Talk:San Jose Diridon station

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the San Jose Diridon station article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1: 3 months

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

California: San Francisco Bay Area Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	San Francisco Bay Area portal This article is supported by San Francisco Bay Area task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit / Streetcars Low‑importance

	Trains Portal
DYK	June 21, 2015

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Streetcars.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:San Jose Diridon station.

Interior Photo of San Jose Diridon

I uploaded the image above to the Wikimedia Commons, and I'm wondering whether it would be worth including it in the Diridon Station article, and how best to do so. // Internet Esquire (talk) 17:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment

I have just assessed this article as Start Class. I think that it wouldn't take a great deal of work for this article to become C Class though. The boss 1998 (talk) 16:39, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Google

It's odd that there's no mention of the Diridon-related plans of Google described here in WP. Would the "Future" section of this article be a place to at least mention the planning? Dicklyon (talk) 06:03, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pi.3... removed my aerial as a "vanity image". I think it's useful for showing some context for the station. Maybe more so in relation to future plans than to what's in the article about the station itself, I agree. Dicklyon (talk) 06:25, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a great photo, and it very well may be useful if there was room for it in the article and if it was used to supplement prose. Currently, placing it in the very short Future section of the article (which is already mostly parallel to the track layout) causes it to protrude into the References section, which reduces the number of columns and adds significant whitespace. There is no logical connection between the current prose and this image; if you add a sentence or three about the Google development and caption the image appropriately, then the image would be more valuable to readers. And "vanity image" may have been overstating it a bit; however, I find it very frustrating when users repeatedly insert their own photos without due consideration for how they fit into the article. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:39, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to add content about Google due to my COI from working for them; but someone else can. As for fit and whitespace, that seems like an odd consideration to put a lot of weight on, when everyone's setup formats differently. In particular, extending into the refs section, causing fewer columns and white space, is a complete non-problem. Dicklyon (talk) 16:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you wish to suggest prose and references here, I'll be more than happy to check and add it per the usual COI process. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:40, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to suggest prose, but here's a recent local news story: [1]; and an older one: [2]. Dicklyon (talk) 00:10, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox photo

@Cristiano Tomás: I don't think that File:Southern Pacific Depot, 65 Cahill St., San Jose, CA 9-30-2012 1-21-02 PM.JPG is a good choice for the infobox image. It is awkwardly cropped - the crown and canopy are cut off at right, the wing at left, and the lamp post at top - and there's a bit of foliage at top. Additionally, the entire right wing is not visible. The existing photo, File:San Jose Diridon station, November 2019.JPG, is unobstructed, shows the complete station, and reflects its symmetry. If there is some need for a sunlit photo - which I don't think is essential - then File:USA-San Jose-Diridon Station-5.jpg would be a far better alternative to the image you have been adding. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:35, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. The old photo was better. Also agree that a sunlit picture isn't essential. RickyCourtney (talk) 20:52, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bike facilities

Caltrain upgraded the facilities to include elockers. Recommend an addition to that section.

https://www.caltrain.com/rider-information/bicycles/bike-parking-options-station Nawledge (talk) 21:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]