, Lanslebourg, Bourg en Bresse, Strasbourg, Lauterbourg Cabourg, Luxembourg, Lunenburg, Hamburg etc.... Anyway, still now scientists are still arguing its possible origin, but it seems attested that the Roland song was really on the point to spread the word thoughout western and mittel Europa. I guess the word " borough" might be an "anglicisation" of the term.... Another mystery to resolve https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bourg if you can read French --Gabriel Haute Maurienne (talk) 00:09, 19 June 2015 (UTC) Hello, ‎Gabriel Haute Maurienne. The point I was making three or four years ago was that someone had naïvely added the words "from Greek πύργος" to the etymology. Now the element "burg" and its variants exist in a wide range of Germanic languages and there is no reason to suppose that they got there from Greek. Looking at this from a neutral point of view – I am English-born, but lived for some years in France and have studied Romance linguistics – I am inclined to the view that you have been reading some rather francocentric etymologists. I see no evidence of "burgus" in Classical Latin and it seems most likely that it got into Late Latin as a result of the Germanic migrations of the fifth century. The word exists in Old English as "burg" or "burh" and occurs as an element in numerous place names. For example, the name of the city of Salisbury in Wiltshire is attested over 100 years before the Song of Roland is thought to have been composed and even longer before its widespread popularity. The spelling "borough" is rather fanciful. We actually say /bʌrə/. The origin of the name of Strasbourg is clearly Germanic. The city was very much a part of Germany throughout the Middle Ages and became part of France in 1681. Since then it has changed hands several times and when I lived there about 55 years ago the principal language of the city was Alsatian, an Allemanic variety of Upper German. Since then French has taken over almost completely. I have seen something similar happening with Brussels during my lifetime. It is still officially bilingual, but has become overwhelmingly French-speaking. Years ago we used to reckon it was approx. 80% French-speaking and 20% Dutch-speaking. ("Flemish" is just the Belgian name for Dutch – in both Belgium and the Netherlands it is officially called "Nederlands".) LynwoodF (talk) 11:16, 19 June 2015 (UTC) Hi LynwoodF, this is really disappointing. I just sum up some info trying to talk about the origin of the terminology of Bourg/burg. I never made a comment about Strabourg precisely. Furthermore I never said that the word was French, even more surprising, I never talked about Stasbourg as having French name origin. I recall giving city names from France and Germany like Lunenburg or Hamburg to illustrate the spread on the use in both countries. I never stated from which side it definitely came from. I just said that it is probably during the Charlemagne era that the terminology spread (and as far as I'm concerned, back then France nor Germany didn't exist), I never said neither that it was the starting point to the word, and that cities would start to adopt the term all of a sudden (the Roland Song mentioned the term so, it existed prior of the song, I took this fact for obvious.).... I said or I meant if you prefer, that it was one of the first time that the term was specified, and the notoriety of this song was probably a vector to increase the spread. What the heck the French speaking evolution of Bruxelles is related to the origin and use on Bourg/burg? I end my edit saying that the mystery is still to find. And for the history of Alsace (since you open your comment by your place of origin), being Alsatian by my mother, and my family being traced back to the 13th century around Surbourg, I really don't need a refresh of the history of the region. And for your comment about Strabourg being part of "Germany" during the middle age, I'm sure that you are aware that it is a little bit more complex (eg the proclamation in Versailles in 1871). Furthermore during the middle age, the Holy Roman Empire, was spread up to some parts of Italy, Savoie, Burgundy, eastern Belgium and many region in Central Europe. So it is not as simple as you say. But I'm surprised, at first I candidly thought that the question was just about a discussion about the origin of the terminology Bourg/burg. But thank you for your "neutral point of view"--Gabriel Haute Maurienne (talk) 12:53, 21 June 2015 (UTC) Le plus surprenant en regardant ton profil c'est que tu es probablement francophile (on n'apprend pas le francais, et on n'affiche pas les armoiries du Dauphiné par hasard). Aussi j'imagine que ma contribution à été perdue dans la traduction. Mon intervention était liée uniquement au mot bourg, sans lien direct avec la ville dont est liée la page de discussion. Bonne continuation --Gabriel Haute Maurienne (talk) 13:06, 21 June 2015 (UTC) Hello again, Gabriel Haute Maurienne. I am sorry if I misunderstood your previous post. I was originally commenting specifically on the element "-bourg" in the name of the city of Strasbourg. It seemed naïve to attribute a Greek origin to this when the element was so widespread in Germanic languages. When I used the expression "part of Germany", I meant that it was in that part of the Holy Roman Empire which was known as the Kingdom of Germany and in the area which was linguistically and culturally German. I looked at the article in French WP about the word "bourg" and I see that the Greek origin theory is not widely held, although I would be happy with the notion that the Greek word could be cognate with the Germanic word. As for Brussels, I merely mentioned it in passing, because during my lifetime I have seen an advance in the use of French in both Strasbourg and Brussels. French is continuing to expand, just as English is advancing in parts of the British Isles where it was very much a second language until relatively recently. However, in