Jump to content

Talk:Puppy Love (Paul Anka song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

An infobox was requested for the 1960 Paul Anka recording of "Image:S125366.jpg' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:32, 1 October 2007 (UTC) why we have t[reply]

Original Research Reference Issues

[edit]

The listing of "Other Songs Called "Puppy Love" is valid in that all songs listed are referenced from the record information provided within the article itself. I see no need to add another listing outside the article confinements. Each listing provides the actual resource where the information was gotten: the record label and catalog number. The only original research was in organizing the listing to make it readable in a chronological fashion. Even the artist and composer information was retrieved from the actual record sources. There is nothing wihin the article that is not based upon these already published sources.

Consider that it could generally be deemed as "original research" when applying already published sources to an article.

FredClem (talk) 23:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]