Talk:Luke Ford (blogger)

This article was nominated for deletion on 22 May 2017. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Luke Ford (blogger) is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography High‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

spelling of name?

Mark Wallice or Marc Wallice?

Picture use

Just a short note that Luke has generously consented to allow the photos from lukeisback.com to be posted to Wikipedia under a Creative Commons 2.5 license. See here for more details.

Libellous statements

We have been contacted about libellous statements about Ford being prone to sweeping generalisations. Please do not restore the statement without verifiable sources. Capitalistroadster 03:47, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of link to LukeFord.net

I had the following exchange with AnonEMouse:

Any particular reason you removed the links to his sites from his article? Since they're how he makes a living, and most of the reason for his fame, they're fairly important, in my humble opinion. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 14:47, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I removed lukeford.net because of it's gross accusations of innocent people and does not deserve the credibility of Wikipedia. He recently removed some of his libelous content that is already there as a "settlement out of court" before his court case was closed. Many, many such libelous statement remain. I apologize for removing lukeford.com; that was my mistake.

--ShalomAlYisrael 14:12, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Here is what the Wikipedia:External_links style guide has to say:

What should be linked to. 2.: "Articles about any organization, person, web site, or other entity should link to the official site if there is one."
Links normally to be avoided: "...for example, if the subject of an article has an official website, then it should be linked to even if it contains factually inaccurate material."

That something we link to may be libelous is not considered a sufficient reason to remove the link. We link to the official site of The National Enquirer, Star Magazine, and similar Supermarket tabloids, which get sued for libel more in a year than Luke Ford in a lifetime. What we should do is note that Ford has been accused of inaccuracy and libel, and I think the article does that: "Prominent porn stars ... criticised the errors and inaccuracy" , "He was sued for defamation multiple times". All that has been cited with links to verifiable, reputable, reliable sources - see Wikipedia: Verifiability. If you have additional published information about that, please write about it, and give a citation - or, if you prefer, just give me the citation link, and I'll add it to the article. But we link to many worse things here from Wikipedia than merely LukeFord.net: American Nazi Party, Hezbollah ...AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 14:48, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Orthodox conversion is unverified, only a claim"

This is about my reversion of this edit. For someone who feels strongly about their religion, saying that they only claim to have genuinely converted to it, is often considered insulting. According to most sources, Ford feels rather strongly about his religious identity as an Orthodox Jew: it plays a major part in his biography, he wrote at least one book, "Rebel Without A Shul", about it, and started several blogs mostly about Judaism in general, and his Judaism in particular. Therefore, according to the Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy unless we find reasonably respected published sources that actively question his claim to have converted, we need to take his word for it, and not cast doubt on it without such sources.

If we do find verifiable sources questioning the conversion, and can cite their objections, then I will supporting restoring the "claims" language. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 16:28, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Continued writing

I have removed the following sentence from the article: "He later retracted this statement and continues to write for lukeisback.com." Luke has advised me otherwise in an email:

The final sentence in my wikipedia profile is false on both counts: "He later retracted this statement and continues to write for lukeisback.com."

I haven't written a word for the site since Oct. 22 when I announced it had been sold. The new owner (wishes to be anonymous to avoid the aggravation of writing a gossip site) has imitated my style at times but it is plainly different... He has also cut and pasted some lukeford.net entries...

Article changed to reflect this information. Tabercil (talk) 22:31, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Luke Ford

Cyberbot II has detected links on Luke Ford which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://lukeisback.com/?p=1639
Triggered by \blukeisback\.com\b on the local blacklist
http://lukeisback.com/?p=1794
Triggered by \blukeisback\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:09, 11 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on Luke Ford

Cyberbot II has detected links on Luke Ford which have been added to the blacklist, either globally or locally. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed or are highly inappropriate for Wikipedia. The addition will be logged at one of these locations: local or global If you believe the specific link should be exempt from the blacklist, you may request that it is white-listed. Alternatively, you may request that the link is removed from or altered on the blacklist locally or globally. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. Please do not remove the tag until the issue is resolved. You may set the invisible parameter to "true" whilst requests to white-list are being processed. Should you require any help with this process, please ask at the help desk.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://lukeisback.com/?p=1639
Triggered by \blukeisback\.com\b on the local blacklist
http://lukeisback.com/?p=1794
Triggered by \blukeisback\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:22, 14 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Luke Ford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.lukeford.com/photos/content_1-26-96.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:59, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Porndemic

Ford is featured in the 2018 documentary film Porndemic. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 07:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]