Talk:Legal defense fund
 | This page was proposed for deletion by Neuropol (talk · contribs) on 17 May 2024 with the comment: Sources do not go in-depth to subject; "legal defense fund" seems to be a name for many organizations, but no available sources actually provide a coherent definition and mostly link to organizations that use the term "legal defense fund" in their name, as opposed to providing anything of value to the term "legal defense fund." It was contested by voorts (talk · contribs) on 2024-05-18 with the comment: This is a notable concept, there's coverage of it (see, e.g., [1]), and this article can be a WP:BCA. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Move. Jafeluv (talk) 23:30, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Legal Defense Fund → Legal defense fund –
It was generically downcased in the article text, anyway. Per WP:CAPS ("Wikipedia avoids unnecessary capitalization") and WP:TITLE, this is a generic, common term, not a propriety or commercial term, so the article title should be downcased. Lowercase will match the formatting of related article titles. Tony (talk) 08:56, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Dohn joe (talk) 19:00, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moving page?
[edit]Is this page being moved? Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JJGators (talk • contribs) 23:53, 6 February 2012 (UTC)