Jump to content

Talk:La Salle Green Hills

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeLa Salle Green Hills was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 14, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
August 7, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
July 10, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee
If you are attending or had attended La Salle Green Hills, you can add this userbox on your userpage: {{User LSGH}}, to display this on your userpage:
LSGHAnimo La Salle! This user is proud to be from LSGH.

Short name

[edit]

What's the shortname for La Salle Green Hills? La Salle? LSGH? La Salle GH? What? --Howard the Duck 10:11, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LSGH. --Mithril Cloud 14:22, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK. Thanks. --Howard the Duck 14:51, 28 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LSGH...

Failed "good article" nomination

[edit]

This article failed good article nomination. This is how the article, as of July 14, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: No, it contains too many lists. In fact, the article looks like one long list. There are a lot of one sentcence subsections. As a result its table of contents is too overwhelming. So the layout should be changed to comply with WP:LAYOUT and in particular with Wikipedia:Embedded_list. For instance, many lists can moved into separate articles. The leading section is too short. It should be 3-4 paragraphes long (see WP:LEAD).
2. Factually accurate?: Difficult to access since the article has only five references in the list; two of the them (1 and 5) link to the school's web site. Refs 2-4 are strange because they don't provided names of publishers, dates of publications, ISDNs and other information. Are they books, journal articles or something different? Where can they be found? The inline citations are almost absent. I noticed them only in two paragraphs.
3. Broad in coverage?: May be. I'm not sure because the references are sparse.
4. Neutral point of view?: The same as previous.
5. Article stability? Yes
6. Images?: OK

When these issues are addressed, the article can be resubmitted for consideration. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you for your work so far. — Ruslik 12:52, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review comments

[edit]
  • The tone of the article needs to be cleaned up quite a lot.
    • In particular, the Kundirana and the Drama club are written in an encyclopedic tone.
  • Many sections do not appear to have a source and might be based on the author's personal expereince
  • Lack of 3rd party refs. Most are from the school itself or the Church organisation which runs it. If there are no 3rd party refs then the info needs to be culled or the content cannot be regarded for GA. This has caused a large neutrality problem.
  • What is the source for the alumni?
  • What are the academic results of this school? how does it rank? what policy changes have happened in 50 years? Hardly any history is there at all.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 09:19, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. I`ll try to fix these problems. Thanks. - Gebherbosa

GA Nomination

[edit]

Okay, it says that this article tried out 2 times for GA. I fixed the article up and let's see if it'll pass, hope it will.

- Skrulls (talk) 14:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]

GA Fail. Review can be found here: Talk:La Salle Green Hills/GA1

[edit]

The image File:DLSGreenArchers.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --20:36, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Adult Night High School

[edit]

Do you think we should create a seperate article for ANHS?

It technically does not fall under the LSGH system (completely different faculty, admin) and deserves to be looked at differently. It isn't just vocationals (that's the non-formal education of NFE program). It's a working and separate High School that teaches the same High School units. It's also separately evaluated and an autonomous member of the PAASCU. [list

[school page and level accred]

(my comment :))

File:LSGHmap.png Nominated for speedy Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:LSGHmap.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:LSGHmap.png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 09:36, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://wiki.alumni.net/wiki/Asia/Philippines/Metro_Manila/Mandaluyong_City/La_Salle_Green_Hills/
    Triggered by \balumni.net\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 17:29, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:36, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on La Salle Green Hills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 06:10, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 18 external links on La Salle Green Hills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 21:17, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 7 external links on La Salle Green Hills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 09:59, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on La Salle Green Hills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:58, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on La Salle Green Hills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:00, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on La Salle Green Hills. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:19, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:La_Salle_Green_Hills&oldid=1257825555"