Talk:Speak Now (Taylor's Version)/GA1

GA Review

Passed. dxneo (talk) 13:47, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Ippantekina (talk · contribs) 05:52, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Dxneo (talk · contribs) 00:31, 25 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I will be reviewing this article in the next few days. Honestly, I've never seen laser-focused participants like the WP:SWIFT participants. You guys are really amazing, at this point I am convinced I have to join the project.

Is it well written?

A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout and words to watch:

Is it verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check?

A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

I like how every source's website/publisher is linked. I also noticed that this source requires subscription and the editor(s) indicated it.

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

Violation unlikely as Earwig finds no obvious problems. Earwig found 28% of copyright vio on a People source which is mostly the article's title and reception quotes.

Is it broad in its coverage?

A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

I noticed that you might have missed to add the release date information (in terms of prose) listed here. Two versions of the album were released in Japan on August 16.

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

Is it neutral?

It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

Is it stable?

It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

Overall:

Pass or Fail: Waiting on the nominator to address the release information

dxneo (talk) 17:25, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Dxneo for the review. I've added the Japanese release to prose :) Ippantekina (talk) 13:21, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great, I will pass this now. dxneo (talk) 13:45, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.