Talk:Poulton-le-Fylde

Poulton-le-Fylde has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
November 3, 2010	Peer review	Reviewed
December 14, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
December 14, 2011	Peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Good article

Lancashire and Cumbria High‑importance

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Education in England#Specialist qualifications|academic qualifications]] The anchor (#Specialist qualifications) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Coaches of Warton

I've reverted this edit because as far as I can tell from their website, Coaches of Warton is a private coach company that hires out coaches, rather than public transport (which the article deals with). I'm sure there are more coach companies that can be used in the area. If this is not the case, a reliable source will be needed to add back the information.--Beloved Freak 12:19, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Poulton-le-Fylde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20121022025156/http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/oxfind/name?search=poulton-le-fylde&type=4096&submit=Search to http://www.ofsted.gov.uk/oxfind/name?search=poulton-le-fylde&type=4096&submit=Search

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:38, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 15 external links on Poulton-le-Fylde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:53, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Poulton-le-Fylde. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:08, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mains electricity

The article says "Mains electricity was brought to Poulton-le-Fylde around 1928.^[1]" How can a source dated 1926 support a claim about something that happened in 1928? I have twice tried to add a tag to query this claim. The edsum for the first revert said simply "not improved" and the edsum for the second revert said "If you aren't going to read the source, stop editing the page." The snippets in the GoogleBooks view, provided by that online source, don't really explain anything. What does page 6303 actually say? Could someone explain? Thank you.

References

^ Britain, Great (1926). The London Gazette. Tho. Newcomb over against Baynards Castle in Thames-street. p. 6303.

86.170.226.86 (talk) 21:14, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The mandate was to introduce electricity “within two years”. Book was published in 1926, so to say electricity was added in 1926 would be incorrect. I hope this helps. Seasider53 (talk) 21:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining. I'm not sure that's an ideal source, as there is no certainly that anything at all happened by 1928? The only claim that can be made is that "in 1926 mains electricity was planned to be installed within the next two years". But I can't even see the whole of page 6303, so I can't confirm that it supports even such a claim as that. 86.170.226.86 (talk) 21:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lead section

The lead section currently has 10 paragraphs, 8 of which are single sentences. I think these sentences should be joined into larger paragraphs. I'm not sure, however, that the content in the lead section is a summary of the entire article. Any suggestions? 86.170.226.86 (talk) 08:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to make an improvement to the lead section, but I was reverted here with the edit summary "not improved". I am genuinely surprised to see a lead section like this in what is meant to be a Good Article. Although that status was last reviewed over 12 years ago. So maybe a GA Review is now in order? 86.170.226.86 (talk) 09:00, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] Britain, Great (1926). The London Gazette. Tho. Newcomb over against Baynards Castle in Thames-street. p. 6303.

[1]