Talk:Redfall
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Redfall article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Redfall" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
"The game was review bombed by Steam users around the time of the game's launch..."
[edit]Is it really review bombing when the game does perform poorly both critically and functionally? Would it not be fair to say that a game that is hyped and released at a AAA level that disappoints both critics and fans is justified in receiving negative reviews? I don't think it's fair to say "review bombed" when the game does not perform well. 2403:4800:2437:E810:F9F3:D300:D98:1978 (talk) 00:17, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- The source claims it’s review bombing though. 2603:6010:11F0:3C0:2C20:E299:353F:4BC5 (talk) 13:35, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Just because a source claims it is, doesn't mean it's accurate. The game has been panned. There's literally no proof of review bombing and just because a source claims it doesn't mean it's scripture. The game has a shit ton of actual sources also that are slamming this game.
- 2607:FA49:763E:1F00:5A00:255C:511E:4402 (talk) 07:45, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- This is no longer an issue since the proper sourcing has been acquired. When editing Wikipedia, the text must coincide with the source. Originally there was only one source which claimed it was review bombing, hence the text should match that. If you want to change something in the future, give the proper sources to support your claim instead of raging on the talk page. 2603:6010:11F0:3C0:CE2:D591:3DD1:164B (talk) 03:48, 31 May 2023 (UTC)