Talk:M.C. Kids

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Train simulator (disambiguation) (3 participants)
Preston Arsement (2 participants)
Jackpot World (1 participant)
Bejeweled Stars (5 participants)
Melee (game terminology) (5 participants)
Godzilla: Monster of Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Godzilla 2: War of the Monsters (5 participants; relisted)
Crazy Bus (14 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Non-NES Versions

I'm wondering what source was used to say that M.C. Kids was also released on "Game Boy (though only in Europe), Commodore 64, Amiga, and for PCs running MS-DOS". From [1] and [2] it seems that it was only ever made for NES. zzymyn 13:01, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed this sentence, if someone finds a source, add it back. zzymyn 00:15, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just look at the screen shots of this game at MobyGames Calvero2 18:58, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, the info has been re-added. zzymyn 00:04, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Absolute minimum of promotion

Does "absolute minimum of promotion" usually include television ads? Because there were definitely television ads in France.Medinoc (talk) 14:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Reception

Hi guys. I removed[3] claims that are of the nature of a "reception" section. One is about the criticism of the game being an advergame; the statement is part false and part contradictory, contradicted throughout the rest of the article. It's an aimless claim. If these things are true, they can be reinstated with a citation in the Reception section. That's really what should happen, along with reviews of the game that are contemporary to its release. I couldn't find any online just now, and I imagine that they are trapped in dead trees. Maybe we can get a screenshot of a TV advertisement. Thanks! — Smuckola (Email) (Talk) 18:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]