Jump to content

Talk:Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Redirect doesn't make sense

[edit]

I was researching all sorts of oil and gas issues, and then was deep into joint operational issues. practically every oil and gas well out there has a JOA (Joint Operating Agreement)... all of the sudden I was at some Newspaper Preservation Page... WTH? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.201.146.131 (talk) 21:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merger too narrow

[edit]

Joint Operating Agreements are adopted by may industries such as oil and gas. As such it should not link to a statute on newspapers. Instead the general definition and principles should be examined. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinosaur3232 (talkcontribs) 19:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Talk

[edit]

I strongly support the proposed merger. Any reason it hasn't happened yet? (Ardievu 09:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Laziness :) I performed the merger. Feel free to be bold in cases like this where it seems obvious. -- phoebe (brassratgirl) /(talk) 06:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First off, obviously Joint operating agreement is the larger article, so it'd make sense to merge Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970 to Joint operating agreement. But I'd disagree. I think joint operating agreements, the information about them and the list of them are a subtopic to NPA.

Anyway, nonetheless, they should be merged. Jesuschex 00:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]