Talk:Leece

	North West England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lancashire and Cumbria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Lancashire and Cumbria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Lancashire and CumbriaWikipedia:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaTemplate:WikiProject Lancashire and CumbriaLancashire and Cumbria articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

CCHT external link

This link was added to the article after discussion on the WP Reliable Sources Noticeboard. See: WP:RSN exercise. No information from the CCHT link has been put into the body of the article in the form of citations because it has not yet been verified for 100% accuracy by the Victoria County History project for Cumbria. (This will take some years to do). Laplacemat (talk) 11:05, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Village/Hamlet

In an attempt to find sources for the village/hamlet dispute, I found only references to Leece being a village, and so that is what we will have to stick with until sources saying otherwise can be found. J Milburn 20:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Josh the lack of a religious building due to the organized desicration of the chapel makes leece a hamlet as a resident i presume i am in the know

I am guessing this is Dave? Please read WP:V and WP:OR. I have three sources for this place being a village, you have your own knowledge for this place being a hamlet, which is not allowed. J Milburn 18:00, 19 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Josh you are correct unless it is published im trying to find the citation

Expansion?

I have left this tagged as a Stub, but I cannot think of anything else in the village worth mentioning. It could be bulked out with pictures or an infobox, but does anyone know of anything else worth writing about, that sources exist for? J Milburn 20:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Leece. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050428112620/http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=110122005 to http://thescotsman.scotsman.com/index.cfm?id=110122005

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:36, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]