recent decades the minority languages in the UK have been fighting to avoid extinction. I would not describe myself specifically as a Francophile. I have lived in England, Scotland and France and have travelled widely in the Low Countries and elsewhere in Europe. Over the years I have discovered that, despite superficial differences, people are very much the same. LynwoodF (talk) 14:55, 21 June 2015 (UTC) Re LynwoodF étant donné que cette partie de la discussion n'est pas liée à l'article, permet moi de te répondre en francais puisque tu le maîtrise sans doute mieux que moi l'anglais. Pour l'origine grecque, je pense, mais je n'ai pas de certitude ni de source, que c'est probablement lié à la version qui soutient l'origine latine du terme. Partant de là, il est techniquement possible d'arguer de la réflexion suivante: étant donné que de nombreux mots latins viennent du grec, il est probable que bourg en provienne également toujours selon cette théorie. A croire les hellénophones, toutes les langues viennent du grec 😜. Enfin pour le déclin de certaines langues régionales frontalières, si beaucoup ne faisait pas le raccourci entre racine du dialecte parlé = nationalité je suis sûr que leur statut se porterait bien mieux. Ce n'est pas un hasard si de nombreux dialectes germaniques ont drastiquement régressé après les deux guerres mondiales, ou certains ont justifié leurs annexions territoriale unilatérales forcées sur ce simple critère. Enfin si tu jettes un œil sur les deux discussions que j'ai en ce moment, tu constateras que certains semblent mélanger réalité et fantasmes de grandeurs, quitte à inventer des sources qui s'autoalimentent. Amicalement --Gabriel Haute Maurienne (talk) 15:27, 21 June 2015 (UTC) Hello again, Gabriel Haute Maurienne. You are welcome to address me in French. I still read it easily, but since I gave up travelling for health reasons, I find it harder to compose text in French, especially as I do not have a suitable keyboard. I have lost a lot of vocabulary and find myself making grammatical mistakes I would not have made 30 years ago. As you suggested, I looked at your talk page on French WP and I see that you have an anonymous correspondent with a tendency to be unreasonable. You have my sympathy. I have had encounters with people who do not wish to be persuaded. There was a reason for putting the arms of the Dauphin on my user page. Two television historians (who should have been more careful) independently described the future Louis VIII as "the Dauphin". You probably know that he was once proclaimed King of England, a fact which was not taught to us when I was at school. Given that you come from nearby, I expect you know that at the time when Louis lived, the Dauphiné was still effectively an independent state within the Kingdom of Arles, which was part of the Holy Roman Empire. I was similarly irritated when a historian speaking on the radio read an extract from a 14th-century chronicle which described a man as coming from "Hainaut in Germany", and then unwisely commented, "So they got that wrong." The chronicler was in fact precisely right. Best wishes, LynwoodF (talk) 11:59, 22 June 2015 (UTC) En effet LynwoodF, le plus dur est souvent de trouver des interlocuteurs raisonnables qui veulent bien échanger. J'ai eu de grosses envolées également sur l'article sur la langue Allemande sur la page de discussion anglaise. Ou il semble qu'une collection de drapeau de pays est plus important que la réalité. Par exemple insister pour faire figurer la slovaquie dans l'info box alors que le nombre total de locuteurs reconnus, concernent deux municipalités avec 89 locuteurs de langue allemande en totalité (communes à facilité), à un moment figurait également Togo et Cameroun (aussi je me surprend à me demander si tout cela ne contient pas une part de nostalgie). Plus dérangeant, voir totalement contraires aux règles éthiques, faire figurer en source .. wikipedia pour un article sur le nombre de germanophones dans une région du Brésil. Et pour conforter le tout on insère comme seconde référence une simple demande de création d'ISO qui pour justifier du nombre de locuteurs mentionne à son tour Wikipedia. Aussi il est très important de faire attention aux références, les lires et de ne pas prendre Wikipedia pour une source d'information infaillible. Et pour faire une dernière aparté sur l'Alsace, nous sommes et nous nous sentons français, nous avons combattu pour la révolution française, Mulhouse a voté librement son rattachement à la France, la région à donné nos meilleurs généraux pour la France (Kellermann, Kléber et tant d'autres) nous avons protesté contre l'annexion de l'Allemagne en 1871 (https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Député_protestataire), l'affaire de Saverne https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incident_de_Saverne, et bien sur l'annexion et l'incorporation forcée dans l'armée nazi. On a du "s'engager", avec menace de mort sur la famille en cas de refus, et fini exterminé sur le front de l'est pour un pays, et une guerre qui n'était pas la notre. Marcel Weinum a 16 ans a créé le premier réseau de résistance en Alsace, il a fini décapité a 18 ans à Stuttgart. Et bien souvent on se heurte aux raccourcis presque raciste assimilant dialectes germaniques à la nationalité allemande. Nous sommes fiers d'être français (ça peut surprendre dans ces temps de francophobie internationale) et c'est fatiguant de toujours avoir à se justifier ma grand mère a toujours porté la cocarde tricolore sur son habit traditionnel et s'est fait enterrée avec. Sinon pour le Dauphiné c'est effectivement proche de ma région, mais comme tu le sais, la Savoie a été un duché indépendant jusqu'à son annexion en 1860, aussi nous n'avions pas de liens étroit avec le Dauphiné, nous étions tourné vers l'Autriche, et la Bavière.la France en ce temps là était probablement notre plus grand ennemi. Et sinon tu vis ou maintenant??--Gabriel Haute Maurienne (talk) 13:30, 22 June 2015 (UTC)

