Talk:Sauron/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 19:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
· · · |
Fictional history
[edit]- wikilink "Vala", "Quenya"
- Done.
- "breaking the cosmic Music with discord" - could do with a bit of explanation.
- Glossed.
- "which Sauron followed" - followed chronologically, or in the sense of "acted according to"?
- "continued".
- "Downfall" isn't a word used in the previous section consider renaming that section "Downfall of Númenor" or decapitalising it in the text.
- Fixed.
- "Gollum's friend.." should this be "Sméagol's friend.."? I don't think he was called Gollum at that time. If this is changed, then there should be a mention that he was later known as Gollum, as that name occurs a few times in the article.
- Quite right. Done.
Appearance
[edit]- Suggest adding a word or to to introduce Gorlim.
- Glossed.
- "who has daunting eyes" - I think should be "who had daunting eyes"
- Done.
- "This raises the question of whether an "Eye" was Sauron's actual manifestation," - is that within "The Black Gate is Closed"?
- No it's Christopher Tolkien. Repeated ref for clarity.
Concept and creation
[edit]- "probably of the Eldar elves" is missing a citation. (Unless already supported by the Auden source.)
- Removed.
- "Other critics came closer to the mark;" - only one is mentioned, either reword or mention another. (Unless already supported by the Auden source.)
- Reworded.
- "1967" - publication was June 1968, but the conjecture may well be from 1967. Just noting this in case there is a typo in a year.
- Fixed.
Interpretations
[edit]- Looks fine.
- Noted.
Adaptations
[edit]- "portrayed as a humanoid creature ... in Ralph Bakshi's 1978 animated version" needs a source.
- Fixed.
- I had my doubts about cedmagic as a source but after looking at the author page, I think it's acceptable.
- Noted.
- The Telegraph source doesn't support all the titles listed for video games.
- Added ref.
In culture
[edit]- Looks fine.
- Noted.
Infobox and Lead
[edit]- Both look fine.
- Noted.
Images
[edit]- No issues.
- Noted.
Copyvio and plagiarism check
[edit]- Checked all matches above 4% on Earwig's Copyvio Detector. No concerns.
- Noted.
Happy to discuss, or be challenged on, any of my review comments. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 19:53, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for all your work on the article Chiswick Chap. I find the article to be comprehensive, balanced, well-structured and well-written. I've listed some points for consideration above. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:20, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
- Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your responses, Chiswick Chap. I'm happy to pass the article for GA. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 20:51, 3 July 2020 (UTC)
- Many thanks! Chiswick Chap (talk) 07:57, 3 July 2020 (UTC)