Talk:SDHB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

moved out of unassessed on the genetics project

1/19/17 DennisPietras (talk) 19:10, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Is paranglionic a typo?

I see many occurrences of the word paraganglioma and a handful of paraganglionic in this article but only one 'paranglionic' in the section on Impaired developmental apoptosis [second para, third sentence.]

I am not an expert, but this appears to be a typo. The 6-char sequence paraga seems to have been shortened to 'para'. Google finds only 141 occurrences of 'paranglionic' (versus 63,300 for paraganglionic), which mostly seem to derive from the English abstract of a 1995 Portuguese article by FR Silva.

There is a similar issue with 'paranglioma' instead of paraganglioma in the Wikipedia article on SDHD. Google finds more references in this case, but, for example, the Amazon.com category for 'paranglioma' refers to a book with paraganglia in the title.

- amoluf

Is SDHA a tumor suppressor gene or not?

This article says "Note the SDHA gene is not a tumor suppressor gene." without specifying any source, while the article about SDHA says the contrary "SDHA is a tumour suppressor gene" and provides a source reference [10]. Which statement is correct? 130.60.6.54 (talk) 23:01, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]