Timeline of Strasbourg

What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content! Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 09:01, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Strasbourg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20081016001550/http://www.dresden.de:80/en/02/11/c_03.php to http://www.dresden.de/en/02/11/c_03.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:00, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

River navigation

There has been a difference of opinion today about the use of this term. Here is my contribution to the discussion:

"River navigation" is the normal expression in English for what is being discussed. It is perfectly normal in English to use a noun as though it were an adjective in order to modify a following noun. An expression which immediately leapt into my mind was "cliff path". There are plenty more, e.g. "cotton socks".

"Fluvial" is used in English chiefly in geological expressions. See The Oxford Dictionary of English.

LynwoodF (talk) 14:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi LynwoodF, thanks for sharing your view in the talk page instead of reverting. It seems that I was wrong, (and you were right), you are welcome to cancel my edit. Sorry, but being native French speaker, I was misleaded by the word. Sorry for the inconvenience.--Gabriel HM (talk) 15:38, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Hello, Gabriel HM. Thank you for your reply. I see that the wording has been changed again. LynwoodF (talk) 16:33, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Does the Ill flow into the Rhine in Strasbourg

The geography section of the article starts:

Strasbourg is on the Eastern border of France, on the Ill River where it flows into the Rhine on the border with Germany, across from the German town Kehl.

My first reaction was to say that is wrong, on the grounds that Ill continues to flow north parallel to the Rhine for c.20km before the two rivers actually meet. But then I began to doubt. Certainly that is what modern maps show, but they also show several waterways linking the two rivers in Strasbourg. Those waterways have canal names, and look like canals, but appearances and names can be deceptive, and it wouldn't be the first time a natural watercourse had been obliterated by its conversion into a much wider and straighter canal.

So I guess my question is, before people started digging extra channels, was there a natural connection between the Ill and the Rhine in Strasbourg, or is the only natural channel of the Ill the one that continues down to Offendorf before entering the Rhine. Either way, I think we need to elaborate that sentence, but best to know the facts (and pick up a cite or two) first. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 16:41, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Here is a very technical and extensive article from 1919, in French, on the subject. It deals with how in the late 19th-century and early 20th-century Strasbourg created a new port along canals that were specially dug to connect the Ill and the Rhine, whose natural flow had been modified by the Germans. I hope this helps... --Edelseider (talk) 19:13, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

And here you can see that the little stream Steingiessen (length: 4.4 km, according to ), which runs through the Strasbourg district of La Robertsau, does indeed connect the Ill and the Rhine through natural means. --Edelseider (talk) 20:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

