Talk:Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Redirect doesn't make sense
[edit]I was researching all sorts of oil and gas issues, and then was deep into joint operational issues. practically every oil and gas well out there has a JOA (Joint Operating Agreement)... all of the sudden I was at some Newspaper Preservation Page... WTH? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.201.146.131 (talk) 21:12, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Merger too narrow
[edit]Joint Operating Agreements are adopted by may industries such as oil and gas. As such it should not link to a statute on newspapers. Instead the general definition and principles should be examined. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dinosaur3232 (talk • contribs) 19:50, 1 March 2012 (UTC)
Merger Talk
[edit]I strongly support the proposed merger. Any reason it hasn't happened yet? (Ardievu 09:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC))
- Laziness :) I performed the merger. Feel free to be bold in cases like this where it seems obvious. -- phoebe (brassratgirl) /(talk) 06:02, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
Merge from Joint operating agreement
[edit]First off, obviously Joint operating agreement is the larger article, so it'd make sense to merge Newspaper Preservation Act of 1970 to Joint operating agreement. But I'd disagree. I think joint operating agreements, the information about them and the list of them are a subtopic to NPA.
Anyway, nonetheless, they should be merged. Jesuschex 00:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Start-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Newspapers articles
- Low-importance Newspapers articles