Talk:RAF Fylingdales
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not appearing on any map
[edit]"Even though it still does not appear on any map". Wrong. It's on the CAA's aviation map, surrounded by a big HIRTA (High-Intensity Radio Transmissions Area). It's impossible to miss!BaseTurnComplete 20:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)
- The statement would have been true back in the 1980s as Mrs Thatcher had all MoD sites, such as RAF airfields, AWRE Aldermaston, etc., taken off of Ordnance Survey maps, as she thought they might be used for targeting the installations. This was more to do with an attempt to hinder political demonstrators from staging sit-ins at these sorts of places, than with making things difficult for the Soviets, who, presumably, just looked at their older maps of Britain when deciding where to aim any ICBMS.
- At the time, the protest by women at Greenham Common was making the news, much to Mr's Thatcher's and her government's embarrassment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.4.57.101 (talk) 09:43, 18 October 2011 (UTC)
Vigilamus
[edit]I do not know Latin, but I believe Vigilamus more accurately translates to "We stand guard". This would be consistent with the Canadian land forces motto, Vigilamus Pro Te meaning "We Stand on Guard for Thee". Is there anyone that knows Latin that would care to comment? 82.2.32.67 (talk) 18:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- It's translated as "We are watching" in RAF Fylingdales' visitor information booklet.Harumphy (talk) 10:13, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Assessment comment
[edit]The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:RAF Fylingdales/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
.
|
Last edited at 21:59, 30 May 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 03:44, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on RAF Fylingdales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081211153943/http://cndyorks.gn.apc.org/fdales/ to http://cndyorks.gn.apc.org/fdales
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:04, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Old references to ICNIRP/NRPB field strength limits
[edit]The section mentioning UK and EU limits on radiation field strength appears to be based on Yorkshire CND website which in turn goes back to 2008 statements about the difference between ICNIRP and NRPB limits. There appears to be no independent citations which mention whether current UK legal requirements are relying on NRPB alone, nor whether these old and non-independent sources remain valid citations. 194.53.185.222 (talk) 17:13, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
- Agree the whole controversy section appears to be outdated, it should be mentioned that CND are not happy but slimmed down a bit with regard to due weight and the lack of recent activity. MilborneOne (talk) 17:39, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 05:11, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
- C-Class military history articles
- C-Class military aviation articles
- Military aviation task force articles
- C-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- C-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- C-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- C-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- C-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- C-Class Cold War articles
- Cold War task force articles
- C-Class Yorkshire articles
- Mid-importance Yorkshire articles
- WikiProject Yorkshire articles