Remind

Just a remind. Some important naming conventions which the article's lead violates (WP:LEAD#General guidelines and WP:LEAD#Separate section usage): Once a Names or Etymology section or paragraph is created, the alternative English or foreign names should not be moved back to the first line. As an exception, a local official name different from a widely accepted English name should be retained in the lead. (Foreign language: Local name; known also by several alternative names)".' If the case is exceptional, common sense may be applied to ignore all rules. Please discuss to decide if this is an exceptional case.2A02:2430:3:2500:0:0:B807:3DA0 (talk) 03:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

I don't think this is an issue. The very purpose of an article lead is to summarise the important bits of the following article. And Strasbourg's location on both national and linguistic boundaries is absolutely crucial to any understanding of its story. It would be perverse not to include this in the lead just because of a bit of WP bureaucracy that was clearly intended to discourage inclusion of non-crucial information in the lead. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 12:00, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

BTW perversion means something else, is the comment above something like trolling?2A02:2430:3:2500:0:0:B807:3DA0 (talk) 19:32, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Anonymous users lecturing non-anonymous users cannot be taken seriously. Take an user name like everybody else or stop playing the Wikipedia policeman. --Edelseider (talk) 20:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

To my mind, rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of the wise. In my experience, Chris j wood and Edelseider have both done good work on articles connected with Strasbourg and, if they are both happy with the lead, I can tell you all that I am reasonably happy with it too. LynwoodF (talk) 21:47, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you LynwoodF. You certainly speak and act wisely! --Edelseider (talk) 09:44, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Just for the record, perverse in this context means "determined or disposed to go counter to what is expected or desired". No trolling involved. -- chris_j_wood (talk) 10:57, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

Armenians in Strasbourg

I made a small mistake with this edit: the author is Noëlla Richard, not Richard Noëlla. See also https://publication-theses.unistra.fr/public/memoires/2012/IEP/2012_RICHARD_Noella.pdf for the full text. --Edelseider (talk) 14:35, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Thank you, Edelseider. I was suspicious about the 30,000, and so I put a tag on the edit, but I thought you would know more about it than I do. I lived in Strasbourg over 50 years ago and things have changed a bit since then! I had a look at the pdf and found it interesting. LynwoodF (talk) 16:16, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

War edit with the German based IP 78.55.50.76

The user keep changing the sentence that was the fruit of a consensus. It is not accurate to state that the region was historically German speaking, since, many Germanic/alemanic languages and to to some extend romances dialects were initially spoken and are still spoken in the area. I tried to change it in many way (Germanic/alemanic) in order to reach a consensus, but he keeps reverting it to his initial edit. And finally attack me on my talk page saying that I'm an anti German person. I want to be clear by saying that the statement that he wants to change was here long before his intervention. And I just tried to keep it this way, I'm not the initiator of this war edit. I invited him many times to settle this issue on the talk page and he refused, preferring personal attacks on my talk page. I insist here by saying that the statement "historically German speaking" is not accurate since the standard German came in the region late and that most of the natives still now are speaking a Germanic dialect at home wich is different from the standard German. It is not correct to reduce the importance, the varieties and the cultural wealth of the different local dialects to the standard German. This German based IP contributor is new to wiki, and he is focused to add the word German, or a German translation of Alsatian names even in articles where a German translation is not relevant. This is not in the charter of Wikipedia to make personal attacks when we have a different on an article. He keeps saying that I should bring sources, eventhough and doesn't have any to sustain his affirmations.--Gabriel HM (talk) 14:54, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hello, Gabriel HM. I have seen some of this dispute going on in various places and I just wanted you to know that I understand what you are saying. We do not seem to know who this IP user is, but he (I definitely think it is a man.) has a poor understanding of historical linguistics and I suspect he has a political agenda. I am sure you know as well as I do the subtleties of the evolving linguistic situation in Alsace. When I lived in Strasbourg more than half a century ago, the default language in many areas of life was Alsatian, which was regarded as a regional language distinct from, although related to, German. As a neutral linguist with no axe to grind, I would regard it as a series of varieties of Alemannic German with an admixture of Gallicisms. Incidentally, the word Francization is regarded in British English as a specifically Canadian term. LynwoodF (talk) 17:09, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Lynwood, thanks for you kind comment. I think that I know who is this IP. Furthermore I suspect this anonymous users to be in fact Renekm specialised in former German Territorites and its German name mostly during the nazi era, and that spends most of his time to give German names to all territories, cities, communes, provinces, forts etc [1] without any distinction, and even naming French maginot forts with a German translation, wich is very weird [2]. Indeed his last post under his name was just before I reverted his edit, and in the following hours he disappeared from Wikipedia, and the anonymous IP appeared and started to to do the same. It is shameful for lnguit and the wealth of the dialects and regional languages to truly to reduce them as nothing than the main standard form.

