Talk:Lyon & Lyon

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled

Does anyone know how the firm went into bankruptcy if it was one of the premier patent law firms during its heyday?

I was a patent drafter with the company just months before it went under. I wasn't there at the end, but my coworkers basically said, "too many partners". There were around 92 partners at the time, and I suppose it was difficult to make decisions. Pretty sad for a century-old company.--Metron4 (talk) 00:09, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was an attorney there and left shortly before the bankruptcy. There was a dispute between the old guard in the LA office (main office) and some of the newer, younger partners (particularly in the San Diego office) over how the profits should be split and the general direction of the firm. Almost the entire San Diego office left en masse for another firm as a result. Things quickly unraveled after that as more groups left for other firms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.248.226.76 (talk) 02:26, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]