"Historically" means "in the past" and not the current situation. Historic developments should be adressed as such. The university of Strasburg e.g. was teaching in German until the revolution and not in Alsatian. There is a difference when speaking about the distant past. --78.55.50.76 (talk) 17:56, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Section 1918 to the present

The beginning of the section "1918 to the present" should be reworked. It was apparently written by someone with the aim of downplaying support for France in Strasbourg in 1918. Several points appear dubious or are missing:

• unverifiable parallel history: "It is doubtful whether a referendum in Strasbourg would have ended in France's favour"
• a link to the map of German Reichstag election results in 1912, without explaining the context of that election (in 1912, 41 years after annexation, decline of the autonomist vote everywhere in Alsace, not just Strasbourg, one year before the Saverne Affair which rekindled it, and 2 years before a war nobody in Alsace could have imagined in 1912)
• no mention of the brutal policies of the German Army during WW1 (martial law imposed on the local inhabitants, bad treatment of their conscripts sent to the Eastern front for fear they would desert to the French, etc) which combined with the Saverne Affair greatly antagonized the Alsatians and changed their feelings toward Germany
• no mention of the huge crowds of cheering Strasbourgeois who welcomed the arrival of the French troops in November 1918, and the pro-French fervor which so impressed the American correspondents

ព្រះមហាក្សត្ររាជ (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Strasbourg. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101204060533/http://www.ceaac.org/html/espace_public/pourtales/frame.htm to http://www.ceaac.org/html/espace_public/pourtales/frame.htm
• Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160516192907/http://ccfr.bnf.fr/portailccfr/servlet/ViewManager?menu=menu_view&record=rnbcd_fonds:FONDS:853&setCache=rnbcd_fonds.FONDS to http://ccfr.bnf.fr/portailccfr/servlet/ViewManager?menu=menu_view&record=rnbcd_fonds%3AFONDS%3A853&setCache=rnbcd_fonds.FONDS
• Added archive http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20160518062629/http://www.alsace.equipement.gouv.fr/pdf/GCO-DUP-Doc_Publ.pdf to http://www.alsace.equipement.gouv.fr/pdf/GCO-DUP-Doc_Publ.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101002090459/http://www.leicester.gov.uk/your-council-services/lc/twinning/ to http://www.leicester.gov.uk/your-council-services/lc/twinning/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:30, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Salzburg disambiguation

Is this a joke? Do we really expect people to confuse Strasbourg and Salzburg?

I tried to remove it but got a bunch of crazy template warnings in the preview. Can someone who knows how to do it please remove this absolutely nonsensical disambiguation? --91.34.39.52 (talk) 21:54, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

You are right. It was a joke, or vandalism, which is the same, eventually. Thank you for pointing it out. --Edelseider (talk) 08:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

Thanks!

I had in fact looked for a Strasbourg disambiguation and there is none. Now I am surprised to see that the Strasburg disambiguation page does in fact include Strasbourg (plus a number of other places spelled differently from Strasburg).

Does the English Wikipedia commonly use disambiguation pages for misspellings? Or is there any language in which the name of the town is actually spelled "Strasburg"? --87.150.1.57 (talk) 12:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

P.S. Yeah, must have been vandalism, btw. Look at this. Why someone would get an account only to make two such nonsensical edits is beyond me. :-) --87.150.1.57 (talk) 12:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)

the fourth-largest river port in France after Nantes, Rouen and Bordeaux.

As far as I know, Strasbourg is the second river port in France. Nantes, Rouen and Bordeaux are in Esturies, with sea ships.

According to French wiki, Paris is the first river harbour ( Il est le deuxième port fluvial de France après le Port autonome de Paris et le deuxième port rhénan après Duisbourg .)

2A01:CB10:5AF:8C00:88FF:8A9E:5628:752D (talk) 08:54, 23 October 2019 (UTC) Jerome

Absolutely. The person who edited that (now reverted, with new added sources) confused "ports" with "river ports". --Edelseider (talk) 10:14, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Native name etc

The German name should be given more prominence. It should appear in the native name section of the infobox, and also be put directly after the French name. I'm well aware that Alsace has its own vernacular(s), but Hochdeutsch has been used there intermittently in an official capacity and it is widely taught in schools.-86.180.91.149 (talk) 14:31, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

• Council of Europe Palais de l'Europe aerial view.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:38, 9 January 2022 (UTC)